Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Yesterday

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Purge server cache

Shortcut
Purge page cache if page isn't updating.
More information < March 16, March 18 > ...
< March 16 March 18 >
Close

Mainframe audit


Mainframe audit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is written as advice and instructions to a learner, and does not seem WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC. It may be of interest to those who contribute to mainframe computer. BlockArranger (talk) 23:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Comment Do you feel that the content is a valid topic and while the references arent cited in line might be correct? If its just written poorly, thats not necessarily a reason to delete. Unfortunately, a lot of these sources dont look readily accesible. ← Metallurgist (talk) 02:57, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Shoshana Strook


Shoshana Strook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has multiple issues:

  • low-quality sources (e.g. TRT, infopal, vicenews.it).
  • unsourced statements.
  • misrepresentation of sources (e.g. cited source does not say: "While initial reports from some sources suggested suicide, the Israeli police opened a formal investigation into the circumstances of her death due to the ongoing high-profile criminal allegations she had leveled against her family")
  • pulls in material from sources that don't mention the subject (e.g. Haaretz article about conviction of subject's brother).

This is the coverage I have found, but I do not believe it is sufficient to meet GNG , especially because of WP:CRIME considerations. I think this topic should be a paragraph on the page of the subject's mother, Orit Strook, unless/until better sourcing is found. Rainsage (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Israel. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Several of the issues raised have been addressed in a recent edit. The low-quality sources (voxnews.it, infopal, the original broken TRT World URL) have been replaced with citations from The Jerusalem Post and International Business Times UK. The Haaretz citation for Zviki Strook's conviction has been replaced with a direct Ynet News source that explicitly covers the subject's brother. The misrepresentation in the Death section has been reworded to reflect only what the Jerusalem Post source actually states. Unsourced statements in the Legal action subsection remain and are a work in progress — sourcing for the Italy complaint is being sought.
    On the substantive GNG question: the subject is not notable merely as a family member of Orit Strock but in her own right as the originator of a sustained public whistleblowing campaign that generated a national debate in Israel around judicial gag orders, the handling of abuse allegations against political figures, and the role of Lahav 433. This coverage is independent of her mother. The WP:CRIME consideration raised by the nominator applies more naturally to perpetrators than to victims and activists. A paragraph on Orit Strock's page would not adequately cover the independent public debate this subject generated. Venusasaguy (talk) 02:01, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    I removed your reference to International Business Times per WP:IBTIMES. Lafi90 (talk) 02:19, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    It may be true that there is a national debate in Israel about these things, but I have not seen it widely covered in reliable sources. We would need much better sourcing to warrant an entire article about this. Actually, WP:CRIME specifically warns against making articles about people who are notable primarily for being victims of a crime (in this case the crimes are currently unproven allegations). Rainsage (talk) 15:38, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete - WP:A7 Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:30, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    Keep - This isn't an A7 candidate. There has been sustained, non-routine coverage in sources like The Times of Israel and TRT World dating back to April 2025. You can't claim a7 for someone who has been the subject of multiple independent investigative reports and a Lahav 433 case. Grethko (talk) 17:12, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • This should not be deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-17090-08 (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Lisa Marcaurelle


Lisa Marcaurelle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Highly resume-like and appears to fail WP:NBIO. Amigao (talk) 22:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Guitar Dominance!


Guitar Dominance! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing is notable about this entry. Artist is not notable. Album is not notable. Fails all music notability guidelines. Cannot find any RS. Maineartists (talk) 21:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete - Didn't find anything else anything besides the AllMusic review. The artist actually might be notable (many borderline notable solo albums) and normally non-notable albums should be redirected to artist article but in this case it should be deleted unless someone is willing to create the article. --Mika1h (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not much of anything out there, and [this] doesn't cut it. Also no good redirect target, as artist not notable. WidgetKid Converse 04:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

November 2025 United States military video controversy


November 2025 United States military video controversy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is WP:NOTNEWS, fine to include on the articles of those members of Congress and probably Hegseth too, but not notable for its own article. It's not a "controversy" to tell service members not to follow illegal orders. And Wikipedia:Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United States of America. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Military. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTNEWS. The content can be included in their biographies, there is no need for a separate page. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Comment Across all six biographies, pretty much the same sentences (and the exact same sources) are used, albeit with some perhaps-inevitable variations between them:
More information Article, Sentence 1 ...
Article Sentence 1[1][2] Sentence 2[1][3][4][5][6]
Elissa Slotkin In November, she was one of six Democratic lawmakers to be part of a video telling service members they can refuse illegal orders. Trump called those in the video, including Slotkin, traitors who should be charged with sedition punishable by death, and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Jason Crow In November 2025, Crow was one of six people, all Democratic lawmakers, to be part of a video telling servicemembers they can refuse illegal orders. In response later that month, President Trump posted on social media calling those in the video, including Crow, traitors who should be charged with sedition punishable by death, and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Chris Deluzio In November 2025, Deluzio was one of six people, all Democratic lawmakers, to be part of a video telling servicemembers they can refuse illegal orders. In response later that month, President Donald Trump posted on social media calling those in the video, including Deluzio, traitors who should be charged with sedition punishable by death, and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Chrissy Houlahan In November 2025, Houlahan was one of six Democratic lawmakers to be part of a video telling servicemembers they can refuse illegal orders. In response the following day, President Trump posted on social media calling those in the video, including Houlahan, traitors who should be charged with sedition punishable by death, and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Mark Kelly In November 2025, Kelly was one of six Democratic lawmakers to participate in a video reminding military service members that they may refuse "illegal orders". Later that month, President Trump called those in the video, including Kelly, traitors who should be charged with sedition and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Maggie Goodlander In November 2025, Goodlander was one of six people, all Democratic lawmakers, to be part of a video telling servicemembers they can refuse illegal orders. In response later that month, President Trump posted on social media calling those in the video, including Goodlander, traitors who should be charged with sedition punishable by death, and shared a social media post calling for them to be hanged.
Close
References
  1. [1]
    Samuels, Brett; Beitsch, Rebecca. "Trump deems Dems 'traitors' over calls for military to resist unlawful orders". The Hill. Retrieved 24 November 2025.
  2. [2]
    Fuller, Haley (November 21, 2025). "When Lawmakers Lecture the Military: Why the "Unlawful Orders" Video Invites Confusion". Military.com.
  3. [3]
    Hartmann, Margaret. "Trump Shares Call to 'Hang' Democratic Lawmakers". New York. Retrieved November 20, 2025.
  4. [4]
    Mayes-Osterman, Cybele. "Trump accuses six Democratic lawmakers of 'seditious behavior, punishable by death'". USA Today.
  5. [5]
    "Trump calls for Democratic lawmakers to face trial for 'seditious behavior'". Politico. November 20, 2025.
  6. [6]
    Staff, WSYX (November 20, 2025). "'HANG THEM': Trump reacts to Democratic lawmakers' video appeal to military". WSYX.
If keeping isn't favored, Rhetoric of Donald Trump § Second presidency may be a possible target to blank and redirect to. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 14:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep: This has been a controversy (the news decides that; not Wikipedia editors' opinions on the merits of the video). This multi-month saga has included multiple lawsuits and continued, sustained coverage in reliable sources. The event, on its own, is notable. Bravelake (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment @Bravelake: - Is there a coverage from this year? I do not see it cited, to support your claim of "sustained coverage". --Altenmann >talk 19:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
The article on Elissa Slotkin does cite one source from this year.[1]
– MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 00:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
The fallout of the video is ongoing
The BBC
The Hill
The Hill (Democrats ongoing demand for review of prosecutors who brought a suit against the “seditious six”)
Beyond the continued discussion and the evolution of facts, the saga was widely covered in reliable sources and represents a non-routine, non-gossip event in American governance. Bravelake (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep but def update, as real world efforts were undertaken and then kind of fell apart or were abandoned. Hyperbolick (talk) 03:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
  • Keep but only because the mainstream media has kept this non-controversy alive. Bearian (talk) 11:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Politicians made some claims, and media reported on them. But this is still ultimately primary coverage, which is not enough to pass NEVENT. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    But thats kindof conceding that this isnt notable and its just a passing media todo. ← Metallurgist (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
  • For a convenient overview, here's a source assessment table:


More information Source, Independent? ...
Source assessment table
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
Samuels, Brett; Beitsch, Rebecca (November 20, 2025). "Trump deems Dems 'traitors' over calls for military to resist unlawful orders". The Hill. Retrieved November 20, 2025.
 Yes Yes WP:THEHILL ? Unknown
Yes See this discussion ? Unknown
Hartmann, Margaret. "Trump Shares Call to 'Hang' Democratic Lawmakers". New York. Retrieved November 20, 2025.
 Yes Yes WP:INTELLIGENCER ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:USATODAY ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:POLITICO ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:RSP § ABC News (US) ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:RSP § ABC News (US) ? Unknown
Yes No WP:RSEDITORIAL ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:NYT Yes ✔ Yes
Yes Yes WP:CNN ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:CBS ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:THEHILL ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:NBC ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:THEHILL ? Unknown
Yes Yes WP:RSPBBC ? Unknown
Yes No WP:RSEDITORIAL ✘ No
Yes Yes WP:RSPBBC No Too little analysis to count as secondary ✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
Close
    – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
    The NYT source is fine, The Hill is not, as it consists mainly of quotes from various officials providing little secondary analysis. Kelob2678 (talk) 08:35, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Kelob2678: Are you commenting on one NYT article and one Hill article in particular (if so, please specify which articles you're talking about), or are you commenting on the general nature of all articles of each newspaper? – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    I somehow thought that there are two GNG-contributing articles in the table, now I see there are three. There is an op-ed that I missed, but it is not reliable per WP:RSEDITORIAL. Another NYT source is good and contributes to notability, and the Hill source contains too little analysis to count as a secondary source. Kelob2678 (talk) 15:28, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: It is a controversy but the article desparately needs an update or else it probably should be deleted. UnilandofmaTalk 19:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Please note that all NOTNEWS tells us is that not all verifiable events are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Whether this or any particular event is suitable or not depends on its impact, as reflected in secondary sources. "Per NOTNEWS" tells us very little on the notability of the subject.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× ☎ 21:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Keep or merge somewhere. Being in poor shape doesn't require deletion, too soon to tell if it will meet WP:NEVENT Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 21:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Kindof a piddling story. Im not even sure the bio mentions are justified, but Ill leave that to local editors. I cant see how this will be worth any thought in 10 years. ← Metallurgist (talk) 03:04, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: Stuff was said, Trump didn't like it and the world carried on. This hasn't led to anyone losing their job in the military or in the media. I don't see lasting notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Juan Du


    Juan Du (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    The subject of this article has requested its deletion and has expressed privacy concerns. Does not meet WP:PROF. Those editors with VRT access may reference ticket:2026030310014167. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Architecture, and Canada. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 21:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete One book is not enough for WP:NAUTHOR, and the citation count is too low for WP:NPROF#1. The position of the dean is not enough for WP:NPROF#6, Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean, department chair, etc.) are generally not sufficient to qualify under Criterion 6 alone. A redirect is not desirable since the subject requests deletion. Kelob2678 (talk) 00:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Dean of the school of architecture at one of the largest universities in Canada would be notable, and the architectural work has been reviewed in critical sources. She's currently on medical leave per the internet, I wonder if that has something to do with the request. Some critical review of her book here , ,, and a lengthy interview here (doesn't help notability but adds to the article) . More than enough coverage to pass AUTHOR. Oaktree b (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
      And more reviews , . The book certainly would be notable; if this person isn't could be a redirect to the book. Oaktree b (talk) 13:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete; I think there's a compelling case for notability, but if the subject has requested deletion, I'm inclined to say we should honour it here. Josh Milburn (talk) 15:43, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    David McKenna (actor)


    David McKenna (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    It seems way too soon to have an article on this actor, who only has one role so far, no awards won for it, and any media coverage is focused on the show he was in (Lord of the Flies) or his upcoming role in Narnia: The Magician's Nephew. While he will likely get more coverage and meet guidelines for WP:NACTOR once Narnia is released, it will not hurt to wait until that actually happens to restore/recreate the article. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 20:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    International Centre for Human Rights

    AfDs for this article:
    International Centre for Human Rights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Based on this talk page discussion it appears there is not a single, independent, reliable source that gives SIGCOV to ICHR. Instead, the sources merely cite ICHR's statements on news that relate to third parties, not ICHR itself. I realize there was an AfD on this just last month, but please see this discussion. VR (Please ping on reply) 20:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. VR (Please ping on reply) 20:42, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Speedy keep as this was only just recently discussed, as the nom knows and acknowledges. If anything, let I'd want to see more input on the talk page over some time before returning with a 3rd nomination soon thereafter when this is speedily kept. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 20:57, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      This user also !voted in the previous AfD and so I asked this very user 2 weeks ago to find sources on this topic and they have thus far not found any sources nor participated on the talk page.VR (Please ping on reply) 21:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Iran. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:03, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Keep Boud made a fairly robust support here. Despite that discussion later on, I dont see it as deletion worthy. ← Metallurgist (talk) 03:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    @Metallurgist are there any sources in that !vote that meet WP:GNG? I believe I looked at those sources and found that every single one failed GNG(table here). If I missed something, please let me know.VR (Please ping on reply) 17:49, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Manuela De Iuliis


    Manuela De Iuliis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Subject fails to meet the WP:GNG because of a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 20:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Cerge for Truth


    Cerge for Truth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG. Nothing to support notability found in a search DonaldD23 talk to me 20:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Burn (energy drink)


    Burn (energy drink) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    I PROD'd this a little while ago because it didn't have significant coverage. There doesn't seem to be anything about this, at least in English. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 20:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    I support merging as a first option, I listed this here for a quicker and larger consensus Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 22:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    BEI-Teesside


    BEI-Teesside (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    I really hesitate to nominate an article that has been with us for c.16 years, but...

    This power station never happened. The developers went bust. The people who took on the development after the developers went bust went bust. The designers have removed the project from their website.

    To make this more difficult, there is a different biomass power station on a different site nearby, which makes finding out exactly what happened to this one very difficult as the false positive hits overwhelm the results, assuming that any cancellation was ever officially announced and reported on. For instance, reference 4, supporting the phrase "Construction began in January 2016." appears to be referring to the other plant, not this one.

    In short, I think this was WP:CRYSTALBALL when it was written, which has had knock-on effects across a range of our policies and guidelines including WP:V. Note that the plant was considered notable enough for an article, but the owner-operator was not, which is odd in and of itself. • a frantic turtle 🐢 19:57, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Ali Shahid Mohamed


    Ali Shahid Mohamed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG. I've found little to no information about him besides him being the Surgeon General of the MNDF and that he is the current President of the Maldives Medical and Dental Council. The "Academic qualifications" section is sourced from his Linkedin which is WP:UGC. I see no reason to keep this article. UnilandofmaTalk 19:33, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom and also ref 2 not mentioning him PeriodicEditor (talk) 19:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Position held in the military could be notable, but we really only have a CV here. There are three hits in Gnews; this is typical , a name in a list or an article about other things. I don't see enough sourcing to keep the article. Oaktree b (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Moira Forbes


    Moira Forbes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NBIO. The sources are a mish-mash of WP:ABOUTSELF bios and self-congratulatory appointment press releases. There is not WP:SIGCOV about Forbes that is not connected to her family or that is independent that would establish notability. Longhornsg (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Delete. This article does not meet WP:GNG, in addition to the aforementioned WP:NBIO and WP:SIGCOV. This reads like someone was paid to write this article (though I am not necessarily saying anyone was). Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Forbes family (publishers), where the subject is mentioned; never thought I'd see the day where I'd have to cite WP:FORBES for an actual Forbes as to why GNG/N isn't met, but your family's magazine that you run is not a neutral source (used several times) in any sense here. Nathannah • 📮 20:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Fatemeh Pasandideh


    Fatemeh Pasandideh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    She lacks WP:SIGCOV and in-depth coverage, the present sources are just match reports and WP:ROUTINE. Svartner (talk) 06:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Iran. Svartner (talk) 06:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Since this week in the main news worldwide. See for instance here. Many people will start reading about her. The article has been expanded significantly since nomination. ~2026-15173-44 (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per recent events as ~2026-15173-44 pointed out. There are more Persian-language sources, too, e.g. فاطمه پسندیده، شماره ۱۰ تیم ملی زنان ایران، به استرالیا پناهنده شد [Fatemeh Pasandide, No. 10 of Iran's women's national team, defected to Australia]. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep - players in national teams and top clubs are inherently notable anyway, and for reasons stated above. More will be published, and public interest is high. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Defection of Iran women's national football team - as possible search term. Not enough coverage, and none of the arguments above are grounded in policy/reality. GiantSnowman 19:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep – She is just as notable as the other four women who defected. Assadzadeh (talk) 19:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      keep Gryllida 21:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep As outlined by other users above. I expect many sources that can be used in the future as her new life will undoubtedly be of interest to Australian media. Superegz (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep. International-level sportsperson. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:25, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per above and notability.--Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment Keeps are making depreciated arguments. NFOOTBALL was scrapped meaning footballers have to pass GNG regardless of what level they play at. Public interest is irrelevant. Assuming there will be further sources is crystal balling. Dougal18 (talk) 11:22, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
      "...Wikipedia editors have been very liberal in allowing for adequate time, particularly for cases where English-language sources are difficult to find." Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
      I would expect Australian media (in English) to have coverage about this person, if any. Oaktree b (talk) 20:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Can someone just close this process now and remove the article tag? Views have been 1-2,000, and there is an overwhelming vote to keep. I would also point out that editors will be able to add much more once we can access Iranian sources again. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

    The problem is that none of the votes provided any sources with WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 23:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    There are many sources relating to recent events, but Iranian sources are just not available at the moment. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Svartner, you're wrong; I did. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    The news you posted only mentions that she requested asylum in Australia, without any in-depth coverage. Svartner (talk) 09:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per basic notability - public interest and ongoing media coverage matter for GNG. Bearian (talk) 11:54, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Fails GNG. Dougal18 (talk) 11:27, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per Australian Media - public interest for GNG. Makejets (talk) 02:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Defection of Iran women's national football team, all coverage in the article is related to her defection, and we shouldn't have an article on people who are notable only for one event, unless coverage is really substantial (Gavrilo Princip being a canonical example), which is not the case here. Kelob2678 (talk) 08:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment She's just joined Brisbane Roar, and will no doubt continue to get coverage in Australian media. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Despite all the keep !votes, it still has a sourcing issue.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 18:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect. As a couple others have said, I think it would be the right move to redirect this to the Defection of Iran women's national football team page. If she receives notable invidual coverage in the future, then this page can be made again, but I have yet to see it. Redvelvetvanilaaaaaaaaa (talk) 19:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect as suggested seems fine. Not quite notable yet, if ever. TOOSOON to see what will happen. If coverage over the next few months or years happens, this can easily be expanded. Oaktree b (talk) 20:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      Who knows, in a perfect world, the situation in Iran improves to such a point that they return home to have a long career... Problem is, we just don't know at this point. They could get injured while playing and fade away in Australia. One is more notable then the other and we can't predict what will happen. Oaktree b (talk) 20:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per WP:GNGEaglesFan37 (talk) 04:05, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per WP:GNG, the subject represented a national team supports notability. Tatupiplu'talk 14:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    MEXC


    MEXC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NCORP. Reliable sources do not cover MEXC in depth. The one good reference (Reuters) lists it as an example of one of ten exchanges in an article primarily about a coin offering.

    Also uses clearly fictitious references. all do not resolve. ~ A412 talk! 17:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Ram Chandra (Babuji)


    Ram Chandra (Babuji) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: The nominator has been blocked as a sock.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kelob2678 (talk) 17:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Weak Keep - Ram Chandra is a central figure in Sahaj Marg and has written books related to Sahaj Marg meditations - searches shows some coverage, but maybe there are non-English sources with WP:SIGCOV? Asteramellus (talk) 01:56, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Gustavo Mariani


    Gustavo Mariani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Does not pass WP:NBIO and no indication of any notability. Sources all from company website, a listing on Reuters and a government document. Orange sticker (talk) 17:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Government College of Engineering, Erode


    Government College of Engineering, Erode (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Gavrilo Martsenkovich


    Gavrilo Martsenkovich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG; tagged for lack of SIGCOV since 2009. I can't access the links on Ukrainian Wikipedia, which is likewise a stub dump. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 16:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Southeastern Summer Theatre Institute


    Southeastern Summer Theatre Institute (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Unnotable club. Mentions are not significant and the page's citations do not add to notability. Possibly mergeable into Hilton Head High School's article, but they seem relatively separate from each other besides sharing a location. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete also the only references in the article are bare URLs, one of them goes to Google+ (which probably most people know that it was shutdown a while ago). Junk Junker (talk) 19:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Adhiyamaan College of Engineering


    Adhiyamaan College of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NSOURCE and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 14:27, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Blacks, Illinois


    Blacks, Illinois (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Moving on to Illinois, here we have a station stop on a rail line that died relatively early but which still shows as a faint trace on GMaps. Mr. Black [www.google.com/books/edition/Annual_Report_of_the_Illinois_Farmers_In/4MAwAQAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq="Blacks"+Illinois+adams+county&pg=PA448&printsec=frontcover died here], and there is/was a farm just down the road, But I don't see any evidence here on any map that there was anything beyond maybe a station and passing siding, and there's no sign of anything at all on aerials. So not a notable settlement, or even a settlement at all. Mangoe (talk) 14:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per failure of WP:NGEO. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete, never had a post office per Jim Forte Postal History. Newspapers.com is difficult to sort through due to "Blacks" appearing in other contexts, but given the WP:BEFORE done by the nominator, it doesn't seem like this one meets notability. Jordano53 19:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete In addition to there not being a community visible on Google Maps's imagery, the creator's userpage and the date of creation makes me think that this might be a symptom of WP:GNIS and WP:MASSCREATION. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 20:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Yes to the first, no to the second. At the time, I assumed that almost anything in GNIS was at some point a real place, and I started a lot of stubs based entirely on the GNIS. As we all know now, that was a very bad assumption. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete - agree with nom. Asteramellus (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete as the creator. Another one of those articles I created under the mistaken impression that GNIS was more reliable than it is. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Hayford Akrofi


    Hayford Akrofi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    This article should be deleted. The references are wholly unreliable and there are no more articles to be found. Very few of the statements in the original article are verifiable, e.g. there is no record that he was accepted by the Royal Institute of British Architects. There is no record of him building any buildings, either in the UK or Ghana--he renovated houses. Indeed, there is nothing to prove that he was an architect at all. As a "political activist", there is no record of accomplishments in his endeavours. This article was written by one of his friends and should be removed. LJA123 (talk) 08:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Comment: Completing nomination on behalf of tagging editor--above text is copied from article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. @LJA123: For future nominations, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thanks. --Finngall talk 00:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Architecture, and Ghana. Shellwood (talk) 00:23, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Most coverage in the article is related to the grieving of his comrades about his death. In terms of actual impact, he is described as an influential party member of the CPP, but the party doesn't have any seats in the Ghanaian parliament. Fails GNG. Kelob2678 (talk) 08:48, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fade258 (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Francis Xavier Engineering College


    Francis Xavier Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Sri Ragavendra Polytechnic College


    Sri Ragavendra Polytechnic College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    RVS College of Engineering & Technology


    RVS College of Engineering & Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Weak Keep: Found three sources - . I won't say that they are the best sources cuz all are "News Desk" and aren't bylined. But in light of the recent plethora of non-notable institutions at AFD, even this coverage looks good to me to keep the page. If others don't agree, I don't mind a complete deletion. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    RMD Engineering College


    RMD Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Failure of NSCHOOL, V, and GNG Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Rane Polytechnic College


    Rane Polytechnic College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering


    Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG and NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    R.M.K. College of Engineering and Technology


    R.M.K. College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:05, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Weak Keep: Found three sources – . Won't say these are the best sources....graduation day coverage is kinda ROUTINE. But in light of the recent chunk of non-notable educational institutions at AFD, even this much coverage looks good. If others disagree, I don't mind a complete deletion. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Engineering and Technology. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Association of Film Commissioners International


    Association of Film Commissioners International (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NCORP Bryce M (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

    Keep - the organisation's Cineposium has been reported on for over 40 years and currently no separate article. Sudiani (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
    Agreed with keep. There is plenty of reliable sourcing related to the "Cineposium" and other details, including mainstream media reporting that is notable. This makes the page WP:DUE. Just a couple of examples here and here Doctorstrange617 (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 13:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Weak keep The article is largely WP:PROMO but search results indicate that it could be sourced appropriately. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Cside


    Cside (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NCORP. Only 2 of the given sources are independent, of which the company itself only gets passing mentions. Couldn't find any other sources either. SecretSpectre (talk) 09:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

      • Keep.** The nomination fails WP:BEFORE. The nominator has not identified which sources were reviewed, which 2 are considered independent, or demonstrated that cybersecurity trade press (Dark Reading, SC Magazine, SecurityWeek, Help Net Security, The Register) was searched prior to nomination. "Couldn't find any other sources" is not evidence of non-existence, it reflects incomplete research at best.
    WP:NCORP requires significant coverage in independent reliable sources, which exists in the client-side security and PCI DSS v4.0.1 compliance space. The company's connection to the British Airways/Magecart breach has generated independently notable third-party coverage. If the article lacks citations, the correct remedy is improvement, not deletion. Nominating without exhausting WP:BEFORE does not meet the bar for AfD.
    Please clarify which of the sources are considered independent and which aren't so I can review the accuracy. Sharing 'only 2 of the given sources are independent' is not specific enough. Swagmansonsec (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Firstly I'm not sure what connections the company has to the British Airways/Magecart breach you're talking about, it was not mentioned in the article anywhere nor could I find anything other than posts by the CEO here and here. This is still not WP:SIGCOV.
    For the record the source analysis table generator wasn't working for me for whatever reason:
    References:
    External links:
    And please don't use AI to generate arguments in an AfD, or really for any other purpose. SecretSpectre (talk) 22:05, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Thanks for the detailed reply, this is really helpful and exactly what was needed to have a productive conversation.
    On Baways.com - you're right, there is no independent coverage of their ownership. I know them because of the Baways.com domain as it became a bit of cyber security meme and when I bumped into them again after they released the MSclairty intel I felt it was fair to give them some credit. Noted and fair point. I've left that part out. Companies often do press releases for outlets to rewrite them and release them. I understand your perspective but that does not mean that outlets didn't execute editorial review on them or went through a fact-checking process. These points are easily fixable.
      • Keep
    Points worth contesting:
    The nomination relies on an incomplete source review and mischaracterizes at least one of the sources it does cite.
    On the Wired article, I strongly disagree. The piece opens and closes with Simon Wijckmans and cside's security findings. Cside is the central figure of this article throughout. I strongly advice that anyone voting here to actually have a quick read. It is a factually incorrect characterization to call it a 'passing mention'. The Journalist mentioned that he joined calls with cside job applicants. The article is built around the investigation that the journalist executed together with cside.
    Your comment regarding the TechCrunch piece as 'probably the only thing here that comes close to sigcov' is an acknowledgement that at least one strong independent source exists. Since the edit further independent security analyst coverage was added. Together with the Wired Article, ESG, Intelyx, TheHackerNews, PCMag, TheRegister, Forbes, VRT and Mediahuis there is plenty of independent coverage.
    On SecurityWeek, CIO.com, SCWorld: the existence of an advertising sales page does not disqualify a prublication's editorial content under WP:RS. For example, SecurityWeek, CIO.com, TechRadar and many of the other mentioned publications has bylined reporters and a dedicated editorial staff and is routinely accepted as a reliable source in cybersecurity related AfDs and at WP:RSN. Accepting this categorization would require prior community consensus - and if approved would have impact on many cybersecurity related pages on this platform.
    Since the nomination further work has taken place to implement irrefutable independent sources like Forbes, Intellyx, ESG - since part of TechTarget...
    It is also worth noting that by definition security threat intelligence mentions the researchers, either by name or by business, in passing as the prime subject is the exposed vulnerability or incident. Sources like TechRadar and BleepingComputer are industry standard independent outlets and will mention the sources by name but the entire article is built on the research that a party provides.
    The article clearly has gaps but the article is improvable. The correct approach is citation improvement and further edits to add relevant context. Not deletion. The Forbes recognition, the Wired article, the mentions in TechCrunch, TechRadar provide ample coverage for the notability threshold. WP:IMPROVE is a crucially important policy. By pushing back on new pages based on personal opinions and loose terms like 'barely' and dismissing the basis of a story 'a passing mention' or 'I could not find' you discourage the community to contribute. Please feel free to make edits, but AfD should be kept as a last resort. Try to fix problems or flag them if you can. Be helpful: explain. Perhaps flagging an article for AfD when "the table generator wasn't working" can wait until you can generate a table so that your comments are detailed, actionable and understandable.
    No one wants a back and forth. Wikipedia is not a discussion forum but please by all means chime in or provide further feedback to improve the article. Swagmansonsec (talk) 04:12, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    And sorry for the ugly formatting in this thread - I am still learning what is supported in the AfD format. Swagmansonsec (talk) 04:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    The Wired article tells me very little about the company (called "C.side" in the article) that "addresses the topic directly and in detail". This is not significant coverage. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 10:00, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: I don't see any sources in the article or on Google that would pass the notability guidelines for corporations. The articles here seem to be mentions without significant coverage, routine coverage, or in trade publications that don't meet the audience requirements. @Swagmansonsec, I suggest you read them and then come back here with your top sources (see the essay WP:THREE) that you feel demonstrate notability. Reviewers here don't want to have to go through ten sources. IF there are good sources let's see a few. I don't think Techcrunch or Wired article provides significant coverage. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 10:00, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Keep - I have read the concerns of PacificDepth and SecretSpectre in detail and read their shared guidelines and requirements. PacificDepth, thanks for sharing the WP:THREE guideline, I can see how that makes this an easier conversation. As per your request.
    From my understanding and experience WP:SIGCOV requires the subject to be discussed directly and in detail, for which there are many examples.
    1. NRC "Voor je het weet heb je een Noord-koreaan aangenomen als It'er" https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2025/08/07/sollicitant-frank-chang-zit-helemaal-niet-in-texas-en-spreekt-engels-met-een-koreaans-accent-2-a4902369 Cside and its founder are the central subject in this long form investigative feature which includes a cside organized interview with a North Korean actor where the journalist Marloes De Koning was present. The article goes into detail on the internal operations, the technical methods used to detect them at length. Significant - the subject is addressed at length, cside is the leading figure and in detail. Independent and Reliable NRC is the local equivalent of the NYT in the Netherlands. And it counts as Secondary source meeting all requirements for
    2. Wired “North Korea Stole Your Job” https://www.wired.com/story/north-korea-stole-your-tech-job-ai-interviews/ The nomination characterizes this as ‘a passing mention’. That is a factual error. This is a Wired “The Big Story”, their most in depth editorial format, with the founder of cside as the picture. Simon Wijckmans’es name is referenced 19 times, cside once. This is normal, when a CEO of any company is interviewed, the company name may be mentioned 3 times, and the CEO who represents the company plenty more. The company is not a passing mention there either, the same logic applies. In this subject the entire story is built on job applications to cside. Cside is as central here as Wonka in Charlie And The Chocolate Factory. The standard of significant coverage is not how often the name of the company is mentioned but instead the source "addresses the topic directly and in detail." which it clearly did. Independent, Reliable, Significant and Secondary source.
    3. “Vlaamse ondernemer ontmaskert Noord-Koreaanse spionageoperatie” - VRT, Belgians national tax-payer funded press equivalent to the BBC but for Flanders. In this piece the dedicated tech and deep research journalist Tim Verheyden focuses on Cside’s discovery of North Korean job applications. Translated "Flemish entrepreneur unmasks North Korean spy operation."
    Beyond these three: De Morgen, high quality Belgium’s daily newspaper, De Tijd, most significant Belgian business publisher equivalent to the FT but for Belgium. And on top of that Techcrunch, The Hacker News. I understand that press related to funding rounds is not significant, but that makes a job for WP:IMPROVE, not deletion. Many changes have been made since nomination. Strong Keep. Swagmansonsec (talk) 00:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Two sources out of three above that I can access definitely fail WP:CORPDEPTH. One says (Google Translate), Wijckmans is the founder and director of Cside, a young cyber security company, where twenty people now work. This is definitely not a profile of an organization that we usually keep. Kelob2678 (talk) 09:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      Keep: Business size is not a criterion under WP:CORPDEPTH. Notability is defined by the quality of independent sourcing, not headcount. This should not be factored into an AfD discussion.
      Evidence was shared of non-commerical government funded press outlets, there is no question of legitimacy. Wired especially is a highly trustworthy source with fact checkers etc. ~2026-17021-75 (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 13:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: very PROMO, sourced to articles about other things, where this company is only mentioned. No articles that focus on the company, in my search either, only PR items. Oaktree b (talk) 14:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      Keep - the statement 'very PROMO' is not substantiated by evidence or links. Please share specific quotes or links. WP:PROMO is resolved by editing, not by deletion. This is not helpful and against guidelines.
      Wired, NRC and De Morgen all have cside as their central subject. The existence of some PR material does not discredit other sources. ~2026-17021-75 (talk) 00:32, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Robert B. Tucker

    AfDs for this article:
    Robert B. Tucker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    All coverage I was able to find was either routine in nature, non-independent, or not enough to meet the mark for in-depth coverage. The company he founded, Shoe Show, is possibly notable (though I'm not completely convinced there), but notability isn't inherited. There is some coverage in shoe sales industry publications, but it's largely just passing mentions or routine business announcements. There are a couple of obituaries for the subject in shoe industry publications, but even there only a couple aren't just re-prints of the company's obituary that was issued as a press release. Brought to AFD after redirect to Shoe Show was reverted. nf utvol (talk) 03:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Speedy Keep This guy founded a show store chain that has thousands of locations in america, and sells over a million pairs a shoes per week. Rather then looking for individual sources look at what this guy did, not to mention there is a book about him literally titled 'Under the Radar' because he declined being in the news, and media attention.
    JECWV (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    The store he founded may indeed be notable, but notability is not inherited. Regardless of what the person did, there must be significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. The book you mentioned is also not appropriate for contributing to notability, as it is neither independent nor a reliable source since it appears to have been commissioned and published by the company he founded. nf utvol (talk) 15:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment: The first nomination appears to have been for an article on someone else by this name (albeit also a businessman). No opinion on the current article/subject. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:12, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Shoe Show as an WP:ATD. The article is sourced to obits, the only independent coverage is from the trade press and a blog section of an outlet named Business North Carolina. The book may be a great source, but it is hard to assess whether it is independent and how much coverage it has on him compared to the company. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      Here are a few articles I have scrolled upon for this conversation:
      JECWV (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      The Yahoo article and WWD article (both actually re-prints from Footwear News) are both trade press obituaries, so I'm skeptical of how much they should be used to establish notability. The Gardner-Webb article is largely a re-print from the funeral home website mixed in with the discussion about his donation to the school and is also of questionable utility in establishing notability. nf utvol (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      His donation to the school made coverage of him not independent, hence useless for notability. Footwear News coverage is the trade press coverage I mentioned. You said above that he had a low-profile life and avoided the press. This may be admirable, but from the Wikipedia perspective, this means that there is a very low chance of inclusion. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 13:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Brother Mouzone


    Brother Mouzone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    This is entirely written as an in-universe summary. Unlike other characters such as Omar Little or even Avon Barksdale who have some production detail included in their pages. Mpen320 (talk) 00:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete due to a lack of independent sources. Is in universe writing grounds for deletion? SenshiSun (talk) 01:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    In and of itself, being written entirely in-universe is theoretically enough of a fixable issue that the mantra of "AfD is not cleanup" would apply. If there isn't enough sourcing to meet notability guidelines, or sufficient encyclopedic information to avoid falling under NOPAGE, that's another matter. (I have no opinion at this time.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Wcquidditch is correct regarding in-universe itself not being a sole reason to delete. I was alluding to a lack of sourcing. I should have been more specific.--Mpen320 (talk) 13:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete as WP:FANCRUFT without outside or significant coverage. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 00:36, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep or draftify. The article currently isn't well enough sourced, but sources exist. We have this from the Australian Museum of Screen Culture. There is a hell of a lot about him on Google Scholar. I've not been through the original articles, but there look to be at least a few non-trivial mentions there. I think it passes WP:GNGBoynamedsue (talk) 08:40, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Pallavan Engineering College


    Pallavan Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL Filmssssssssssss (talk) 13:29, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete this and all related pages per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    I am also nominating the following related pages because they also all fail WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL as poorly written Indian engineering colleges:

    University College of Engineering, Pattukkottai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Ultra College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Adhiparasakthi Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Government College of Engineering, Thanjavur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    University College of Engineering, Arni (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    J.P. College of Engineering, Ayikudy, Tenkasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Indra Ganesan College of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Government Polytechnic College, Nagercoil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
    Thiruvalluvar College of Engineering and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Loyola School, Baripada


    Loyola School, Baripada (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Redirect to List of Jesuit educational institutions#Odisha 2. Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Redirect per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:14, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    St. Joseph's Convent Higher Secondary School, Sambalpur


    St. Joseph's Convent Higher Secondary School, Sambalpur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Redirect to Sambalpur#Education. Fails in GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. BhikhariInformer (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Redirect per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    SM Forhad


    SM Forhad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Per WP:NPOL such elected position holders are not notable. Case of WP:ONEEVENT Rht bd (talk) 12:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Education, and Bangladesh. Rht bd (talk) 12:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: Not seeing sources with significant coverage, the Dhaka University Central Students' Union article has a one-line entry listing the elected officials per year which is about all that's warranted here. Not covered by WP:NPOL, fails WP:GNG. Ravensfire (talk) 13:15, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: Student union leaders aren't notable under NPOL and there isn't much else to show this is a notable individual. Oaktree b (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Doesn't meet NPOL and the only possibly-notable event is the controversy, which would fall under ONEEVENT anyway. There's not much else to say since there's so little here. BTW I have concerns re. a possible COI and warned the article creator accordingly. Blue Sonnet (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL another student article. Dr vulpes (Talk) 15:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Kheireddine Tunisian International School


    Kheireddine Tunisian International School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Redirect to List of schools in Tunisia as an ATD-R. Fails in GNG as well as WP:NSCHOOL. Tagged for being unsourced for 10 years. Didn't find anything useful in my BEFORE. Won't mind withdrawing if sources are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Institute for East West Strategic Studies


    Institute for East West Strategic Studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NORG. Sources in the article consistently lack any reference to the organisation, or do so only as a function of its director’s previous work. Search for WP:BEFORE does not turn up any reliable secondary or tertiary sources on the organisation or its work. Legislate1754 (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    İlknur Demirkoparan


    İlknur Demirkoparan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Falls short of WP:N/CREATIVE by the looks of it. KH-1 (talk) 11:50, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Kiewiet Lengana Pali


    Kiewiet Lengana Pali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Name-checked as a coach for possibly notable artists, but no SIGCOV. Likely to fail WP:NBIO. KH-1 (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Delete per nom. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Delete - per nom.
    The "Teaching philosophy" and "Notable students" sections have the classic ChatGPT "Bold and Bullet Point" paragraphs. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Hi. You have clearly missed the part where in mentioned that he coached the likes of Masabane Cecilia Rangwanasha who is a South African soprano and is the winner of the BBC Cardiff Singer of the World . The list extend to Nkululeko Masuku finalist on Britain’s Got Talent 2024. These are two South Africans who were coached by Pali. I dispute this nomination for deletion as you want to overlook his work and influence over the two South African exports. KeMang?? (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Internal Shuttle Bus


    Internal Shuttle Bus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Article isn't notable enough to warrant a page of an internal bus shuttle service of a university. Most of the sources are blogs or primary sources with very few mentions by news outlets. Might also propose a merge under facilities of National University of Singapore or similar. ZKang123 (talk · contribs) 11:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2026 March 17. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 11:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete, regardless of sources, there are some subjects that are hardly the material for an encyclopedia. There must be tens of thousands of organisations, including many universities, that offer some sort of shuttle bus service between bits of themselves, or other places their users/students/employees want to go. This is a completely run of the mill thing to happen. At the very least, the article would have to be moved to a title specifying which internal shuttle bus you're talking about. But in a university, we very often don't even consider individual academic departments notable independent of the university itself; regarding their internal bus service as independently notable would take something truly extraordinary. Elemimele (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete most of the sources are orange/yellow and one red one, showing marginal to unacceptable notability... This reads as an advertisement for what amounts to a shuttle service, offered at pretty much any campus/airport/education institution/large factory complex. I guess with decent sourcing, there could be something here, but beyond basic name drops or DICDEF, I don't see much online that we could use to build an article here with. Oaktree b (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Merge to National University of Singapore#Transportation. Some of the sources are usable and the section could be expanded instead. ~ JASWE (talk) 03:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
      Note section has been moved to Facilities of the National University of Singapore#Transportation. ~ JASWE (talk) 07:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Merge information to National University of Singapore#Transportation as above, then redirect page to Shuttle bus as the title doesn't specify anything as to this particular university. Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. Talk to me. 07:29, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Amy Leach (theatre director)


    Amy Leach (theatre director) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Sources are routine mentions and cursory research failed to uncover enough evidence of a pass under WP:GNG (I did find an interview from the Lancashire Telegraph but that was about it).

    This was nominated for deletion once before a number of years back and kept, partly on the basis of the article subject being director of a production that won an award Leonstojka (talk) 11:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Keep Needs updating, but the included sources are pretty significant mentions and it looks like more can be found. Tioaeu8943 (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Knoxboro, New York


    Knoxboro, New York (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails WP:NPLACE Bryce M (talk) 11:20, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    I don't see the harm in keeping this page if we can find reliable sources to justify its existence. Information about places is valuable for readers who want to learn more. There seem to be relevant news stories out there, like this one: https://www.uticaod.com/story/mid-york-weekly/2020/11/16/knoxboro-nys-north-road-under-major-construction/6310217002/ Doctorstrange617 (talk) 14:25, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • comment Aerials plainly show that there is a town at this location. We just need documentation. Mangoe (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep. I've found and added several sources to the article. Most notably, I think, the hamlet has a relatively important geologic/paleontological site named after it, as well as an extinct coral species. Altogether, though, I hope my edits are able to demonstrate that Knoxboro is "given non-trivial coverage by [its] name in multiple, independent reliable sources" per WP:NPLACE. DuckWrangler97 (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep: Current sourcing shows it meets notability requirements.--Milowent • hasspoken 19:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Sourcing added to easily put this over the top (along with a lacking rationale; please explain further beyond a WP: drop next time, please, we need a proper explaination as to why the nomination has been placed). Nathannah • 📮 20:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep per above and improvements made. ← Metallurgist (talk) 03:24, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Plenty of sources now. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:33, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Shi Chunlai


    Shi Chunlai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Unsourced and unverified résumé. Ambassadors are not inherently notable and must meet WP:NBIO. AusLondonder (talk) 09:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 09:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete - I am not able to verify this information, in the event this can be verified, it is likely that this article can qualify WP:NPOL. signed, Kvinnen (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      I can't see anything in the article that suggests he meets NPOL. AusLondonder (talk) 10:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Comment: Note that the tag for potential NBIO failure has been present since November 2016, in an article created in August 2016. Our tolerance for substandard biographies, already low to start with, has only evaporated in that decade. (No opinion beyond that.) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:58, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: China, Australia, and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete Zero coverage found in Gnews and the one source in the article isn't liked, so I can't verify it, but it's only one source regardless. As explained above, tagged for a decade with no improvement, time for deletion. Oaktree b (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Hawkman (Carter Hall)


    Hawkman (Carter Hall) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    The usual plot summary and list of appearances, with zero academic analysis or even reception. My BEFORE failed to find anything useful (the best I got is this Screenrant article, and it's mostly rehash of plot summary: ). WP:ATD-R points to a List of DC Comics characters. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

    Redirect to Hawkman, where this identity is described in depth. The alias of Hawkman is likely notable, but I doubt Hall is individually notable of the wider identity. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 03:43, 3 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Portrayed by Aldis Hodge in Black Adam (2022), generating independent film coverage and analysis. 85-year publication history (1940). Screen Rant and other outlets covered the character's film adaptation in depth. Article needs reception/analysis added per WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM, not deletion. Sparks19923 (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
      @Sparks19923 Valnet sources cannot be used to show notability per Wikipedia:VALNET. Just because a character appeared in a film does not mean they are instantly notable, and a smattering of situational sources or ROUTINE coverage would not dispel that notion. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 01:23, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
    Fair point on WP:VALNET; I withdraw the Screen Rant cite and I'm not relying on Valnet for notability.
    The question is whether the character meets WP:GNG / WP:NFC via significant, independent reliable coverage beyond routine cast/plot mentions. There is at least some such coverage: The Hollywood Reporter ran a substantial feature discussing the character's publication history and significance, not just the film appearance (Graeme McMillan, "The Many Lives of 'Black Adam' Hero Hawkman").
    I've also located an EBSCO Research Starters background/reference entry (Hawkman (character)), which may be useful for basic context but I agree it should not be treated as strong evidence of independent notability on its own.
    I'll add these (and continue looking for additional non-Valnet independent coverage) and expand Reception/Analysis accordingly. If, after that pass, the sourcing is still mostly routine/trivial, I'd support a redirect/merge to Hawkman per the suggestion above. Sparks19923 (talk) 01:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
    @Sparks19923 Both of these are about the Hawkman identity, largely, and discuss Hall as part of that identity. Most of this is just discussing the evolution of the role overtime, rather than putting significant discussion of Hall separately from Hawkman (Wikipedia:SIGCOV). This seems very much a Wikipedia:NOPAGE situation. Why split Hall out when he's only notable as being one of the identities of Hawkman, and is only discussed within the context of Hawkman's wider history?
    Hawkman is definitely notable, but is Hall independently notable of Hawkman? My wager is probably not. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:23, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect/Merge with Hawkman page. Since I had last edited the Hawkman page, I felt pretty confident you could merge both versions of the character into the page and treat it as a immortal warrior reincarnating multiple times. Unlike the Kendra version, which her story includes distancing and being more independent form her past lives, Hawkman in general has consistencies and addressing descrepancies is not out of the question.
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 04:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Servite et contribuere (talk) 08:26, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Merge and redirect - in fact the content of this appears to be partially merged already. It doesn't make sense to write a separate article for one of two forms of a character based on a few marginal sources. NotBartEhrman (talk) 13:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to Hawkman - Already sufficiently covered at the article on the main topic. The actual sourced publication information and such is already covered there, and the remainder of this article is simply overly detailed plot summaries and "lists of appearances" that are either unsourced or sourced only to primary sources. 21:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Brzeźna (hill)


    Brzeźna (hill) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    I have failed to determine where this hill is located. Either it does not exist or it does not meet WP:GNG/WP:GEONATURAL. FromCzech (talk) 06:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    I agree. Correct is Grzbietnik. Sorry for mixing it um. Input Zoom (talk) 12:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete— Article was created by accident. Fcstmani (talk) 19:47, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Sateliti

    AfDs for this article:
    Sateliti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Only source is Discogs. My WP:BEFORE found nothing to indicate WP:GNG, let alone WP:CREATIVE. WidgetKid Converse 05:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    I don't know Wikipedia policies very much and don't know if this is relevant, but Sateliti is quite a famous band in Bosnia, with many of their videos having more than 1M views on YouTube (the most famous, quoted in the Wikipedia article, has 18M). Freeno (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    @Freeno, do you have reliable, independent sources covering the band we could leverage? YouTube view counts don't establish notability. WidgetKid Converse 18:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Dream Garden


    Dream Garden (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Likely to fail WP:NCORP KH-1 (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

    The result was delete. Star Mississippi 13:36, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Jurgita Mačikunytė

    Jurgita Mačikunytė (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Fails in WP:GNG / lacks WP:SIGCOV. Svartner (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Lithuania. Svartner (talk) 06:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep - there seems to be some coverage, including multiple sources that confirm basic facts. This is much better sourced than 95% of such sports biographies. Bearian (talk) 11:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete - Fails GNG. Sources present in article are just stats. Dougal18 (talk) 11:21, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:08, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete per Dougal18. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 16:09, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete - I was able to retrieve some coverage from tv3.lt but the most in-depth it got was the player scoring 7 goals in an 11–1 Lithuanian league match in 2007. Sources already on the page are primary and do not count towards notability. C679 12:05, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

    Ryan Berryman


    Ryan Berryman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Declined PROD but that was my mistake - I should have nominated for speedy deletion under A7 - no indication of importance. Non-notable university administrator. Orange sticker (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    Ryan Berryman is a notable university administrator. He is the athletic director at the University of New Mexico. ~2026-15013-87 (talk) 15:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Speedy Keep SK1 nom has provided no rationale for the AfD nom; a CSD would have been even more inappropriate. A quick WP:Before indicates some coverage, no indication that the nom did a proper search. I think the nom is a new, overenthusiastic WP:NPP who is being too hasty.Ldm1954 (talk) 02:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      Can you show me which WP:N criteria this person meets? 6c of WP:NPROF states Lesser administrative posts (provost, dean, department chair, etc.) are generally not sufficient to qualify under Criterion 6 alone, although exceptions are possible on a case-by-case basis (e.g., being a provost of a major university may sometimes qualify). I carried out WP:BEFORE and could only find WP:ROTM "man accepts job" type announcements in the press, nothing to indicate the subject had achieved anything remarkable in their field. This reads like a WP:RESUME of a non-notable member of university staff. Orange sticker (talk) 07:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      He isn’t just a random university staff member. Ryan Berryman is the Vice President and Director of Athletics at the University of New Mexico, which is the person in charge of the entire athletic department. That’s the top leadership role for athletics at a Division I university. College athletics today especially at the Division I level are major parts of universities and involve large budgets, NIL programs, media deals, and conference relationships. The athletic director oversees all of that. Also, many athletic directors at comparable Division I schools have their own Wikipedia pages, because the role is a major leadership position within university athletics, not a lower-level administrative job like a dean or department chair. ~2026-15013-87 (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      Can you objectively demonstrate how they meet WP:ANYBIO or if there is a specialised notability category that applies here? He doesn't meet WP:NCOLLATH and there does not seem to be any WP:SIGCOV of his career as a director, coach or athlete. Orange sticker (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
      I don't see a pass of WP:NPROF here, and in particular I don't think athletic directors are presumed notable (for that matter, I don't think that they are academics in the sense of NPROF). No opinion on possible GNG notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Weak delete. CSD is definitely inapplicable but we should still discuss notability. There appears to be no grounds for NPROF notability here so we should go with GNG. There is news coverage of him, but it appears to all be centered on him being hired as athletic director (and therefore also leaving his old job), so I think there is a WP:BIO1E issue here. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Marginal Keep. There was previous coverage when he left UNM in 2024 and moved the University of Washington. He was also surprisingly influential as a student trustee back in the 2010s, a position to which he was appointed by the governor.(ProQuest 1778395740, ProQuest 1785201945, ProQuest 1829049926, ). There was an article when he was named associate athletic director at UNM in 2019 (ProQuest 2231518682). Jahaza (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Weak keep - arguably, VP of athletics is more important for enrollment management than any other administrator, since sports are essential to admissions to a selective university today. Bearian (talk) 13:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete: Reads like a resume and doesn't really explain why this person is notable. Doesn't pass PROF, doesn't seem to have led any "dynasties" in university sports, just a simple administrative job (as it reads currently). Coverage above is fine, but I'm not sure the position is notable. Oaktree b (talk) 13:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Flowery Field Cricket Club


    Flowery Field Cricket Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    No indication of Notability; see this web search which excludes social media. I am not knowledgeable about cricket, but I suspect this should redirect to one of these:

    There is as yet no article for Greater Manchester Cricket League which this club may belong to. Thanks. Mathglot (talk) 19:06, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    That's definitely the case. Back then, it was quantity before quality, and pretty much anything goes as far as notability was concerned. I know I created stuff myself that I wouldn't consider nowadays, ha! Jack (talk) 12:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
    I tried to find old, small, cricket stubs with this Petscan, but I'm rusty with Petscan and for some reason it isn't obeying the 'older than' constraint, but the results are still interesting. Examining the eight articles shows a mixed bag, with some of them having references pointing to other Wikipedia articles, and others to sources with passing mentions about a final score in some match. I learned from that search that some cricket clubs go back to the mid-18th century, and although that is interesting, I don't know if age alone is sufficient to establish notability. If there is no standalone notability for the older clubs, maybe they could be redirected to a section in the History of cricket dealing with early clubs, and list them there. Mathglot (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    I think Bromley, Epsom, Greenwich, and Westminster probably have notability because of their historic status. They were all important clubs in the 18th century, especially Bromley which was Robert Colchin's club. I'm not sure about the South African Army team, but the British Army team seems to be acceptable. South Northumberland and Tynemouth are certainly minor, I think, and I'd support those being redirected to a suitable list. I don't think I've ever used Petscan, and I didn't know it's still available. Jack (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Zee Magic


    Zee Magic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Non-notable TV channel. Just announcements and primary sources. Zuck28 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    It's a brand of Zee, treated under NCORP. However, it also fails GNG as there is nothing in-depth that is independent. Also, not offering an ATD is not ignoring it. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect or Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 00:21, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    ABP Asmita


    ABP Asmita (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    No significant coverage in reliable sources. Just WP:ROUTINE. Zuck28 (talk) 20:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Ryan Busse


    Ryan Busse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Current congressional candidate. Lacks WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:NPOL EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 03:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Draftify - two sources are results pages which don't define notability, two are WP:MILL routine election coverage, other two are interviews which are moreso about his book than him and I don't think they nudge him over the line to notability. Suggesting draftifying as an WP:ATD so the creator can continue to work on it in the meantime, as there is scope for the subject becoming notable in the future. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:51, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Draftify: Possibly move to an article about the memoir. I argue the NYT and NPR articles are really about the memoir Gunfight, which is notable. The candidacies are not notable. (It's interesting for me to argue that the memoir is notable but not the author. Inside Category:Memoirs, Bigmama Didn't Shop at Woolworth's and Along the Roaring River are examples.) 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 04:47, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Muhammad Mohiuddin Khan


    Muhammad Mohiuddin Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Gained news coverage for only one event. Per WP:POLITICIAN, being elected in such student union can not be considered notable. Rht bd (talk) 02:59, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Speedy delete as non notable. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    Delete not notable but could be one day, this is a student role not a real elected role. Dr vulpes (Talk) 04:55, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Delete, fails WP:NPOL "Just being an elected local official, or an unelected candidate for political office, does not guarantee notability". He hasn't done anything other than be elected yet. SecretSpectre (talk) 06:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Storybook World


    Storybook World (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Unsourced since 2006. Fails WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 01:56, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Michael S. Engel


    Michael S. Engel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Significant portions and overall volume of the article are likely COI editing by Engel himself or by close associates, almost all IP edits have come from the Lawrence, Kansas area. Additionally there is no significant coverage of Engel in neutral secondary sources. Kevmin § 01:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, Kansas, Missouri, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep. He has enormous citation counts for a taxonomist, easily enough for WP:PROF#C1, his multiple society fellowships also pass WP:PROF#C3, and his University Distinguished Professor title passes WP:PROF#C5. Any one of these would be enough. The badly justified nomination fails to address the correct notability criterion, WP:PROF, for which independent secondary sources are totally irrelevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep. Agree with editor David Eppstein above. I think consensus should continue as it has been implied for more than 20 years, the life span of this article on WP. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 06:41, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      If this is your reasoning, then I have a fairly serious question: given that the page was created by Micael Engel, and all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel, aren't you giving a green light to any editor who decides that they are notable, and take steps to maintain therir own self-edited article without interference via anonymous IP edits? This article has been flagged - appropriately, given what WHOIS says about the IP edits - as a COI issue for over fifteen years. Why was it not deleted long ago? Again, if the only reason you are voting to keep is because the article has not been deleted yet, that does not seem appropriate for a self-created and self-edited article. Dyanega (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      It's simply not true that "all of the substantive edits and additions to it were contributed by Michael Engel" -- see January 2023 for example. Athel cb (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      Yes, the edits in January 2023 are a good example. All of these were changes to existing text, mostly providing citations, not the addiion of new material. Fixing a bad or broken citation is not a substantive edit, it is routine maintenance. That list of eponyms was added in edits by Engel himself, nearly always via the anonymous IP addresses in Kansas. Prior to that January 2023 set of edits, several eponyms had been added in a spate of edits June of 2022, from a dial-up in Miami, when Engel was attending the meeting of the Florida Entomological Society (see this edit history). Coincidence? Note the content and targets of all of those edits. Is it odd that no one ever suggested the article be deleted back then? Maybe, but I don't see how that justifies letting COI abuse be "grandfathered in" just because no one called for deletion before. Dyanega (talk) 17:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep. Regardless of who created the article and who subsequently edited it, the GoogleScholar record is very impressive. h = 70 is a lot for an entomologist. (It would be very respectable, though not stupendous, for a biochemist, a subject I know more about, but it is more than just respectable in a lower-citation field.) Notice also that a high proportion of the well cited papers have one or two authors, so it's pretty clear that he did much or most of the work. A curious point that I noticed is that the editor who now wants the article deleted made a series of eleven edits in January 2023 with no suggestion that it should be deleted. Athel cb (talk) 17:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      It should be noted that a notable portion of the later papers in the CV are published though a journal that Engel personally started and served as chief editor of, removing the peer-review portion of the science entirely. Actively avoiding peer-review to increase the paper count is not a good situation.--Kevmin § 17:24, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
      The highest number of citations is for a Cambridge University Press book, and the highly-cited articles are in journals including PNAS and Nature. In this situation, I don't see how his also publishing in a journal he edited affects the determination of notability (particularly since we don't even need to look at C1). Nor do I think that publishing in a journal one co-founded is necessarily unethical. If it's the Journal of Melittology you mean, everyone's status seems to be declared above board. His papers from the period when he was chief editor say that he was chief editor (for example). It's not substantially different from having a departmental newsletter or posting notes on one's own faculty website, only it's packaged as a journal for convenience. Maybe that's shady, maybe not; it's up to the scientists in that field to determine whether they're using that journal to push bad papers. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Question. What is the policy-based reason for deletion here? Unclear whether the rationale is lack of notability or something else. YFB ¿ 18:43, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Keep Passes WP:PROF on two criteria (C3 and C5) independent of citations. The existing text isn't so bad that problems with it can't be fixed through ordinary cleanup. Stepwise Continuous Dysfunction (talk) 20:28, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Unsure I don't think there is an issue of notability as an academic taxonomist. He was co-author on Evolution of Insects and has papers in major journals. If the article was written by neutral editors, there would be no problem. But it wasn't. I think the issue of COI with a large number of IP edits is a major problem, which doesn't go away just because it's being going on so long. A long history of COI doesn't make it less of an issue. It seems that keeping the article would be rewarding the violation of COI rules, although the article is not unacceptable. Keeping the article does add something to the encyclopaedia (hence keep), but overlooking violations of the rules doesn't help the credibility of Wikipedia (hence delete).  —  Jts1882 | talk  09:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Also Unsure and for the same reasons Jts1882 gives; the notability issue is a bit of a distraction, but I'll say that he is not more notable than a large number of other entomologists who have no entry in Wikipedia at all. Yes, I know quite well that this is not how things work, and it's a logical fallacy. "Person X has a Wikipedia article, but person Y is more notable and does not" is, all things being equal, a terrible argument. The difference here is that the only reason this particular person HAS a Wikipedia article is because he created it, and maintained it, and added to it for a very long time. In other words, all things are NOT equal here. This brings me to a question that I hope someone can answer: is it possible to permanently block an article from anonymous edits? If Engel cannot be prevented from anonymously editing this article, then I would vote to delete it rather than allow him to continue to do so; if a block CAN be instituted, then I would vote to keep. Dyanega (talk) 15:40, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
      @Dyanega: Yes it is possible, the article would need to be at least semi-protected to prevent new or unregistered users from editing it (see Wikipedia:Protection policy). Monster Iestyn (talk) 16:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

    The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Raskuly (talk) 01:21, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Carlos Mercado

    AfDs for this article:
    Carlos Mercado (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Mercado appears to fail WP:BIO guidelines on all fronts, with the best independent and secondary coverage about him appearing to be this piece from the Laredo Morning Times about him signing for the Laredo Heat, but it is a fairly routine transfer story.

    This is an old article created by me when I was less familiar with notability guidelines, but because of its age and edits from other users I can't nominate it for speedy deletion. Raskuly (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Comment I did find this immediately after nomination: https://www.lmtonline.com/local/article/soccer-b-goalie-goalkeeper-contract-next-lions-mls-20201755.php Raskuly (talk) 01:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

    Highfather


    Highfather (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Another non-notable comic character (hundreds done, hundreds more to go, I fear). Plot summary, no analysis/reception, nothing SIGCOV-meeting in my BEFORE. We can ATD-R to List of DC Comics characters: H, I guess. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 01:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    • Merge and redirect to List of DC Comics characters: H as an alternative to deletion. -- Fiction Fanatic III (talk) 10:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to New Gods#New Gods of New Genesis where the various named New Gods, including Highfather, are already listed and described. Searches using both his title and real name of ""Izaya" are not really showing much in the way of significant coverage on the character. The coverage in reliable sources is pretty much limited to plot summaries and mentions in discussions of the concept of the New Gods as a whole. Rorshacma (talk) 14:34, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    • Redirect to New Gods#New Gods of New Genesis agree that the New Gods article is a better redirect target than a huge DC character list. Those should be avoided whenever possible. Rhino131 (talk) 13:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
    The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

    The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:15, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

    Carolyn A. Brent

    Carolyn A. Brent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    I have been unable to find significant coverage of this person in reliable sources. Most of the sources are media interviews about her work. I do not believe that she independently meets the notability guideline for authors. I removed some promotional content from the article prior to nominating, but I don't think that the sources I removed establish notability. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

    P.S. The "Caregiver's Story" and legislative committee websites do not contribute to notability, because they are primary sources. Also, I first testified before the New York State Assembly at the age of 24; it's run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 14:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
    Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
    Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
    Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:53, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
    The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

    James Goll


    James Goll (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    There are serious issues with this page and seem to have been for almost two decades. It is unclear whether the subject passes notability. It seems as though WP:AUTHOR would apply most obviously here, but other than writing a large quantity of books, they don't seem like a significant body of work. In searching for independent sources to establish notability more generally, it doesn't seem as though there are any other than sites affiliated with his particular religious sect, and no news articles from reputable sources. PA Uploader (talk) 00:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Robert V. Lee


    Robert V. Lee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Nominating this for deletion on behalf of User:Readwritehistory. The original talk page message gave this reason: This biography is non-notable and a lot of the content lists the subject's non-profit as the citation. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    In the first place, there is no concept of the same platform across model changes. For the reason, please see the talk page of the relevant article. Oq10pass (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

    Nissan S platform


    Nissan S platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)
    (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

    Related Articles

    Wikiwand AI