Wikipedia:Content assessment/Requests

• Requesting assessment of Villainous (board game). O2Q357Ys 18:00, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as start class. Can you find some sales info? I think that would bump it up to C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:48, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of David Connolly (cattleman). Qwerty123M (talk) 09:06, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Hannah Spencer. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:29, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. @Qwerty123M Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:54, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Newcastle Art Gallery. Article looks to be at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of La Ofis (Chilean TV series), i belive it is either start class or C. Robert Motecinos Holda (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done by @Robert Motecinos Holda, who assessed as Start class, which I agree with. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:40, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Superconducting quantum computing from Start class after significant updates. Thank you. Electronblues (talk) 22:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Still incredibly technical, too much so for the general reader. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Panguna Mine against B-Class criterion following recent updates. Thank you. ~2026-11901-18 (talk) 14:38, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of The Philadelphia Inquirer Sudoku National Championship. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as Start. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Ipplepen against B-Class criterion following recent expansion of content, referencing and reorganisation. Thank you. Prspiring (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C. Prspiring Added "cn" tags. JoeNMLC (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Tennis Australia. Article looks to be at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as such. GoldRomean (talk) 01:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Ranajit Malla. Jujubhaju (talk) 01:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C. GoldRomean (talk) 01:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of C.F. Mott College of Education. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:19, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as Start class. Pietrus1 (talk) 05:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of 2026 Pawtucket shooting as the article was rated very quickly after its creation and it has been expanded much since then. Raskuly (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as B. GoldRomean (talk) 01:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Icon (computing). Should be changed from Start to C or even B. SomnambulantFish _talk ∫ ^contribs 11:18, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

   Not done for now, for the cleanup tags and significant amount of uncited information still remaining. Best, GoldRomean (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Menewood Hawksquill (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C. GoldRomean (talk) 15:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Yvonne Walker Hawksquill (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Gopal Raj Vamshavali. Jujubhaju (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, as C. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Bhaktapur. Jujubhaju (talk) 20:14, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:00, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of New South Wales R set. Is this article ready for start-class? It seems to have enough sources and details. Qwerty123M (talk) 07:45, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed as Start-class. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Catalysis software design method. Qwerty123M (talk) 07:29, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed as Stub-class. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of WOM (Chile). Seems to be Start class. Robert Motecinos Holda (talk) 03:59, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed as C-class. Good job! NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of 2023 San Pedro de la Paz railway Accident. Robert Motecinos Holda (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

  Already done: Already assessed as B-class.NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Triple J's Hottest 100 of 2018. All Hottest 100 articles might need a reassessment of their classification because some are list-class but most of them use more regular classifications such as start. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed as C-class. Some statements are lacking citations. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting am assessment of Super-complaint - hopefully pulled in enough to move it out of stub-class Brianstan14 (talk) 19:11, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed as Start-class. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting a reassessment of Officer-involved domestic violence, believing the context / reorganization possibly substantiates the removal of the u.s. centric bias disclaimer and upgrade out of c class. Brianstan14 (talk) 19:08, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

   Not done: I agree with its current C-class rating. The article should be expanded to cover more countries if possible. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting a reassessment of Daughters, Inc. and just checking my request on Feb 9 for Sinister Wisdom hasn't fallen between the cracks Hawksquill (talk) 17:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: reassessed as C-class, the only issue is that each entry of the list of publications should have an inline citation. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of TOI-4342, I'm convinced I've nursed it beyond the Stub-class I found it in originally Slovborg (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Pietrus1 (talk) 05:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Rory Amon, looks to be at least start-class, I'm sure the article will be expanded further as the trial of this former MP progresses. Qwerty123M (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

  Already done by @Cameron Dewe, who assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 09:25, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting Assessment of Kidnapping of Arbel Yehoud from C-Class to B-Class EaglesFan37 (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done Assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Paul Alan Levy. Qwerty123M (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:44, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Confederation of Central America 02:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC) Grandly and Sincerely, Informing and Uniting. (talk) 19:08, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as start. There are some other wikipedia entries for national projects which were not fully realized. This article probably needs to be restructured a lot more like those. Much of the information there currently is unclear to me despite the quantity. Take a look at for various examples of how this sort of situation is handled. Please amend the article a bit in light of that. Pietrus1 (talk) 04:56, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Kim Williams (architect). Qwerty123M (talk) 02:39, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as start. GoldRomean (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Emi Nitta. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:22, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done assessed from Stub to Start-class. Rater tool predicts as C-class, however article needs additional references. JoeNMLC (talk) 23:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Requesting reassessment of the following articles:

• Hinatazaka46

 Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Nao Kosaka

 Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

• Miku Kanemura

   Not done still Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 20:43, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

• Mirei Sasaki

  Already done - JoeNMLC (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Konoka Matsuda

  Already done - JoeNMLC (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Kyōko Saitō

  Already done - JoeNMLC (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Moka Kamishiraishi

  Already done - JoeNMLC (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

• Yūka Kageyama

•  Done assessed as C class for now. Added talk feedback for B-class review. JoeNMLC (talk) 15:43, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Hope it's okay to post multiple articles as all of these have been greatly expanded since their previous assessments. Thank you. PetéWarrior (talk) 03:18, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• @Petewarrior it is easier for reviewers if you put each article request in it's own request line. This way reviewers can keep up with what is done easier. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Thank you for the feedback, reorganized. PetéWarrior (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Added the B-class review template to Talk:Yūka Kageyama and Talk:Kyōko Saitō to gather suggestions for improvement. Please also advise whether there's a separate process to obtain B class. PetéWarrior (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

  This is the review page for up-to-B assessment. Pietrus1 (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of 2026 Terrebonne federal by-election. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Australia at the 2026 Winter Olympics, article looks like it should be rated at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:04, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:54, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Sydney Cup. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Could use some more secondary sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 04:48, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Randwick Racecourse, this article seems to be well-detailed enough to receive a C-class rating. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C, though ideally the orange cleanup banner should be addressed. GoldRomean (talk) 03:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Rosehill Gardens Racecourse. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as start. GoldRomean (talk) 03:36, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Rosehill Guineas, this article seems to have enough content for start-class or above. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as start. GoldRomean (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Golden Slipper Stakes, this article seems like it has enough content for start-class or above. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as start. @Qwerty123M, I've no problem with you continuing to post here if you wish, but you're always free to try your hand at boldly assessing these yourself too ;). GoldRomean (talk) 03:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

  I have been feeling that I should start assessing articles since I have some knowledge of what the assessment process would involve but I'm afraid I will not judge the criteria against the article fairly. When I create articles, I am afraid of adding a biased rating. I feel quite bad for having used this page so heavily instead of rating articles myself because I know that I might be wasting editors' time. I also feel like the judgement process may be too hard.

  What I'm saying is that I might need help interpreting the guidelines so I can start rating articles efficiently myself. The main thing I am confused about is what the difference between C and B class is. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:59, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

  Don't worry about it; especially below GA, ratings are no big deal. WP:BCRIT's nice because it's fairly detailed; if you think an article meets it, you can assess as B-class. Though again, if you want to keep using this page you're free to—I certainly don't consider it a waste of my time :). GoldRomean (talk) 19:38, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Australian Turf Club, this article looks like at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, as start. GoldRomean (talk) 03:32, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Timofei Moșneaga. Multiple noteworthy edits were made following its C grade assignment. Thank you. Editor1722 (talk) 23:16, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

   Not done, most of the body lacks inline citations. TeoTB (talk) 04:45, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

• Reassesment request for Patum de Berga. Currently start-class, have expanded the article and added some references to it. Thanks. Vidre de Rellotge // I festa noi! 11:29, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

   Not done as this is still Start class. Some areas unsourced still. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Jason Hirschhorn. I have expanded the article. Its currently rated as stub-class. JesseL0vesT0ast (May the toast be with you.) (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done: C-class. Warriorglance(talk to me) 16:46, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Richard Ellis (Texas politician), this article seems detailed enough to move it above a stub-class. Perhaps Start or even C class. Bigfreesample (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:33, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Parish Priest (book), this article looks to be stub-class as it has only one source and is not well-detailed in the text. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as stub class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Amoeba Music, this article looks detailed enough with good enough referencing to be considered for at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:31, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Outfit of the day. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:29, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, Start-Class. TeoTB (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of 2025 Australian federal budget, this article has been through some expansion since it was assigned start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Biamanga National Park, this article looks like it has enough sources and enough detail through its text to be upgraded to a start-class or higher rating. Qwerty123M (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:26, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Frankly (book). Qwerty123M (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:24, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Ra for Marie-Thérèse Fourneau, + thanks PaulasBunt (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done by User:Kj cheetham, who assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:22, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Burnaby Central in the 2025 Canadian federal election. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done by PKT, who assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of 2026 Newcastle City Council election. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Sinister Wisdom and considering a GA review if the reviewer has any opinions about that Hawksquill (talk) 01:58, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  ω Awaiting Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:15, 15 February 2026 (UTC)

   Not done I agree with its current rating as C-class. There are several statements without citations and whole sections without references like "Editors and publishers" and "Notable contributors". The tone of the article is also a bit off, as if the editor was involved in the publication. NeoGaze (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Tax Cuts Japan and Yukoku Alliance. Qwerty123M (talk) 21:56, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:19, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Request for reassessment of St. Augustine's University (North Carolina). Thanks in advance! Aumnamahashiva (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Aumnamahashiva (talk) 00:59, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

• Request for initial assessment of Trial and Conviction of Charles Flores. Thank you! Crs5827 (talk) 23:06, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C-class. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 05:35, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Crs5827 (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

• Initial assessment of Hersilie Rouy. Thank you, PaulasBunt (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:50, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Neiafu Tonga Temple. Thank you. Happyrain2121 (talk) 18:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C. GoldRomean (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Alice Duport-Percier Tonymetz 💬 18:58, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Dzungar Khanate, this should be as a B-Class article, as enough coverage had been added with a grammar and style, referencing and citaton, structure and supporting materials.— The Khan of the universe and the Hoofed animals. (talk) 12:15, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Anything further will need to be requested elsewhere. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:45, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of World War I in popular culture, it is currently assessed as start-class but should it be higher? Thanks! O2Q357Ys (talk) 14:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! O2Q357Ys (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Commonwealth Railways carbon steel carriage stock, this looks like stub-class as it does not have much content and only two references. Qwerty123M (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Stub class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 19:40, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Apple Creator Studio, content has changed with more references added since last review. Qwerty123M (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, stub to start. GoldRomean (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting a reassessment of Searows, which should now be a little higher than start-class. JulDer Wiki (talk) 16:07, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done; I think this meets WP:BCLASS. GoldRomean (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Am I Ever Gonna See Your Face Again, the article looks to be at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:58, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, as C. GoldRomean (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Josiah Pittman. Qwerty123M (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  Already done, by @Johnsoniensis. GoldRomean (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Barbershop quartet. I have personally made some changes and it looks decent enough for C-class. TyronesEditsPages (talk) 08:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done GoldRomean (talk) 19:32, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Corporate travel management, this article could probably do with more WikiProjects on its talk page, I was also considering nominating this article for deletion as it may not comply with WP:NOTDICT. Qwerty123M (talk) 01:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  Personally, I feel this skirts close to WP:NOTDICT at the moment, but it seems like it could be readily improved to avoid that. Pietrus1 (talk) 02:32, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, as start. Noting this is now at AfD. GoldRomean (talk) 14:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of William Henry Sleeman following a rewrite. Thanks. Joko2468 (talk) 14:10, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

   Done, good enough for B, I guess. I think the popular culture section should have references too, though. JustARandomSquid (talk) 12:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks! Was it just those citations that bothered you? Just trying to avoid a bloodbath at GA review. Joko2468 (talk) 20:34, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Revival Process, for B-class review. I posted this request previously but deleted it because I took up more revision of the article. That should be complete now.Pietrus1 (talk) 21:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you :). Pietrus1 (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Age determination in dinosaurs, which has been extensively edited since it was last assessed. Bloopityboop (talk) 01:06, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done as this is still a C class article. Consider improving the body, as the tables currently are longest portion of the article. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:06, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• I recently expanded The Second Coming (poem). It is currently rated Start-class. Could you please review it and let me know what I can improve? I'm a new editor and want to try to improve articles as much as I can. Thanks! Dess Dedalus (talk) 01:07, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as B class. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• Can I request a reassessment of Baracksdubs? I have expanded the article. It is currently rated Stub Class. Thank you! JesseL0vesT0ast (May the toast be with you.) (talk) 22:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. Consider increasing body length. Possibly a reception section and increase the media coverage section. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

  Sounds good! Thanks for looking at it homie! JesseL0vesT0ast (May the toast be with you.) (talk) 16:51, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• The Man Who Slipped on the Ice, please. Respair (talk) 00:26, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

  Already done by @SeoR, who assessed as C class, which I agree with. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Informal technical report, I think this is also not attributed to enough relevant WikiProjects but I don't have time to add enough as I am creating an article currently. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done as it is nominated for deletion and is unlikely to survive. Needs more proper sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 02:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of David Southwick, I think this article is detailed enough to warrant more than a stub-class rating. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:59, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done to C. Haven't taken a super close look but I reckon this could be B-class if you tried to expand/merge some of those one-sentence paragraphs (see also MOS:PARA and WP:PARAGRAPH). Certainly not a stub! :) GoldRomean (talk) 04:11, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Yorba Linda California Temple. Thank you. Happyrain2121 (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done to C-class as well. GoldRomean (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Bacolod Philippines Temple. Thank you. Happyrain2121 (talk) 00:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as C-class. GoldRomean (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Thuggee following a rewrite. Thanks. Joko2468 (talk) 04:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as B. Good luck with the GA review! JustARandomSquid (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Joko2468 (talk) 14:00, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Revival Process for the duplication tag specifically after attempting to remove duplication with the two articles. The Big Excursion was the part of the Revival Process that included mass expulsions and ethnic cleansing. It was too long to contain in only its own section of the "Revival Process" article and needed to be broken out some time ago. If there is duplication still be addressed, I would appreciate if you could write what still needs to be addressed on the talk page. Pietrus1 (talk) 18:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, but courtesy pings to @Ktkvtsh (who I see left comments back in 2024) and @Arved (original tagger) to see if there are any concerns. Also noting for the future that this page handles quality assessments, not reviews of tags—although the concept of tag "assessments" does bring up some interesting ideas :). GoldRomean (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  I don't have too much time to do a 100% check but from a quick read it looks good! Great work. Ktkvtsh (talk) 18:22, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thank you! Pietrus1 (talk) 18:27, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  It looks bit unfortunate that both articles contain a Main article The other article. Which one is now the "main article" :-)? Otherwise fine with me. Arved (talk) 14:11, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for pointing that out. Fixed.Pietrus1 (talk) 01:19, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

• hello i wanaa requst for another class rating for Radford Sechrist is rated as start and i do think is not the right class i do think is b class or c class ~2026-49132-7 (talk) 07:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  and if i was wrong iis ok. ~2026-49132-7 (talk) 07:43, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

  Already done as C-class, following some discussion (and socking) on talk page. GoldRomean (talk) 14:47, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

• I'd appreciate a second opinion regarding Penis as food - I don't want to move on from it if it really is start-class, it's a taboo article so I don't want to leave it in a bad state - that'd be juvenile of me. chickenpox4dinner (talk) 21:25, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  I am not a reviewer, but there was some weird formatting that might have been holding it back. It looks good to me personally to be at least C-class as it is. Pietrus1 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as C class. I believe this article still fails criteria two of the B-class criteria. Expand the sections that are present right now without compromising things like the organization or the citation density, and then submit for reassessment. Pietrus1 (talk) 23:47, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Beard Meats Food. It seems beyond what I would consider to be "Stub Class". JesseL0vesT0ast (May the toast be with you.) (talk) 19:24, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, to c-class. GoldRomean (talk) 23:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Revolutions of 1848 after a significant content expansion; it has been missing the requirement for references and citations, which I believe has now been addressed, although there is still work to be done. Pave Paws (talk) 06:10, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

  Already done as C-class. This is my first review, so I hope this makes sense. I will attempt to explain. The article is substantively quite good and it is well-organized, but B-class has one additional criteria and for B-Class, the article must meet all criteria: "The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as {{template

cite web}} is optional." Please unify the citation style (any style will do, but having separate "works cited" section and large "further reading" aside from the primary references is an issue) per the tag currently on the article and resubmit for assessment thereafter.

• Pietrus1 (talk) 23:38, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Cheyenne Mountain Complex after significant changes.Tokeamour (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done - We are unable to assess articles above B-class here. For featured Article assessment, see WP:FAC. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of Second Sydney Airport, there looks to be enough referenced content here for at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 11:22, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as Start-class, has C-class potential. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 22:57, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting reassessment of International Convention Centre Sydney, I think this article is worth at least start-class. Qwerty123M (talk) 02:27, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as Start-class. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

• Schaumburg Township District Library - Overall, I think it has enough info to be graduated from a Stub to a Start-class article. Would like a second opinion. azh 04:06, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

  Already done - I think Start‑class is appropriate, and I do not believe the article is far from meeting the C‑class criteria. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 18:59, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Requesting assessment of Anglo-French Convention of 1917. Also, if nominated, can this article be A class. 法爾納瓦茲 (talk) 00:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as B. A-class review is not done here; try WP:MHR. I suggest trying to incorporate more sources; the article currently heavily relies on just two. Nice work! GoldRomean (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

• Difficult (Eminem song) – new article; the NPP reviewer told me that they always assess articles as Start-class and leave it up to others to reassess them (see discussion). I believe the article warrants a higher assessment, so I'm making a request here. Cheers! TeoTB (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, not extremely long, but considering it's all referenced and concerns a song that was never even released, I'm giving B. JustARandomSquid (talk) 16:02, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

• Fernando Mendoza – The article is currently rated as a C class, but after significant expansion and the addition of an image, I believe it should be reassessed. Bulldawg (talk) 04:37, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as B, @BullDawg2021, but please do try and find a source for the sentence about his Catholic faith, the one marked with 'attribution needed'. JustARandomSquid (talk) 10:07, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

• Allbarone – I may continue to expand this more in the future, but I think it's at least a C as it is now. Fundgy (talk) 17:41, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, it's not a particularly notable topic, so B is ok. JustARandomSquid (talk) 10:04, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

• Secret Love (Dry Cleaning album) – Expanded to more than 4x its initial Start rating. The subject of the article was recently released and will see further expansion and an eventual GA nom, but in the meantime, I believe it's now at the level of a B. Fundgy (talk) 17:34, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done. I've given it B. JustARandomSquid (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

• James Baker-worked on this article a bit and wonder if it can be assessed any higher or if it still needs work Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 17:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done — I think there's just a few too many sentences and paragraphs without a source at the end. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:42, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for checking at least! Do you know if there were any sections you had in mind that needed those extra sources? Dizzycheekchewer (talk) 21:11, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• Lewis Hancox, please. Respair (talk) 03:30, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as B. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:40, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

  Cheers. ^^ Respair (talk) 23:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

• Birlestik-2024 - This article was listed as stub-class and had two sentences. I want to know what it can qualify as now. My biggest thanks in advance! Açaiboots (talk) 21:22, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

  Already done, as Start. I don't think it's far from C. Are there any suitable images at Commons? JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:37, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• I am requesting a quality assessment to move the Tent Presbyterian Church article from Start-Class to C-Class. I believe the article now reasonably covers the topic without obvious omissions and is suitable for general readership. Thank you. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 06:40, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, C. Some people might disagree, but I'm fine with giving higher grades for articles on niche topics even if they're a bit on the shorter side. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• Amsterdamned II - Attempting to work on this article for a while. TheDutchArchivist (talk) 15:40, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done, @TheDutchArchivist, as this is still start class. The empty box office section needs to be removed of filled in with appropriate info. The plot section can't be just one line. Also critical response needs to have relevant info and sources, not just a sentence saying it got mixed reviews.

  If you need some assistance with this, please leave a message on my talk page with the article hyperlink and I'll do what I can to help. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

• Family (1976 TV series) Have been working on this article for years; just did a comprehensive edit to address NPOV and other feedback - would love an assessment!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Martinized (talk • contribs) 02:00, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Characters and Storylines sections need sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

• Paris (1994 TV series) - Have been improving this article and would now like to get it assessed, please?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Idehill01 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done assessed as Start class. Also went ahead and fixed up the bare url sources. Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks for taking the time to do this, plus the fixes on the URL sources. Appreciated.

  Any suggestions on what I should work on to move this up to a 'c', please? Idehill01 (talk) 20:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

  @Idehill01 I've reassessed it as C. It's a relatively niche topic, so the article is more comprehensive than it's length would suggest. JustARandomSquid (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

  Great. Thanks. Idehill01 (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

• Sondre Lerche discography - Currently at Start class, feels comprehensive enough to be reassessed. Recently added new releases. Engineeringest (talk) 21:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done I have reassessed this as a list. Ktkvtsh (talk) 03:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

• Tent Presbyterian Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - Recently expanded from a stub to a full article with infobox images and citations. Requesting reassessment for Start or C-class. ThatOneTechNerd (talk) 07:51, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done as Start definitely not a stub anymore, very close to C. JustARandomSquid (talk) 12:15, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

• Mirusha Park has been expanded quite a lot, should it be higher than Start? User:GentiBehramaj— Preceding unsigned comment added by GentiBehramaj (talk • contribs) 21:11, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, assessing as C. JustARandomSquid (talk) 18:34, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Joe George Newly Created Article That I Expanded, Should No Longer Be a Stub EaglesFan37 (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed article as Start-class. NeoGaze (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Amit Soussana (hostage), Newly Created Article EaglesFan37 (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed article as C-class. NeoGaze (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• Rupna Chakma, It should not be a Stub-Class Article, I think its can be high. RatulH21 04:37, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done: Reassessed article as Start-class. I didn't raise it further because there are three sections wholly unreferenced. Please add citations there so the information can be veryfied. NeoGaze (talk) 13:54, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• The High Windows (album) - Just like another article on here, I have greatly expanded this article, so it might be good enough for start-class now. Thanks in advance! _{S.G. (They/Them) (Talk) (Edits)} 15:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done Probably could be C-class, I'd reckon, and assessed as such. Thank you for your work here :). GoldRomean (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

• Women's football in Bangladesh, I made a lot of changes in this article, I'm not sure if it's still a C-Class or improved to B-Class article. If it's a B-Class then I will try more to make it a GA. RatulH21 05:52, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

   Not done for now, there are still lots of unsourced text (I can add {{cn}} tags if you'd like) and short, one-sentence paragraphs (MOS:PARA). As a general tip, if you'd like to take this to WP:GAN eventually I suggest looking at similar example articles, like the GA Football in the Philippines. Appreciate the work you've done to the article! GoldRomean (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

  Add those unsourced tags. I will clear them before my exam starts. I still have more to do in this article RatulH21 (talk) 08:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

• 2024 Pittwater state by-election, I doubt this article is still eligible for stub-class, it must at least start. It has good detail and a few pictures. Qwerty123M (talk) 04:04, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, start. Bear in mind though that when looking at length people often tend to discard tables and lists and only look at prose. JustARandomSquid (talk) 11:52, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

• The High Windows - I have greatly expanded the article, though I'm unsure if it can be assessed as C or B, since it isn't really that long, but I'll wait. Thanks in advance! _{S.G. (They/Them) (Talk) (Edits)} 19:20, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

   Done, some people might disagree, but I think this is ok for B. JustARandomSquid (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2026 (UTC)