Wikipedia:Deletion review/Perennial requests

This is a list of perennial requests on deletion review. Please read this before requesting undeletion of any of these articles. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive—it is almost always best to wait unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.

This is an explanatory essay about the deletion policy.

This page provides additional information about concepts in the page(s) it supplements. This page is not one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community.

Shortcuts

Please be aware that requesting review of a frequently-reviewed case without an exhaustive and compelling case, or bringing substantial new evidence not seen in previous reviews, may be seen by some as tendentious.

Century Financial Consultancy

Promotional article about a company that has been repeatedly recreated. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 April 12#Century Financial LLC (closed).

Chris Chan

Article used in a harassment campaign, recreated under a dozen different titles and deleted and salted each time. See e.g. discussions from 2022 affirming this outcome at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2022 February 11, Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive335#Creating the "Chris Chan" article. Note that the current article with the title Chris Chan is about a different person.

Template:Support

Along with Template:Oppose, etc. Though these templates are widely used on other Wikimedia wikis, the consensus on the English Wikipedia, demonstrated over numerous discussions, is that they encourage voting rather than discussion aimed at the generation of consensus. Editors wishing to add the images to discussions can add the text importScript('User:Pythoncoder/Scripts/voteSymbols.js'); to their personal JavaScript page to provide the functionality of the templates. Any request for undeletion should provide new arguments, rather than simply asserting that prior consensuses were wrong, or it is likely to be closed speedily.

Priyanka Choudhary

AKA Priya Choudhary, Priyanka Chahar, Pari Choudhary. Actress and reality TV contestant where consensus is she has not met notability requirements. Article keeps being recreated at variations on her name. See AFDs (1, 2), DRVs (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), SPIs (1, 2, 3, 4).

Jack Massey Welsh

Jack Massey Welsh or JackSucksAtLife is not notable per WP:NBIO and WP:NYOUTUBE, his YouTube fan base of 5 million have been attempting to create a wiki page of him for the past five years, on other Wikipedias and the English one, for more information see this discussion on the English Wiki, and this one on the Simple Wiki. See also The source assessment on Jack.

Related Articles