Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film

Cholo Potol Tuli

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. No reviews found, whether English Or Bengali. Won't mind withdrawing if sources are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:24, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

This film actually based on popular Bengali theater that has been staged more than 250 times, based on a story by the famous Bengali writer Shibram Chakraborty. Pinakpani (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to List_of_Indian_Bengali_films_of_2020#October–December (WP:ATD-R; Wikipedia:IGNORINGATD) or Keep as the coverage could be enough to show this is notable--~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:13, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Fotema

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. Didn't find any bylined reviews in RS. Won't mind withdrawing if someone can find reviews. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom and I was not able to find reviews. If anyone can find 2 or more reviews on the film, please ping me. RangersRus (talk) 14:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to List_of_Indian_Bengali_films_of_2023#July_–_September (WP:ATD-R; Wikipedia:IGNORINGATD).--~2026-16195-13 (talk) 10:17, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Saturn Return (2026 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Future film lacking significant non-trivial coverage, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 20:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Could the article be moved back to draftspace with WP:DRAFTREASON? – The Grid (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:50, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Draftify until it releases. SenshiSun (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Draftify. No release date announced. No update about the film after September 2025. --SatnaamIN (talk) 22:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify per nom. WP:NFF must be enforced. Kelob2678 (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify. WP:TOOSOON. RangersRus (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

All content is accurate except Morse, Dickens and Yoon were in the cast all along. Jan is just when they were added to IMDB. ~2026-16521-08 (talk) 19:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

BehindWoods

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has a lot changed since the last AfD? Kailash29792 (talk) 15:57, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Film, Television, Entertainment, Companies, Internet, Websites, India, and Tamil Nadu. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Doorie (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to Sharmila Tagore#Films per WP:ATD-R.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Sharmila Tagore#Films. I am ok with this redirect as a strong Google book source was added to the page of the actress. RangersRus (talk) 15:02, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Chhip Suto Char

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. No reviews found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to List of Indian Bengali films of 2016#April–June per WP:ATD-R.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC) •Redirect to List of Indian Bengali films of 2016#April–June as best WP:ATD and WP:CHEAP. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 20:03, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:NFILM. Against redirect as the list is a very poor article that could be nominated for AFD as well with mostly dead and unreliable sources on it and of course nothing on the subject of this AFD. RangersRus (talk) 15:06, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Akash Choan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to List_of_Indian_Bengali_films_of_2016#January–March per WP:ATD-R.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Comment: I'm new to these type of discussions, so excuse me if I say something out of place. I have a basic question. Why is this page marked for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pushpaksen (talk • contribs) 23:10, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@Pushpaksen:, hello. I took the liberty to move your comment at the bottom of this page. To answer your question, the nominator thinks that there are no reviews of the film and that it therefore lacks notability. If you can find reviews or other sources with significant coverage (independent of the production) in any language, about the film, please add them here or on the page. Thanks. If you can't, some of the information can be added on List_of_Indian_Bengali_films_of_2016#January–March and the page could redirect there, if consensus is to redirect it.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 10:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete. Fails WP:NFILM. Against redirect as the list is a very poor article that could be nominated for AFD as well with mostly dead and unreliable sources on it and of course nothing on the subject of this AFD. RangersRus (talk) 15:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Mera Qasoor Kya Hai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to List of Hindi films of 1964. Per WP:ATD-R. Please @BhikhariInformer: do it boldly in similar cases, if you don't mind.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Dharmendra filmography where the film is listed with source making it appropriate ATD. RangersRus (talk) 15:34, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Ek Baar Chale Aao

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails in WP:NFILM. No SIGCOV or reviews found. Just PASSING mentions. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. BhikhariInformer (talk) 14:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to List of Hindi films of 1983. Per WP:ATD-R. Please @BhikhariInformer: do it boldly in similar cases, if you don't mind.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 16:44, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Break Up Story

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFILM. Found one TOI review, but that's not multiple. Won't mind withdrawing if more reviews are found. BhikhariInformer (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 07:26, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete Two items now used are from the same Telegraph news outlet, so not really helping notability. This talks about one of the actress' other roles, not really helping. I'd imagine there might be more in the local language, but I wouldn't know where to look for those. Happy to revisit if others can find better sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 13:09, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect to Mainak_Bhaumik#Web series (director), par WP:ATD-R. --~2026-14372-47 (talk) 14:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Delete. I have performed a BEFORE upto 15 pages in Google Search to find a second review, be it in Bengali language, but failed to found the second. Redirect is not a suitable option here over Delete, as Redirect doesn't save the article. --SatnaamIN (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
"Redirect doesn't save the article"? What do you mean? See WP:IGNORINGATD. ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

Unabom (upcoming film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upcoming film project lacking significant non-routine coverage per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 08:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify Production of the film hasn't received non-trivial coverage. We have an announcement that filming started, names of actors who participated in it, and a claim that it will be released in 2026. None of it is the independent coverage we need. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Draftify. Can't find any update on the film's status after June 2025. Better to draftify until any new development can be found. --SatnaamIN (talk) 23:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify there are a lot of fans of Ted K., and so there is a lot of WP:FANCRUFT sometimes for him. This might be notable later, not now. Iljhgtn (they/them · talk) 00:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep It's notable, it's filmed, well sourced and written and set for release this year as per Netflix's announcement in January. One user claiming "none of it is independent coverage" is wrong - the information comes from Netflix and reputable websites. To prevent people from

accessing this information is wrong and against common practice in the film space in my opinion. The thresholds for a film article to be in a mainspace have been reached. It doesn't need a lot of justification. It has been filmed, it has numerous articles covering it, it's a well written article, it has an established release. has name actors. That's enough. TheMovieGuy (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Established practice is codified in WP:NFF, according to that guideline, we should draftify. The movie will be distributed by Netflix, which means that information that comes from them is not independent. The information in reputable websites ultimately comes from the production team, which also makes it not independent. Kelob2678 (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Diler & Associados

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film production company without any WP:SIGCOV. The article on pt.wiki is not in better condition. Svartner (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:03, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Primo Filmes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film production company. The article is basically a catalog. Svartner (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Brazil. Svartner (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Companies. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Meshanthe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't see what makes this model notable for an article. Cited sources are extremely poor and can't find any. Mekomo (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Women, Film, Entertainment, Beauty pageants, and Singapore. Mekomo (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Vetri (TV series) as an WP:ATD. Not a notable pageant; didn't win the TV show. Kelob2678 (talk) 12:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Delete - Does not pass WP:GNG. Sources give no indication of notability. Retro music11 (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect as suggested, and as reasonable. Bearian (talk) 12:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Thavory Meas Bong

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a film, not properly referenced as having any strong claim to passing WP:NFILM. As always, films are not all automatically notable just because it's possible to verify that they exist, and have to show passage of certain specific notability criteria supported by WP:GNG-worthy reliable sourcing -- but existence is the only notability claim stated here, the article is so poorly written that it still to this day just says what decade the film was released in rather than what year, and is "referenced" entirely to a directory entry on an unreliable site and a Geocities (remember that?!?) fan page, with not a single GNG-worthy footnote ever having been added to the article at all.
Obviously I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody with proper access to Khmer-language sources can find the quality of coverage needed to salvage it, but nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to cite any GNG-calibre sourcing. Bearcat (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Cambodia. Bearcat (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

*Redirect to List of Cambodian films of 1969, per WP:ATD-R.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

But the film was apparently successfully distributed in a country that is evidently not a major film-producing country, was "preserved by the Bophana Audiovisual Research Center based in Phnom Penh, Cambodia" and screened in 2022 at the ACMI so Keep is possible per two/three criteria of NFILM (https://www.acmi.net.au/whats-on/thavary-meas-bong-bophana-center/). ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
That isn't an inclusion-clinching claim without reliable sources. It's the sourcing that determines whether a film gets an article on those grounds, not the statement. And no, it is not standard practice to redirect film titles to lists of films. Bearcat (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Yes. It. is. ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Precisely which of my correct statements are you, anonymous IP with five days of edit history, presuming to contradict me, longtime editor who's been around here for almost two decades and contributed significantly to the writing of our inclusion criteria for films in the first place (meaning I know exactly what they are and how they work, and can never be wrong in what I say about those things)? Bearcat (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
I had missed that impressively humble statement. I'll reply to your question, apologies for the delay. You informed me that you can never be wrong in what [you] say about those things (!) but -again I'm so sorry- I'm very much afraid that you are indeed wrong when you say that it is not standard practice to redirect film titles to lists of films; that is indeed an inaccurate statement, because redirecting film titles to lists of films (by country + by year/decade, for example) is completely standard practice on this Wikipedia, in particular for old non-English-language films, as is the case here. Ask around if you were not aware of that (a quick look at recently closed AfDs might suffice).(You also might want to read the essay WP:IGNORINGATD, but if you wrote that too, pardon me!) ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

And the fact that it was preserved and screened more than 5 years after release, is not a statement but a fact, that is sourced. ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Reliable sourcing, for the purposes of whether a film gets a Wikipedia article or not, means WP:GNG-worthy coverage about the film in media, not directory entries on the self-published websites of organizations that are not media outlets self-promoting their own organizational programming. (Even current films don't get articles on the basis of the self-published program catalogues of film festivals that screen them — they do or don't get articles on the basis of film critics publishing reviews of the films in the media.) Bearcat (talk) 01:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Was it or was it not screened at the ACMI in 2022? Is 2022 not 5 years after its release? This can be considered enough for a Keep per Wikipedia:NFO. If not, it is clearly enough for a redirect per Wikipedia:ATD-R, to a list of films, a totally standard practice on this Wikipedia. Side note: The official website of the ACMI is absolutely not what one calls "self-published" in English. ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 09:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This article has significantly changed since its AfD nomination. ~2026-14372-47 (talk) 23:43, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

•Changing to plain Keep in view of recent findings that indicate clearly significant critical attention and cultural importance in the context of the history of Cambodian cinema.--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 00:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep The article has been expanded and the film clearly passes WP:NFO because The film was given a commercial re-release, or screened in a festival, at least five years after initial release. Kelob2678 (talk) 19:30, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Walk the Blue Fields

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Upcoming film project lacking significant non-routine coverage per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 08:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify Principal photography began only a few weeks ago and hasn't yet acquired non-trivial significant coverage. Kelob2678 (talk) 18:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Draftify per above. If we had a page for the book I'd suggest redirecting there. If I get time today I may create one and include info about the film as an ATD, so it could redirect there. There's just not enough coverage of the production to show where it's notable in and of itself. If a worst case scenario happened and the production got abandoned completely today (rare but does happen) then it's not enough to pass NFF. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:52, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
I've compiled a few sources at the author's article, if anyone wants to do it before I get around to it. The book certainly looks like it's overdue for an article. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Keep It meets notability for inclusion in the main space. It is in production - it exists - and is well sourced, well written and features notable cast, crew and production company. That is more than enough justification for most any film article to exist. There is no clear, definitive reason why it shouldn't be in the main space. TheMovieGuy

The coverage here is extremely light and a lot of it is fairly routine and based on the same press release. What makes these fairly routine is that although the coverage may look in-depth, the bulk of it is routine cast/crew announcements paired with a couple of canned quotes. The bulk of it is often about other things the cast/crew have or are doing. This is kind of a big sign that the article is heavily based on a press release, as this is kind of par for the course with these and the goal is to promote the film by saying a bunch of "oh the people involved as so awesome, so the film will be awesome". However not in a way that's actual criticism/commentary, but instead is PR type prose.

Here's a rundown:

Deadline, dated 9/4/25: This announces that the film will get made. It announces that Blunt will star and produce. It's exactly the type of thing I mentioned above as far as content goes. Filming is not mentioned.
Independent, dated 3/2/26: This mentions that filming will take place, but it has not occurred yet. It's a bit better than some of the other typical announcements, which is typically another cast/crew PR article with a single sentence.
Deadline, dated 2/24/26: This is another cast/crew type announcement. Like the first one, it's just a cast/crew announcement. It doesn't include the quotes or go into quite as much flowery "this is what else they're doing" language, but it's essentially the same information. The big difference is that you have a couple of new names added. It doesn't really go into a huge amount of depth.
IFTN, dated 2/25/26: This is effectively the same as the Deadline sources, just slightly reworded. This uses the same quotes as the first article and the same cast/crew info. In other words, they either received the same press release or they combined the highlights of both Deadline sources to say the same thing in fewer words. There's nothing new here. It mentions production, however I've seen outlets use it to mean active filming as well as to reference pre-production.

What makes all of this routine is that it's super, super common for film companies to send out press releases to media outlets in order to hype the film. It's also common for them to trickle out cast/crew names, as the goal is to keep the film in the public eye. I've seen outlets publish "new" cast announcements stating that a person was joining a film, only for it to be the same info that was announced a few months prior. The only new info may be that there's a single change in cast/crew or an offhand mention (like 2-5 word mention) that principal photography has begun. With some of these, they may be using the same content as the earlier press release but change a couple of sentences here and there.

The issue here is that if something were to happen and production were to stop entirely right here and now, the coverage wouldn't be enough to establish that the production is notable. All we have are routine announcements of cast/crew, that are heavily based on a press release. A good example of what would be needed to establish notability per NFF would be Batgirl (film). that received a ton of coverage and while it may initially seem like they're heavily cast/crew announcements (and those are absolutely in the article), the coverage also contains journalist commentary on things like casting, location, costumes, and so on. Even then, the film is probably more notable for its cancellation.

Will this film release? Probably, but they also said that about Batgirl and it was shelved. There's a whole list of films that were cancelled during or after filming. Some do have articles, but there are also those that don't and likely don't merit their own article. Many of the ones that appear to have articles are actually covered in others, because the coverage just isn't enough to justify their own article. Many of those films were also considered to be sure things as well. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to Bengal Film Journalists' Association Awards#Hindi Section. (non-admin closure) UpTheOctave! • 8^va? 19:09, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Bengal Film Journalists' Association – Best Male Playback Singer (Hindi)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Bengal Film Journalists' Association Awards#Hindi Section, under WP:ATD-R. Half-baked list that fails in GNG as well as WP:NLIST. Half of the years have no information and the info which is present, can't be verified from secondary reliable sources since all the current sources on the page are PRIMARY. That violates WP:VRS and WP:V. My BEFORE didn't yield any independent, secondary sources having SIGCOV about list of winners for any particular year. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Music, Awards, India, and West Bengal. BhikhariInformer (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2026 (UTC)
Redirect to Bengal Film Journalists' Association Awards#Hindi Section. Agletarang (talk) 08:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Just delete it. What's the point of a redirect? Who is searching for "Bengal Film Journalists' Association – Best Male Playback Singer (Hindi)" on Wikipedia? Trumpetrep (talk) 17:10, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:19, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

•Redirect per nominator and Agletarang; WP:ATD-R--~2026-14372-47 (talk) 16:47, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Redirect to Bengal Film Journalists' Association Awards#Hindi Section – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 05:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Association of Film Commissioners International

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Bryce M (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Keep - the organisation's Cineposium has been reported on for over 40 years and currently no separate article. Sudiani (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bryce M (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:36, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:38, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Svartner (talk) 04:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Fargo (film)

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: keep

4/3

Closed discussion, see full discussion. Result was: 5/10 is moot, No consensus for 8/10, support for 4/3

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Film

Film

Cholo Potol Tuli

Fotema

Saturn Return (2026 film)

BehindWoods

Doorie (film)

Chhip Suto Char

Akash Choan

Mera Qasoor Kya Hai

Ek Baar Chale Aao

Break Up Story

Unabom (upcoming film)

Diler & Associados

Primo Filmes

Meshanthe

Thavory Meas Bong

Walk the Blue Fields

Bengal Film Journalists' Association – Best Male Playback Singer (Hindi)

Association of Film Commissioners International

Fargo (film)

4/3

Proposed deletions

Categories

Templates

Related Articles