Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Conscience/1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Conscience

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

The article was quite long, at over 14,000 words. This is 2,000 words longer than its GAN reviewed version, and longer than the 8,000 words that WP:AS and WP:TOOBIG recommend for spinning out. I think there are some sections that can be spun out and summarised more effectively here. There are also several sections that are quite long without a sub-heading: this makes navigation more difficult, especially on mobile. Z1720 (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Eh, I think this could be trimmed somewhat, but imo 8000 is way, way too short for such a broad topic. 8,000 is when it says you might want to split, 15,000 is when it becomes mandatory - between then it depends on the topic. If conscience isn't a broad topic few things are, so a word count that high is appropriate.. I would suggest trying to trim it back to the size it had at the GAN, which I think was fine. PARAKANYAA (talk) 18:50, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  • @PARAKANYAA: Featured articles such as Mind, Aesthetics, Ethics, and Philosophy are about 9,000 words or less. Knowledge, a good article, is under 9,000. I think there should be attempts to spin out information before this GAR determines that the article can justify its long length. I also see that some sections are quite long, and would benefit from trimming or adding headings to make it easier to navigate. Z1720 (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    Well, first, you'd have to suggest what should be spun out. I would argue that in all those cases there are much more obvious splits than here, so a longer article could be more appropriate. And adding more headings, sure, but that won't address length. PARAKANYAA (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
  • @PARAKANYAA: If a section is over four paragraphs, I usually recommend that it is considered for spinning out in articles that are quite long. This is because the spun out article will usually have a four paragraph lead, which can be used as the basis of what is placed in the parent article. I was going to list sections that might match that description, but it seems like every section of the article is very long and would benefit from additional sub-headings or spinning out. I also think "Notable examples of modern acts based on conscience" needs to be rewritten to move the examples to what it is describing, or removed. Z1720 (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    I think that varies greatly by section topic especially on broad articles. Most of the sections here don't seem to me to be notable topics on their own. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
    But yeah I am confused what the notable examples section is really trying to convey. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:55, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI