Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MainUnansweredInstructionsDiscussionToolsArchiveProject

This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation.

Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here.

Arts





Chapter Seven: The Lost Sister


I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get it to FA status someday, preferably in time for it to run on Stranger Things' 10th anniversary in July.

Thanks, Crystal Drawers 🍌 (wanna talk?) 17:01, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

























Everyday life

Engineering and technology

Rajat Khare


This article will very likely be nominated for deletion by paid editors on behalf of the subject. My hope is editorial feedback will produce an article more likely to survive AfD. I'd deeply appreciate your review.

Thank you, Brandon (talk) 18:45, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

General




Magdalena Egger


I've listed this article for peer review because... This is the first article I've created with a substantial amount of prose, and I want to make sure I'm on the right track as I work to create and improve more articles for skiers. I'd appreciate feedback on the clarity and flow of the writing, level of detail included, level of technical language, what to include in the lede, and organization/structure (which seems to be fairly standard for ski racer articles). Any other comments or suggestions would be welcome as well, as I feel like there is a lot that I don't know that I don't know about creating quality articles. Thanks, Wburrow (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)






Puerto Rico campaign


I've listed this article for peer edit because I recently added some information about the American preparations. Could someone with expertise review it for accuracy?

Also, I added a new image of American troops and would appreciate help with formatting it properly within the article. Thank you!


Jasmine Crockett


I've listed this article for peer review because this article has been expanded significantly recently but I feel that there's also a lot of promo and that there are better ways to ensure WP:NPOV, especially in regard to the tenure section. I feel like there's also a lot that feels WP:UNDUE and that there are also an overdue amount of quotations from her and about her rhetorical style.

Thanks, Wozal (talk) 19:28, 6 March 2026 (UTC)


Cheyenne Mountain Complex


I've listed this article for peer review because... I would like to eventually have it nominated as a featured article. As of now, the article might need more work. If someone could do a detailed check on the article that would help the editors with improving the article.

Thanks, Tokeamour (talk) 01:10, 8 March 2026 (UTC)


Yeah Yeah Yeahs (EP)


I've listed this article for peer review because I believe I have expanded it with all the readily available sources in a neutral way or stated facts, and want an opinion on if the article is currently in a state good enough to push for a good article review.

Thanks, Watagwaan (talk) 16:55, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Geography and places

History

Peer Review Request

This template should be substituted on the article's talk page.


Hi, I recently added information about the American preparations. Could someone with expertise review it for accuracy? I also added a new image of American troops and would appreciate help with formatting it properly.

Hectordej7544 (talk) 03:09, 6 March 2026 (UTC)


Johan Elverskog


I've listed this article for peer review because I created and want to make sure it meets a high standard.

Thanks!













Natural sciences and mathematics



Language and literature

Mochica language


I've listed this article for peer review because I wish to expand it content-wise and am looking for suggestions to improve it before I submit another GA nomination.

Thanks, 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 17:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Philosophy and religion

First Cathedral of Saint Paul (Minnesota)


I've listed this article for peer review because I an hoping to submit it as a Featured Article.

Thanks, ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 04:07, 15 March 2026 (UTC)


Dualism


I've listed this article for peer review to prepare it for a featured article candidacy. I would be interested to learn what changes are required to fulfill the featured article criteria, but I'm also open to more casual improvement ideas. Phlsph7 (talk) 10:27, 6 March 2026 (UTC)


Social sciences and society





Whole hog barbecue


I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for Featured Article soon. The article has already passed GA, but I want to make sure that the flow and formatting is good, and that it's easy to understand. I've tried to make sure that the sources and reference formatting is tight, so that part shouldn't need much (if any) work.

Thanks, AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC)










Lists

List of Singapore MRT stations


I've listed this article for peer review because... I want to nominate this list for FLC, and it is extremely massive, so any extra eyes are appreciated. In particular, I was wondering whether if I should include sections for station facilities (civil defence shelters and whatnot) and art. I think it would be a good use of WP:SUMMARY, but may detract from the main subject. As a courtesy, please read User:Icepinner/Annotated guide to List of Singapore MRT stations before asking questions here, as it contains questions that are easily answerable.

Thanks, Icepinner (Come to Hakurei Shrine!) 18:20, 14 March 2026 (UTC)




WikiProject peer-reviews

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI