Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Pornography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Pornography and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Discussion about WikiProject banner templates
For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:
- "This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale."
There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say "priority" instead of "importance". This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower Huddle • Handiwerk 19:48, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
Good article reassessment for Jayne Mansfield in popular culture
Jayne Mansfield in popular culture has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 05:01, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
Merge proposal at Talk:Pornography Act (Austria)
Article Pornography in Austria has been proposed for merging into Pornography Act (Austria). Your feedback is requested at this merge discussion. Mathglot (talk) 05:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
WP:ELOFFICIAL?
Is there some written guidance/essay/closed rfc/etc on having a WP:ELOFFICIAL in Pornography-related bios, like ? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Can you be more specific? There's no policy against it but the appropriateness would be on a case by case basis. Looking at the specific link, blogs with information would generally be preferred over image galleries. Drew McNish (talk) 10:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I looked at a few similar articles, and they lacked an ELOFFICIAL, so I wondered if there is some chapter and verse specifically against it for porn-actors. My basic view is that an ELOFFICIAL is good to have, if there is one.
- On the specific Savannah Bond article (which I noticed at User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Pornographic_hooks_at_DYK), the Instagram is practical since it has the blue checkmark, but there might be better options, I haven't really checked. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- No, all subjects are treated the same. I still prefer informational sources over galleries but in some cases they are justified. Instagram is fairly safe but once we include image galleries we'll have to include nsfw tags for some of them. Drew McNish (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't know we had those. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Not official tags but an note indicating it's nsfw. Drew McNish (talk) 15:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't know we had those. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 14:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- No, all subjects are treated the same. I still prefer informational sources over galleries but in some cases they are justified. Instagram is fairly safe but once we include image galleries we'll have to include nsfw tags for some of them. Drew McNish (talk) 12:23, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
WP:NOTCENSORED in Main Page
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Main Page#Visibility of adult industry.Guilherme Burn (talk) 13:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)