Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing Sockpuppet investigations and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This is not the page to report suspected sock puppetry. Please instead create a report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations. |
"Behavioural evidence needs evaluation"
I'm curious, who does these behavioral evidence evaluations? I'm assuming non-CU admins browse through the table and pick and choose ones they're interested in evaluating (which is understandable--this is a volunteer project after all and no one is "assigned" to do anything)... Is that how that generally works? I'm looking at the SPI case table right now, and cases such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nomian and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Arsi786 have been opened for nearly 3 months--do cases get closed without action after a set period of time if no admin evaluates the behavioral evidence of cases with the {{behav}} tag? Some1 (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2026 (UTC)