Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject Military history / Firearms International
Discussions:
Military history / Firearms
Discussions: Forces canadiennes / Canadian Armed Forces
Diskussionen: Militär / Waffen
Discussions: Histoire militaire / Armes
Discussions: Portal‐ノート:軍事 /
Discussioni: Guerra / Armi da fuoco
Discussions: بوابة:الحرب نقاش البوابة
Dyskusje: Militaria / Broń
∑ Interntl. 1 <--> ∑ Interntl. 2
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Firearms and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
This WikiProject has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Importance reassessment for Forgotten Weapons
I believe the article may fall under the criteria for 'Mid' level importance. Specifically the "Civilians notable for legal use of firearms." criterion. Opecuted (talk) 11:42, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed. I've reassessed it as such. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 02:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Standardised name for gun control/gun law/firearms regulation articles
There seems to be a lack of consistency when it comes to naming of gun control/gun law/firearms regulation articles for various countries. For example, we have:
- Gun law in the United States
- Firearms regulation in the United Kingdom
- Gun laws of Australia
- Gun control in Italy
I don't think there are any partcularly strong reasons for any of the names, and they seem to be randomly chosen. I think it would be good to standardise on a common name, which in my opinion should be "Gun control in X". Elshad (talk) 22:05, 17 December 2025 (UTC)
- The issue with using "Gun control" is that many regulations have nothing to do with "control". California's Prop 65 is a prime example -- it's an environmental/health regulation, that acts as a regulation on firearms and ammunition but is not specifically intended for gun control. "Gun laws in" or "Firearms regulation in" are both better terms, with the former being more WP:CONCISE and the latter being more WP:PRECISE as regulations are not necessarily laws (and in the US, many of the most noticeable ones are not, but are rather administrative regulations). I'd support either one, but prefer "Gun laws in" as being more accessible and concise. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 02:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Gun show loophole
Gun show loophole has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Feed ramp
Please add reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
- Added several. ⇒SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 02:29, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Spliting "Lists of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, 2009" by month
There is a discussion at Talk:List_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States,_2009#Split_by_month about spliting the list by month. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:38, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Port Arthur massacre (Australia)#Requested move 1 March 2026

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Port Arthur massacre (Australia)#Requested move 1 March 2026 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. TarnishedPathtalk 09:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)