Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Softball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Player pages
Hey, I'd like to bring out attention on creating more pages about current players in the softball community. As of now, I am in the works of creating a page for Janie Takeda because we know very little many players like Janie. Does anyone have suggestions for making a new softball player page or would be willing to look at some sources for my new page. Any kind of feedback would be greatly appreciated!--Frivera14 (talk) 22:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Templates
To create all the Florida softball pages, I created a college softball infobox (named Template:NCAASoftballSeason), schedule table start (Template:NCAASoftballScheduleStart), entry (Template:NCAASoftballScheduleEntry), and end (Template:NCAASoftballScheduleEnd) components. You can see a sample of what they all look like at 2009 Florida Gators softball team. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Ocdmuch (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Coordinators' working group
Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Article alerts
This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.
If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.
Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.
Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:41, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)
Are there enough articles on this subject to justify an Outline of softball?
Here's a discussion about subject development you might find interesting.
The Transhumanist 00:02, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
P.S.: See Wikipedia's collection of outlines at WP:OOK.
GAN backlog reduction - Sports and recreation
As you may know, we currently have 400 good article nominations, with a large number of them being in the sports and recreation section. As such, the waiting time for this is especially long, much longer than it should be. As a result of this, I am asking each sports-related WikiProject to review two or three of these nominations. If this is abided by, then the backlog should be cleared quite quickly. Some projects nominate a lot but don't review, or vice-versa, and following this should help to provide a balance and make the waiting time much smaller so that our articles can actually get reviewed! Wizardman 23:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
