1930 Turkish local elections

According to official statements regarding the election results, the SCF emerged victorious in 24 out of 502 electoral districts. The locations won by the SCF are recorded as 2 provinces (Samsun and Silifke), 16 districts, and 6 sub-districts: Bozdoğan, Nazilli, and Çine districts of Aydın, along with the sub-districts of Yenipazar, Atça, and Karapınar; the Keşan district of Edirne; the Central district of Silifke; the Bergama, Kuşadası, Menemen, Seferihisar, and Urla districts of İzmir, along with the sub-districts of Buca, Kınık, and Armutlu; the Gördes district of Manisa; the Central and Ladik districts of Samsun; the Merzifon district of Amasya; the Edremit and Susurluk districts of Balıkesir; and the Lüleburgaz and Vize districts of Kırklareli.^[9] In Istanbul, the CHF received a total of 35,942 votes, while the SCF received 12,868. The Vakit newspaper reported these figures as 35,934 for the CHF and 12,813 for the SCF. According to the same newspaper, the number of non-voting electors in Istanbul reached 250,746.^[10][11] In other cities:

• In Ayvalık, CHF received 1,143 and SCF received 1,044 votes;^[10]
• In İzmir, CHF received 14,624 and SCF received 9,600;
• In Bergama, CHF received 250 and SCF received 1,371;
• In Merzifon, CHF received 496 and SCF received 557;
• In Samsun, CHF received 416 and SCF received 3,312;
• In Lüleburgaz, CHF received 1,320 and SCF received 1,989.^[12]

The interest shown in a party with a brief lifespan of only three months clearly demonstrated the existence of a segment of the population dissatisfied with CHF policies.^[13] Immediately following the election, letters of grievance were received from various provinces, alleging that governors, district governors, and all state officials had adopted a stance in favor of the CHF, violating the principle of neutrality, and that the public had been coerced into voting for the CHF through pressure and violence.^[14] President Mustafa Kemal Atatürk expressed his reaction to these events to İsmet İnönü with the following words:

It is well. Be pleased. We have understood the situation. We see that you have not been able to satisfy the people.^[15]

SCF executives asserted that these election results did not reflect reality. In their view, the SCF had won the election, but the results were obtained through coercion and corruption. Fethi Bey submitted a motion during the session of the TBMM on November 6, 1930, regarding the alleged irregularities. Subsequently, taking the floor during the session on November 15, he enumerated the allegations of corruption and intimidation. After Fethi Bey, CHF deputies criticized him and SCF policies, alleging that it was actually the SCF that had engaged in electoral fraud; consequently, relations between the two parties became severely strained. Following the vote in the TBMM, the motion was rejected by 221 votes to 10.^[16] In light of these developments, Fethi Bey submitted his petition for the dissolution of the SCF to the Ministry of Interior on November 17, 1930.^[17] Sometime after the closure of the SCF, the Council of State annulled the municipal elections in the locations won by the SCF and appointed CHF mayors and council members to these positions.^[2]

This Turkey-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information.

• v
• t
• e