Wikiwand AI

2011 Nevada's 2nd congressional district special election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

On September 13, 2011, a special election was held in Nevada's 2nd congressional district to fill the vacancy[1] created by the resignation of Republican Dean Heller, who was appointed to the United States Senate.[2]

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
2011 Nevada's 2nd congressional district special election

← 2010
September 13, 2011
2012 →
 
Nominee Mark Amodei Kate Marshall
Party Republican Democratic
Popular vote 75,180 46,818
Percentage 57.92% 36.07%

County results
Amodei:      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%

Representative before election

Dean Heller
Republican

Elected Representative

Mark Amodei
Republican

Close

The race was called for Mark Amodei by the Associated Press just after 10 p.m. local time with 44% of precincts reporting and Amodei leading Marshall 57% to 37%.[3] Amodei easily won the election by a margin of 58% to 36%.

Rules

On May 2, 2011, Nevada Secretary of State Ross Miller announced the election, held under an untested 2003 law for replacing House members, would be open to any and all qualified candidates, without primary elections or nominations made by parties' central committees.[4]

The Republican Party filed suit challenging Miller's plan, preferring instead that each party be required to nominate a single candidate. The party's complaint stated that "A fundamental principle of Nevada's electoral statutes is that, in a partisan election, there shall be only one nominee from each political party."[5] On May 19, District Judge Todd Russell sided with the Republican Party and ruling that the major parties would hold conventions in order to each nominate a single candidate.[6] Miller asked the office of the Nevada Attorney General to appeal the case to the Supreme Court of Nevada,[7] which on May 31 issued an order instructing Miller and the state's political parties to address whether the election can be rescheduled due to concerns that the ongoing dispute over its rules may necessitate a delay.[8]

Democratic nomination

Nominee

Declared candidates

Declined to run

  • Jill Derby, former regent of the Nevada System of Higher Education and unsuccessful candidate for the 2nd district in 2006 and 2008[12]

Republican nomination

The central committee of the Nevada Republican Party voted to decide the Republican nominee in June 2011. Any Republican who receives at least two votes from members of the central committee can compete in the nomination process, which will be held under a two-round system.[13]

Nominee

Declared candidates

Declined to run

Independent American Party nomination

Declared candidates

Independent candidates

  • Earl Ammerman[10]
  • Roland Lee[10]
  • Helmuth Lehmann, businessman and author[10]
  • Christopher Simon[10]

General election

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin of
error
Mark
Amodei (R)
Kate
Marshall (D)
Timothy
Fasano (IAP)
Helmuth
Lehmann (I)
Undecided
Public Policy Polling[19] September 9–11, 2011 629 ± 3.9% 50% 37% 4% 4% 5%
Public Policy Polling[20] • August 18–21, 2011 600 ± 4.0% 43% 42% 3% 3% 8%
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Nevada's 2nd congressional district special election, 2011[21]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Mark Amodei 75,180 57.92
Democratic Kate Marshall 46,818 36.07
Independent Helmuth Lehmann 5,372 4.14
Independent American Timothy Fasano 2,421 1.87
Total votes 129,791 100.0
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, Mark Amodei Republican ...
County Mark Amodei
Republican
Kate Marshall
Democratic
Various candidates
Other parties
Margin Total
# % # % # % # %
Carson City 6,472 59.7% 3,824 35.3% 545 5.0% 2,648 24.4% 10,841
Churchill 3,002 68.5% 993 22.7% 387 8.8% 2,009 45.8% 4,382
Clark (part) 3,502 59.5% 2,181 37.1% 201 3.4% 1,321 22.4% 5,884
Douglas 7,866 67.0% 3,284 28.0% 582 5.0% 4,582 39.0% 11,732
Elko 3,369 72.9% 962 20.8% 293 6.3% 2,407 52.1% 4,624
Esmeralda 158 75.2% 30 14.3% 22 10.5% 128 60.9% 210
Eureka 272 73.7% 69 18.7% 28 7.6% 203 55.0% 369
Humboldt 1,471 65.8% 580 26.0% 184 8.3% 891 39.8% 2,235
Lander 597 74.0% 131 16.2% 79 9.8% 466 57.8% 807
Lincoln 503 77.0% 119 18.2% 31 4.7% 384 58.8% 653
Lyon 5,833 65.9% 2,413 27.3% 601 6.8% 3,420 38.6% 8,847
Mineral 514 52.4% 335 34.1% 132 13.5% 179 18.3% 981
Nye 2,746 61.7% 1,407 31.6% 300 6.8% 1,339 30.1% 4,453
Pershing 525 60.4% 217 25.0% 127 14.6% 308 35.4% 869
Storey 658 58.4% 360 31.9% 109 9.6% 298 26.5% 1,127
Washoe 36,797 52.3% 29,510 41.9% 4,082 5.8% 7,287 4.21% 70,389
White Pine 895 64.5% 403 29.0% 90 6.5% 492 35.5% 1,388
Totals74,97657.9%46,66936.1%7,7696.0%28,30721.8%129,414
Close

See also

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks