5-inch/54-caliber Mark 45 gun

Mod 0

Used mechanical fuze setter. Two-piece rifled construction, with replaceable liner.

Mod 1

Electronic fuze setter replaces the mechanical one. Made with a unitary construction barrel, which has a life span approximately twice that of the Mark 42 gun.

Mod 2

Export version of Mod 1, but now used in the U.S. Navy.

Mod 3

Mod 2 gun with a new control system. Never put into production.

Mod 4

Receives a longer 62-caliber barrel (versus Mod 1 and 2's 54 caliber) for more complete propellant combustion and higher velocity^[6] and thus more utility for land attack. Designed to use the Mark 171 Extended Range Guided Munition (ERGM), which was canceled. The Mk 45 mod 4 uses a modified flat-panel gun turret, designed to reduce its radar signature.

In sustained firing operations (Mode III), the gun is operated by a six-person crew: a gun captain, a panel operator, and four ammunition loaders, all located below decks. In fully automatic non-sustained firing operations (Mode IV), 20 rounds can be fired without any personnel inside the mount, using an autoloader.

In 2024–2025, U.S. Navy destroyers in the Red Sea increasingly employed the Mk 45 gun to defend themselves and merchants against one-way attack drones, launched by the Houthi rebels from Yemen during the Red Sea crisis.^[7]

Guided shell

In May 2014, the U.S. Navy issued a request for information (RFI) for a guided 5-inch (127 mm) projectile capable of being fired from Mark 45 guns aboard Navy destroyers and cruisers. This RFI followed the cancellation of the Raytheon Extended Range Guided Munition program approximately six years earlier. The proposed munition was required to achieve at least twice the range of conventional unguided shells and support missions including Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS)/land attack and enhanced anti-surface warfare (ASuW) against fast attack craft (FAC) and fast inshore attack craft (FIAC). A primary objective was to defeat swarming small-boat threats at extended ranges using a proximity fuse airburst fragmentation warhead capable of dispersing shrapnel over a wide area.

Submissions included the BAE Systems Multi Service–Standard Guided Projectile (MS-SGP), Raytheon Excalibur N5, and the OTO Melara Vulcano guided long-range projectile.^[9][10]

By 2015, Naval Sea Systems Command was investigating the feasibility of firing a version of the hyper-velocity projectile (HVP), originally developed for Navy electromagnetic railgun systems, from conventional 5-inch deck guns. Employing HVP from existing platforms was intended to enhance engagement capability against land, air, and missile threats while allowing additional time for railgun development. The HVP concept also offered a potentially lower-cost alternative to missile interceptors, which can cost hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars per engagement. As of 2015, adapting HVP for conventional guns was not a formal program of record.^[11]

When fired from conventional 5-inch guns, HVP rounds were expected to achieve velocities of approximately Mach 3—about half the velocity attained when fired from a railgun, but roughly twice that of standard naval gun projectiles.^[12] Although more expensive than unguided shells, HVPs were projected to be significantly less costly than missile interceptors, while providing engagement ranges against air and missile threats of approximately 10–30 nautical miles (12–35 mi; 19–56 km).^[13]

During the 2018 RIMPAC exercises, USS Dewey (DDG-105) fired 20 HVP rounds from a standard Mk 45 deck gun. At the time, unit cost estimates ranged from US$75,000 to $100,000 per round, compared to approximately $1–2 million per missile interceptor.^[14] These cost figures are frequently cited but represent circa-2019 estimates; accurate present-day costs would require adjustment for inflation using Department of Defense budget guidance issued annually through the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) process, with inflation assumptions provided by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in Circular A-11.^[15]

Within the electromagnetic railgun program, the HVP was later redesignated as the Gun-Launched Guided Projectile (GLGP).^[16] In 2022, the U.S. Department of the Navy terminated GLGP research and development.^[17][18]

In 2024, the Navy resumed developmental testing of the Hypervelocity Projectile, manufactured by BAE Systems USA.^[19] The HVP is a saboted projectile also being developed under a U.S. Army contract. While the Army variant uses a larger 155 mm sabot, the projectile body is common to both services; the Navy version employs a smaller 5-inch (127 mm) sabot compatible with Mk 45 guns.^[20]

Current operators

 Australia

• Royal Australian Navy
  • Anzac-class frigate: Mod 2, upgraded Mod 2 versions fitted with a Common Control System.^[21]
  • Hobart-class destroyer: Mod 4

 Denmark

• Royal Danish Navy
  • Absalon-class frigate: Mod 2

 Greece

• Hellenic Navy
  • Hydra-class frigate (MEKO 200 HN)

 Japan

• Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force
  • Mogami-class frigate: Mod 4
  • Atago-class destroyer: Mod 4
  • Maya-class destroyer: Mod 4
  • Akizuki-class destroyer: Mod 4
  • Asahi-class destroyer: Mod 4

 South Korea

• Republic of Korea Navy
  • Sejong the Great-class destroyer: Mod 4
  • Chungmugong Yi Sun-sin-class destroyer: Mod 4
  • Incheon-class frigate: Mod 4

 New Zealand

• Royal New Zealand Navy
  • Anzac-class frigate: Mod 2

 Spain

• Spanish Navy
  • Álvaro de Bazán-class frigate: Mod 2

 Taiwan

• Republic of China Navy
  • Kee Lung-class destroyer

 Thailand

• Royal Thai Navy
  • Naresuan-class frigate: Mod 2, upgraded to Mod 4

 Turkey

• Turkish Navy
  • Barbaros-class frigate (MEKO 200 TN II)
  • Yavuz-class frigate (MEKO 200 TN I)

 United States

• United States Navy
  • Active service ships:
    • Ticonderoga-class cruiser: Mod 2^[4]
      • CG-52-73: Mod 4 after receiving the cruiser modernization
    • Arleigh Burke-class destroyer:
      • DDG 51–80: Mod 2^[4]
      • DDG 81–112: Mod 4^[4]
  • Decommissioned:
    • California-class cruiser
    • Kidd-class destroyer
    • Spruance-class destroyer
    • Tarawa-class amphibious assault ship (later removed)
    • Virginia-class cruiser
    • USS Norton Sound (AVM-1) (testbed, later removed)

Future operators

 Australia

• Royal Australian Navy
  • Hunter-class frigate: 3 ships ordered of 6 planned^[22]

 United Kingdom

• Royal Navy
  • Type 26 frigate: 8 ships ordered (Mod 4)

 Turkey

• Turkish Navy
  • TF2000-class frigate: 8 ships planned

 Canada

• Royal Canadian Navy
  • River-class destroyer: 15 ships planned (Mod 4)^[23]

Cancelled deals

 India

• Indian Navy: The mod 4 variant was planned to be deployed on 7 Nilgiri-class frigate and 4 Visakhapatnam-class destroyer. The procurement of 13 guns was cleared by the Indian Ministry of Defence in April 2018. Of the guns, 11 would be deployed on the above-mentioned ships while 2 would be in the INS Dronacharya missile and gunnery school, and the INS Valsura electrical and weapons engineering school.^[24] The US Defense Security Cooperation Agency cleared under the Foreign Military Sales for the same deal in 2019. The deal would be worth over $1 billion.^[25] In 2021, India moved on to the development of an indigenous gun of similar calibre due to cost and logistics factor. Till the completion of the development, the 11 destroyers and frigates would be fitted with already operational OTO Melara 76 mm naval gun. The 13 gun deal for the Indian Navy did not go through.^[26]

Weapons of comparable role, performance and era

• Otobreda 127/54 Compact and Otobreda 127/64: contemporary 127 mm naval gun from Italian manufacturer Oto Melara
• 4.5 inch Mark 8 naval gun: contemporary standard naval gun for British ships
• AK-130: contemporary 130 mm twin standard naval gun mounting for Russian ships
• H/PJ-38 130mm naval gun : contemporary 130 mm standard naval gun mounting for Chinese ships
• French 100 mm naval gun: contemporary standard naval gun for French ships