Starting with the above given equations of motion for a medium at rest:

Let us now take
to all be small quantities.
In the case that we keep terms to first order, for the continuity equation, we have the
term going to 0. This similarly applies for the density perturbation times the time derivative of the velocity. Moreover, the spatial components of the material derivative go to 0. We thus have, upon rearranging the equilibrium density:

Next, given that our sound wave occurs in an ideal fluid, the motion is adiabatic, and then we can relate the small change in the pressure to the small change in the density by

Under this condition, we see that we now have

Defining the speed of sound of the system:

Everything becomes

In the case that the fluid is irrotational, that is
, we can then write
and thus write our equations of motion as

The second equation tells us that

And the use of this equation in the continuity equation tells us that

This simplifies to

Thus the velocity potential
obeys the wave equation in the limit of small disturbances. The boundary conditions required to solve for the potential come from the fact that the velocity of the fluid must be 0 normal to the fixed surfaces of the system.
Taking the time derivative of this wave equation and multiplying all sides by the unperturbed density, and then using the fact that
tells us that

Similarly, we saw that
. Thus we can multiply the above equation appropriately and see that

Thus, the velocity potential, pressure, and density all obey the wave equation. Moreover, we only need to solve one such equation to determine all other three. In particular, we have

Again, we can derive the small-disturbance limit for sound waves in a moving medium. Again, starting with

We can linearize these into

Given that we saw that

If we make the previous assumptions of the fluid being ideal and the velocity being irrotational, then we have

Under these assumptions, our linearized sound equations become
![{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial p'}{\partial t}}-\rho _{0}\nabla ^{2}\phi +{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla p'&=0\\-{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}(\nabla \phi )-(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla )[\nabla \phi ]+{\frac {1}{\rho _{0}}}\nabla p'&=0\end{aligned}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/aa2cce6070bbe2513e8131ddecfe208a22934c21)
Importantly, since
is a constant, we have
, and then the second equation tells us that
![{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\rho _{0}}}\nabla p'=\nabla \left[{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial t}}+(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla )\phi \right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/3086da69d78abf0844f0d20ce48e52a63041dd55)
Or just that
![{\displaystyle p'=\rho _{0}\left[{\frac {\partial \phi }{\partial t}}+(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla )\phi \right]}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/19c1d342c7b49520748399a614d0d0b9924cf2cf)
Now, when we use this relation with the fact that
, alongside cancelling and rearranging terms, we arrive at
![{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial ^{2}\phi }{\partial t^{2}}}-\nabla ^{2}\phi +{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}[(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla )\phi ]+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla \phi )+{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla [(\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla )\phi ]=0}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8bf0db6adecd2106d91d379b29d2524d4cd53723)
We can write this in a familiar form as
![{\displaystyle \left[{\frac {1}{c^{2}}}\left({\frac {\partial }{\partial t}}+\mathbf {u} \cdot \nabla \right)^{2}-\nabla ^{2}\right]\phi =0}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/a45ad2bd461f06c68efa2c35e7ecb3b43c4f1517)
This differential equation must be solved with the appropriate boundary conditions. Note that setting
returns us the wave equation. Regardless, upon solving this equation for a moving medium, we then have
