Bite force quotient

Bite force normalized for body mass From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Bite force quotient (BFQ) is a numerical value commonly used to represent the bite force of an animal adjusted for its body mass, while also taking factors like the allometry effects.

The BFQ is calculated as the regression of the quotient of an animal's bite force in newtons divided by its body mass in kilograms.[1] The BFQ was first applied by Wroe et al. (2005) in a paper comparing bite forces, body masses and prey size in a range of living and extinct mammalian carnivores, later expanded on by Christiansen & Wroe (2007).[2] Results showed that predators that take relatively large prey have large bite forces for their size, i.e., once adjusted for allometry. The authors predicted bite forces using beam theory, based on the directly proportional relationship between muscle cross-sectional area and the maximal force muscles can generate. Because body mass is proportional to volume while muscle force is proportional to area, the relationship between bite force and body mass is allometric. All else being equal, it would be expected to follow a 2/3 power rule. Consequently, small species would be expected to bite harder for their size than large species if a simple ratio of bite force to body mass is used, resulting in bias. Applying the BFQ normalizes the data allowing for fair comparison between species of different sizes in much the same way as an encephalization quotient normalizes data for brain size to body mass comparisons. It is a means for comparison, not an indicator of absolute bite force. In short, if an animal or species has a high BFQ this indicates that it bites hard for its size after controlling for allometry.

Hite et al.,[3] who include data from the widest range of living mammals of any bite force regression to date, produce from their regression the BFQ equation:

Or equivalently

where BF = Bite Force (N), and BM = Body Mass (g)

Carnivore BFQs

Sex Differences for BFQ in Canids

In a 2020 paper, the results of an estimation of the BFQ of various canid species separated by sex were published.[6] Below there is a table with the BFQ averaged from the BFQ for each espécimen of each sex and for each species. BFQ coming from a single specimen for each sex in a given species will be marked with an asterisk.

More information Common name, Scientific name ...
Common nameScientific nameMale BFQFemale BFQ
Short-eared dogAtelocynus microtis120.25144.65
Senegalese wolfCanis lupaster anthus140.66126.24
*Golden jackal*Canis aureus*113.98*113.25
CoyoteCanis latrans132.65131.88
Grey wolfCanis lupus130.59141.06
DingoCanis lupus dingo 133.67127.57
New Guinea singing dogCanis lupus hallstromi130.26107.31
*Red wolf*Canis rufus*182.41*124.33
Ethiopian wolfCanis simensis144.27158.21
Crab-eating foxCerdocyon thous118.24116.41
Maned wolfChrysocyon brachyurus131.59112.87
DholeCuon alpinus148.80147.85
Side-striped jackalLupullela adusta111.21107.21
Black-backed jackalLupullela mesomelas126.95115.11
CulpeoLycalopex culpaeus128.62120.07
*Darwin's fox*Lycalopex fulvipes*154.63*140.60
South American gray foxLycalopex griseus135.27124.87
Pampas foxLycalopex gymnocercus127.1116.76
Sechuran foxLycalopex sechurae128.84138.14
Hoary foxLycalopex vetulus123.09122.13
African wild dogLycaon pictus144.71146.08
Common raccoon dogNyctereutes procyonoides136.49134.94
Bat-eared foxOtocyon megalotis107.14126.26
Bush dogSpeothos venaticus160.28154.63
Gray foxUrocyon cinereoargenteus146.30121.51
Island foxUrocyon littoralis109.27108.22
Bengal foxVulpes bengalensis128.47139.10
Cape foxVulpes chama96.9887.21
Arctic foxVulpes lagopus120.59115.34
Kit foxVulpes macrotis109.77110.99
Pale foxVulpes pallida89.4798.21
Rüppell's foxVulpes ruepellii135.31121.97
Swift foxVulpes velox122.57120.38
Red foxVulpes vulpes116.25118.97
Fennec foxVulpes zerda113129.62
Close

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI