Apostasy in Christianity

Formal disaffiliation from the Christian religion From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apostasy in Christianity refers to the deliberate abandonment or renunciation of the Christian faith. The term derives from a Greek word denoting rebellion or defection, and in Christian usage, denotes a conscious rejection of Christ and his teachings, as distinct from a private lapse or passing doubt. The concept appears throughout the New Testament in various forms, especially in the warnings of the Epistle to the Hebrews, and became a major concern of the post-apostolic church as it confronted temptation, heresy, and persecution. Most Christian traditions have historically regarded apostasy as a real possibility for believers. Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Anabaptist, Lutheran, Arminian, and related Protestant traditions have generally affirmed that a genuinely regenerate believer can finally fall away, while Calvinism has notably rejected this possibility. Apostasy has sometimes resulted in ecclesiastical sanctions, and in contemporary usages the term may also refer to formal disaffiliation.

Definition and contributing factors

Apostasy in Christianity is the abandonment or renunciation of Christianity by someone who was formerly a Christian.[1] The term apostasy comes from the Greek noun apostasia ("ἀποστασία"), formed from apo- ("away from") and stasis ("standing" or "position"), literally denoting a "standing away", "stepping away from", "rebellion", "state of apostasy", "abandonment", or "defection".[2] It has been described as a willful falling away from, or rebellion against, Christianity, and the rejection of Christ by one who was once a Christian.[3][4] It is a theological category describing those who have voluntarily and consciously abandoned their faith in the God of the covenant, who manifests himself most completely in Jesus Christ.[5] It is also defined as the antonym of conversion, representing deconversion.[6]

B. J. Oropeza, who has written one of the most exhaustive studies on the phenomenon of apostasy in the New Testament (3 Volumes, 793 pages),[7][8][9] uncovered several factors that can lead to apostasy.[1] Some of these factors overlap, and some Christian communities were susceptible to more than one of them.[1] The first major factor in a believer committing apostasy (that is, becoming an unbeliever) is unbelief.[1] Other factors potentially leading to apostasy include persecution, general suffering and hardship, false teachings and factions,[10] malaise,[11] indifference and negligence towards the things of God,[12] and engaging in sinful acts ("vice-doing") or assimilating to the ungodly attitudes and actions reflected in a non-Christian culture.[13]

Biblical perspectives

The Kiss of Judas, Giotto, 1304–1306. Judas's apostasy is debated among scholars.

The Greek noun apostasia (rebellion, abandonment, state of apostasy, defection) is found only twice in the New Testament (Acts 21:21 and 2 Thessalonians 2:3), though the broader concept spans across Scripture.[2][14][15] The related verb aphistēmi carries major theological weight in passages such as Luke 8:11–13, where Jesus compares seed on rocky ground to those who receive the word with joy but fall away in times of testing, and 1 Timothy 4:1, which warns that in later times some will fall away from the faith by following deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons.[16][17] Similarly, Hebrews 3:12–14 cautions believers against an evil, unbelieving heart that leads one to fall away from the living God, emphasizing mutual daily exhortation to prevent hardening through sin's deceitfulness.[18] In the Old Testament tradition reflected in Deuteronomy (13:6, 17:2–7), turning away from God to serve other deities was regarded as a covenant-breaking transgression subject to strict judicial purging, a principle recalled in Hebrews 10:28 regarding those who broke the law of Moses without mercy.[19]

In The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, Wolfgang Bauder notes that the First Epistle to Timothy describes falling away from the faith in terms of heretical beliefs, while the Gospel of Luke refers to apostasy resulting from eschatological temptation under persecution. The Epistle to the Hebrews defines apostasy as an unbelieving movement away from God that must be prevented. Thus, the verb aphistēmi connotes the serious situation of becoming separated from the living God after a previous turning towards him.[20][21] Bauder adds that terms meaning "to fall" or "fall off" are used figuratively in the New Testament to refer to the loss of salvation rather than a mere failure from which recovery can be made, representing a catastrophic fall and eternal ruin.[22]

The concept is further developed through the verb skandalizō (falling away from faith) and the noun skandalon (enticement to unbelief or cause of salvation's loss).[23][24][25] Jesus uses these terms in Gospel warnings against personal sin (Matthew 5:27–30), in describing seed sown on rocky ground that falls away during persecution (Matthew 13:20–21; Mark 4:16–17), and in proclaiming eschatological judgments against those who cause believers to stumble or practice lawlessness (Matthew 13:40–42, 18:6–9, 24:4–13; Mark 9:42–48; Luke 17:1–2).[26][27][28][29] Jesus also uses the term in Johannine farewell discourses to prepare disciples against falling away under world hatred (John 15:18–27, 16:1). In Paul's epistles, skandalon and skandalizō describe obstacles that destroy a weak brother's conscience or lead church members away from sound doctrine (Romans 14:13–20, 16:17–18; 1 Corinthians 8:9–13), while Johannine and apocalyptic writings use the terms to portray hatred, false prophetism, and idolatrous seduction leading to spiritual fall (1 John 2:9–11; Revelation 2:14).[30]

Heinz Giesen analyzes these Greek terms, observing that in the passive voice the verb often means falling away from faith under persecution or eschatological pressure, leading to ruin and the loss of salvation. In the active voice, it implies causing someone to reject faith, prompting solemn apostolic exhortations to eliminate any obstacle to persevering conviction and to avoid becoming a stumbling block to fellow believers.[31]

Paul Barnett notes that James warns his readers of the possibility of temptation leading to apostasy. While a person is not tempted by God to sin, they can be lured and enticed by their own desires to sin (James 1:13–15).[32] He adds that the letter refers to a path of belief and behavior from which one may be led astray or stray by personal decision, jeopardizing their personal salvation (James 5:19–20).[32] Barnett also mentions that the Second Epistle of Peter addresses apostasy expressed by immorality under the influence of false teachers who denied the master who bought them (2 Peter 2:1–3, 14–22).[32] Furthermore, regarding the Book of Revelation, Barnett observes that the churches of Asia faced persecution and pressure to apostatize from various quarters, alongside false teachings and satanic deceptions, requiring believers to conquer these spiritual obstacles.[33]

Apostasy in the Letter to the Hebrews

The Epistle to the Hebrews serves as the foundational New Testament document addressing the mechanics of religious defection.[6] Scholar Scot McKnight proposes that its five major warning sections (2:1–4; 3:7–4:13; 5:11–6:12; 10:19–39; 12:1–29) function as an integrated rhetorical structure containing four recurring elements: the community at risk, the specific transgression, the pastoral call to perseverance, and the ultimate divine judgment.[34][35] His analysis concludes that the author addresses authentically converted Christians who face the peril of willfully renouncing Christ and grieving the Holy Spirit, urging them to remain steadfast in the new covenant to avoid eternal perdition.[36] Complementing this structural view, B. J. Oropeza notes that the community in Hebrews was simultaneously endangered by external societal abuse and internal spiritual fatigue, which manifested as an unwillingness to receive pastoral exhortation.[37]

Imagery of apostasy in the Bible

The Adoration of the Golden Calf, Nicolas Poussin, 1633–1634.

Scriptural literature employs a variety of vivid metaphors to depict the intentional abandonment of faith, primarily grouping them around concepts of revolt, directional deviation, collapse, and marital infidelity.[38] In classical Greek usage and throughout the Septuagint, the term apostasia evokes the political sphere of a military coup or an insurrection against divine authority (Joshua 22:22; 2 Chronicles 29:19).[39] This rebellious posture is frequently portrayed in the Old Testament as a directional reorientation, where the human heart deviates from righteousness to pursue illicit deities, a concept captured by the Hebrew root swr, which illustrates stepping off the rightful path established by the covenant (Jeremiah 2:19; Ezekiel 3:20).[40] Within the New Testament, emphasis shifts toward the imagery of stumbling and catastrophic downward collapse, exemplified by Christ's parable of the house constructed on sand that shatters amidst tempestuous trials (Matthew 7:24–27), highlighting the spiritual peril of moral failure or causing fellow believers to stumble (Mark 9:42–49).[41][42] To underscore the emotional and covenantal gravity of such defection, prophetic writings heavily rely on the metaphor of adultery, framing idolatry as a spouse's heartbreaking betrayal of Yahweh for foreign gods (Jeremiah 2:1–3, 5:7; Ezekiel 16).[43] This marital betrayal is reinforced by further agrarian and animalistic illustrations across both testaments, ranging from stubborn oxen, wild vines, and indelible stains in the prophetic books (Jeremiah 2:19–28), to Gospel and epistolary depictions of crops withering in shallow soil, severed branches burned in the fire (John 15:6), and animals reverting to mire and vomit (2 Peter 2:20–22).[44]

Early Church views

Historical evaluations indicate that Christians in the post-apostolic era endured severe external coercion from both imperial authorities and hostile religious opponents, prompting early theologians to issue urgent exhortations for perseverance.[45][46][47] Scholarly categorization of patristic warnings reveals three primary threats to Christian endurance: the allure of former pagan vices, doctrinal deception from heretical teachers, and state-sponsored persecution under threat of death.[48] These intersecting dangers shaped early pastoral letters, which consistently demanded unwavering fidelity to Christian ethics and apostolic dogma.[49] The following accounts and teachings from various early Christian writers illustrate how the post-apostolic church addressed these threats.

Temptations: avoid vices and practice virtues

Portrayal of Clement of Rome, mosaic, 11th century, Saint Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv.

In his correspondence with the Corinthian church, Clement of Rome (c. 96) attributed internal schisms to envy and unchecked desires, warning that abandoning godly reverence for worldly lusts leads directly to spiritual death (1 Clement 1–3).[50] To avert divine condemnation, he exhorted the community to embrace humility, abandon wicked deeds, and earnestly strive to remain among the persevering elect (1 Clement 4–14, 21, 28, 35; cf. 47).[51][52] He condemned factionalism for subverting faith and causing widespread doubt, reminding agitators of Christ's warnings against scandalizing the faithful and urging them to submit to church unity (1 Clement 46, 57).[53][54]

Ignatius of Antioch (c. 107) echoed these concerns, cautioning that individuals who instigate division or follow schismatic leaders forfeit their inheritance in the kingdom of God, whereas those who repent and return to communion are restored to divine favor (Epistle to the Philadelphians 3, 8).[55][56]

The author of the Epistle of Barnabas (c. 100) instructed readers to actively guard their salvation by fleeing moral iniquity, warning that spiritual negligence allows the adversary to hurl believers out of true life into eternal death (Barnabas 2:1–2, 10; 4:1–2, 9–13).[57][58][59] Structuring his ethics around the "Two Ways," he contrasted the path of light, characterized by love and obedience, with the way of darkness, which entails idolatry, hypocrisy, and soul-destroying vices (Barnabas 18–21).[60][61][62] Similarly, the Didache (c. 100) outlines the way of life through adherence to divine commandments and love of neighbor, while condemning the way of death as a catalogue of heinous immoralities from which disciples must be delivered (Didache 1–6).[63][64][65][60]

Writing to the Philippians, Polycarp (2nd century) identified covetousness as a destructive vice that defiles believers with idolatry and subjects them to pagan judgment (Philippians 6, 11).[66] To secure eternal life and reign with Christ, he taught that Christians must actively bridle carnal lusts and walk worthy of their calling (Philippians 5).[67][68] An anonymous homily from the same period (c. 150) stressed that verbal confession alone is insufficient for salvation; believers must validate their faith through righteous conduct, warning that indulgence in worldly desires causes a fall from righteousness into everlasting punishment (2 Clement 4–8).[69][70]

Scholarly analysis notes that while patristic literature rigorously condemns vices, The Shepherd of Hermas provides a pastoral framework for restoration. Unlike the apparent finality found in Hebrews, Hermas affirms that lapsed believers may experience forgiveness if they repent prior to the eschaton, using the allegory of tower stones to illustrate how individuals can be rejected or restored based on their willingness to abandon sin.[71]

Irenaeus (c. 180) argued that Old Testament historical failures were recorded as perpetual warnings for the New Testament church. He cautioned that believers who despise Christ's authority to serve fleshly desires risk eternal exclusion from the kingdom, emphasizing that knowledge of God does not grant immunity from judgment if one reverts to wickedness (Against Heresies 4:27.2–4).[72][73]

Deceptions: watch out for false teachers and heresies

Icon of Justin Martyr by Theophanes the Cretan, 16th century.

Early theologians viewed doctrinal corruption as a satanic instrument designed to seduce believers into apostasy.[74] Ignatius repeatedly alerted congregations to heretical teachers who used Christ's name to mask toxic doctrines, warning that those who corrupt the faith by wicked teaching defile themselves and incur everlasting fire (Epistle to the Ephesians 6–9, 16–17; Magnesians 8, 11; Trallians 6–7, 9).[75][76][77] Reflecting Synoptic eschatology, the conclusion of the Didache predicts an end-time proliferation of false prophets who will transform love into hate and cause many to stumble into perdition, promising salvation only to those who endure (Didache 16).[78][74][79]

Tertullian contended that the emergence of heresies should neither surprise nor terrify Christians, as apostolic prophecies foretold their rise to test and filter the church (Prescription Against Heretics 1, 4).[80][81] He maintained that while doctrinal error weakens superficial believers, it fails against robust faith grounded in apostolic tradition (Prescription Against Heretics 2, 13, 37).[82] Comparing heretics to wolves who pervert Scripture, he observed that whereas physical persecution creates martyrs, doctrinal heresy produces only apostates, necessitating continual vigilance (Prescription Against Heretics 3, 4, 17, 38).[83]

In his Dialogue with Trypho (c. 160), Justin Martyr pointed to sectarian groups who consumed idol sacrifices as living proof of Christ's warnings regarding false prophets. He argued that the existence of movements like the Marcionites and Valentinians should reinforce orthodox steadfastness rather than cause doubt (Dialogue with Trypho 35).[84] Clement of Alexandria (c. 195) likewise urged believers not to revert to sensual living or heretical opinions, asserting that anyone who abandons ecclesiastical tradition for false doctrine ceases to be a man of God (The Stromata 7:16).[85]

Cyprian (c. 251) warned that when overt paganism fails, the adversary devises deceptive heresies under the Christian label to fracture church unity. He emphasized that preserving spiritual security requires strict adherence to Christ's commandments and a continual return to the gospel source (The Treatises of Cyprian 1:1–3).[86][87] Historical analyses indicate that early genealogies of heresy, such as those by Eusebius tracing errors from Simon Magus to Gnosticism, framed these movements as satanic traps designed to plunge souls into perdition, which justified the institutional use of excommunication to protect the orthodox community.[88][89]

Persecutions: perseverance and martyrdom

The Christian Martyrs' Last Prayer, Jean-Léon Gérôme, 1883.

Patristic records of imperial persecution reveal a spectrum of responses: while figures like Polycarp endured martyrdom without reviling Christ, others collapsed under torture, offered pagan sacrifices, or renounced their faith entirely.[90][91] To strengthen sufferers, Clement reminded congregations that brief temporal afflictions endured for righteousness yield the eternal fruit of resurrection (2 Clement 19).[92] Cyprian similarly exhorted imprisoned confessors to maintain humility and faithful endurance, warning that the crown of life is secured only by persevering to the end (The Epistles of Cyprian 5:2).[93][94]

Ignatius articulated a profound readiness for martyrdom, writing to the Romans that he preferred to be ground by wild beasts as pure wheat for Christ rather than attain worldly prestige (Epistle to the Romans 1–6).[95] Tertullian defended martyrdom as vital spiritual warfare against idolatry, asserting that choosing death over apostasy preserves the soul for immortality, whereas cowardly denial results in damnation (Scorpiace 4–5, 9–12).[96] Based on these extensive writings, historical theologians conclude that the early church universally recognized the necessity of ongoing obedience, affirming that even a baptized believer could fall away and perish through defection.[97][98][99]

View of Augustine of Hippo

The perspective of Augustine of Hippo (354–430) stands out among early church fathers,[100] as his theological determinism shaped his understanding of salvation.[101] Augustine agreed that those who had received baptismal regeneration could apostatize, but argued that this occurs because final salvation depends on the gift of perseverance, which is granted only to some of the elect among the regenerated.[102] He further maintained that believers cannot know with certainty whether they have received this gift.[103][104] Later theologians influenced by Augustinian soteriology, such as Aquinas and Luther, adopted the same view, maintaining that those without the gift of perseverance could lose the grace of baptismal regeneration and justification.[105]

Perspectives across Christian traditions

Orthodoxy

The Eastern Orthodox Church supports conditional security and the potential for defection through its traditional liturgical and theological resources.[106]

Catholicism

In Catholicism, apostasy constitutes the total repudiation of the Christian faith, incurring a latae sententiae excommunication.[107] Theologians like Thomas Aquinas concurred that justified believers require ongoing divine grace, without which they can fall into mortal sin and lose their salvation.[105][108]

Anabaptism

Within the Anabaptist tradition, bodies such as the Mennonite Church and the Missionary Church maintain that believers retain free moral agency and can consequently turn away from salvation.[109][110][111][112]

Lutheranism

Portrait of Martin Luther, Lucas Cranach the Elder, 1529.

Martin Luther affirmed that baptismal grace can be lost, warning that falling from grace subjects backsliders to divine wrath.[113][114][115] The Smalcald Articles of Lutheranism establish that justifying faith and the indwelling Holy Spirit cannot coexist with unrepented mortal sin, affirming that a genuinely regenerate believer can finally fall away, teaching that even regenerate saints who fall into manifest wickedness forfeit their state of grace.[116] In the Apology of the Augsburg Confession, Philip Melanchthon rejects the notion that faith is mere historical knowledge coexist with deliberate sin.[117] Melanchthon articulated that willingly indulging mortal sin without repentance inevitably drives out the Holy Spirit and destroys justifying faith.[118][119][120] Confessional Lutheranism affirms through the Formula of Concord that justifying faith is forfeited whenever individuals willfully turn away from God's commandments.[121][122][123]

Anglicanism

Anglicanism recognizes sin after baptism and the genuine possibility of departing from divine grace.[124][125]

Calvinism

Portrait of John Calvin, anonymous, 16th century.

Within Calvinist soteriology, spiritual regeneration wrought by the Holy Spirit is permanent and necessarily culminates in final salvation.[126] In Calvin's theology, divine predestination unconditionally elects some to eternal life while bypassing others, ensuring the truly elect cannot experience final perdition (Calvin's Institutes 3.21:5; cf. 3.2:15–40, 14.6–9, 18–20, 24.6f.).[127] Consequently, apostasy is not possible for true believers.[128] Although true believers may experience temporary moral lapses, divine grace ensures their eventual restoration.[127] Calvin posited that scriptural warnings against apostasy serve as providential means to cultivate vigilance in the elect, whereas those who ultimately fall away possess only a superficial faith.[127] Consequently, he interpreted the severe warnings in Hebrews (6:4–6; 10:26–29) as applying exclusively to reprobate church members who lacked genuine regeneration.[127] To address this phenomenon of apparent apostasy, he postulated that common grace might include effects that cannot be distinguished from effectual calling and subsequent irresistible grace. Thus, Calvin formulated the concept of a temporary grace (sometimes called "evanescent grace") that appears and works for only a while in the reprobate before fading away.[129][130][131][132][133] According to this concept, the Holy Spirit can create in some people effects which are indistinguishable from those of the irresistible grace of God,[134] also producing a visible "fruit" in their life.[135] The doctrine of temporary grace, accounting for only an apparent apostasy, was also upheld by later Calvinist theologians such as Theodore Beza, William Perkins,[136] John Owen,[137] A. W. Pink[138] and Loraine Boettner.[139] A common corollary is that within this perseverance of the saints framework, one's status as a true Christian is demonstrated only by perseverance to the end.[140] The Calvinist doctrine of unconditional perseverance was articulated in various Reformed confessions of faith such as the Canons of the Synod of Dort (1619) and the Westminster Confession of Faith (1646).[141]

Arminian traditions

Bailly, David (1620). Jacobus Arminius.

teaches that while believers are empowered by the Holy Spirit, ongoing faith is necessary, and regenerate individuals can fall back into sin and perish.[142] This perspective was developed by Jacobus Arminius (1560-1609).[143] After the death of Arminius, his followers wrote a Remonstrance (1610) closely based on his Declaration of Sentiments (1608), which expressed caution regarding the possibility of apostasy.[144] In particular, its fifth article expressed the necessity of further study on the possibility of apostasy.[145] Sometime between 1610 and the official proceeding of the Synod of Dort (1618), the Remonstrants became convinced that the Scriptures taught that a true believer was capable of falling away from faith and perishing eternally as an unbeliever.[146] Simon Episcopius (1583-1643) formalized their views in "The Opinion of the Remonstrants" (1618),[147][148] which was their official stand during the Synod of Dort.[149] They later expressed this same view in the Remonstrant Confession (1621).[150][151] Puritan John Goodwin (1594–1665) also presented the Arminian position in Redemption Redeemed (1651), defending conditional security.[152][153] Arminian theology heavily influenced subsequent Protestant traditions, leading to several distinct denominational families that affirm conditional security.

General Baptists

Early General Baptists, through figures like Thomas Helwys (1575–1616) and Thomas Grantham (1634–1692), explicitly taught conditional security.[154][155][156][157][158][159] Groups like the General Association of General Baptists and the National Association of Free Will Baptists continue to emphasize that regenerate individuals must watch and pray lest they make shipwreck of their faith.[160][161]

Methodism

John Wesley firmly rejected the doctrine of unconditional final perseverance.[162][163] This Arminian understanding of conditional preservation was later defended by Methodist thinkers such as Thomas O. Summers,[164] and William Burt Pope.[165][166] It continued to influence Wesleyan and Holiness traditions,[167] such as the United Methodist Church,[168][169] the Salvation Army,[170] the Church of God (Anderson, Indiana),[171] and the Church of the Nazarene[172].

Pentecostalism

Pentecostal denominations like the Assemblies of God maintain that believers remain free to depart from grace and lose their status in Christ.[173]

Quakerism

In the Quaker tradition, some churches affirm conditional security and the threat of apostasy, such as the Evangelical Friends Church – Eastern Region.[174]

Restorationist traditions

Within Restorationist traditions, including the Churches of Christ, recognized scholars affirm conditional security and the possibility of apostasy.[175][176][177]

Free grace theology

Originating in the 1980s, Free grace theology promotes an absolute form of eternal security, positing that an individual who has genuinely experienced regeneration can never forfeit eternal salvation, regardless of subsequent conduct or beliefs.[178][179][180]

Theological and historical consequences

Pastoral and hermeneutical implications

Theological commentators note that while apostasy is a clearly articulated biblical concept, confessional traditions interpret its practical implications through vastly different hermeneutical frameworks regarding divine sovereignty and human freedom.[181][182] Rather than utilizing warning passages as constant pastoral threats, scholars suggest they function best as moral imperatives that stimulate spiritual examination and deeper reliance on the Holy Spirit.[183] Furthermore, pastoral theologians emphasize that an individual's ongoing anxiety regarding their salvation is itself subjective evidence that they have not hardened their heart into apostasy.[184]

Canonical and temporal penalties in Catholicism

In ancient canon law, apostasy a fide, defined as the total repudiation of Christian faith, was distinguished theologically from heresy, but subjected to the same capital penalty of death by fire by decretist jurists.[185] The influential 13th-century theologian Hostiensis recognized three types of apostasy: conversion to another faith (punishable by property confiscation or death), breaking major commandments, and breaking religious vows (punishable by imprisonment and expulsion).[186]

A decretal by Boniface VIII classified apostates together with heretics regarding incurred penalties; though explicitly mentioning only apostate Jews, it was applied broadly by the Spanish Inquisition to persecute Marano Jews and Moriscos suspected of reverting to their former faiths after forced conversions.[187] Temporal penalties for Christian apostates have fallen into disuse in the modern era.[187]

Contemporary practice and demographics

Poland

In Poland there is no formal state-sanctioned legal way to withdraw from any religious organization with which a person is affiliated. Those who wish to undergo apostasy must rely on the internal procedures set by their particular religious organization.[188] As of 2020, the procedure for apostasy in the Catholic Church in Poland is governed by rules defined on 19 February 2016, replacing earlier 2008 rules by eliminating the necessity of committing apostasy in the presence of two witnesses.[189] Apostasy gained popularity during the October 2020 Polish protests, though the total numbers remained marginal compared to the percentage of believers acknowledged by the church.[190] There is no official nationwide statistic of apostasy maintained by the Catholic Church, though earlier church figures indicated about 1,050 committed apostasies between 2006 and 2009.[190] The procedure is criticized for not withdrawing the apostate from the church registry as a member; after completion, a notation is simply added to the baptismal book, carrying no civil legal effects and leaving the individual recognized as Catholic by the church canon.[191][192]

United States

Out of all Americans who identify as religiously unaffiliated, including atheists and agnostics, 41% were raised Protestant and 28% were raised Catholic according to the 2014 Pew Religious Landscape survey.[193]

See also

Notes and references

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI