De Bruijn–Newman constant
Mathematical constant
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The de Bruijn–Newman constant, denoted by and named after Nicolaas Govert de Bruijn and Charles Michael Newman, is a mathematical constant defined via the zeros of a certain function , where is a real parameter and is a complex variable. More precisely,
- ,
where is the super-exponentially decaying function
and is the unique real number with the property that has only real zeros if and only if .
The constant is closely connected to the Riemann hypothesis. Indeed, the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that .[1] Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao proved that , so the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to .[2] A simplified proof of the Rodgers–Tao result was later given by Alexander Dobner.[3]
History
De Bruijn showed in 1950 that has only real zeros if , and moreover, that if has only real zeros for some , also has only real zeros if is replaced by any larger value.[4] Newman proved in 1976 the existence of a constant for which the "if and only if" claim holds; and this then implies that is unique. Newman also conjectured that ,[5] which was proven forty years later, by Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao in 2018.
Heat-flow interpretation
The family may be viewed as a deformation of the Riemann xi function under a heat-type equation. At , the function is essentially the Riemann xi function, written as an even Fourier transform. Varying multiplies the Fourier-side kernel by . Differentiating under the integral sign gives
so that increasing evolves by the backward heat equation in the variable .[6][2]
In this interpretation, the de Bruijn–Newman constant is the transition time at which the deformation changes from having non-real zeros to having only real zeros. De Bruijn's theorem says that once all zeros have become real, they remain real for all later values of the heat-flow parameter. Thus measures the stability of the real-zero property under this deformation: the Riemann hypothesis is the assertion that the undeformed function already lies on the real-zero side of the transition, while Newman's conjecture asserts that it lies exactly at the boundary rather than safely inside it.[4][2]
Proofs of Newman's conjecture
Newman's conjecture is the assertion that . The proof of this lower bound by Brad Rodgers and Terence Tao proceeds by contradiction. Assuming , they analyze the motion of the zeros of under the backwards heat-flow deformation. Their analysis forces increasingly rigid control of the zeros in the range . In particular, they prove that it implies that the zeros of would have to be locally close to equally spaced. They then derive a contradiction with known results on the local distribution of zeros of the Riemann zeta function, such as estimates related to Montgomery's pair correlation work.[2]
A different proof was later given by Alexander Dobner. Dobner's method avoids the zero-dynamics and zeta-zero gap estimates used by Rodgers and Tao. In the case of the Riemann xi function, the argument shows that for every , the deformed function can be approximated by a Dirichlet series
whose zeros imply the existence of zeros of off the critical line, equivalently non-real zeros of the corresponding , where the relationship is given by
Dobner's proof also gives a generalized form of Newman's conjecture for -functions in the extended Selberg class.[7]
Upper bounds
De Bruijn's upper bound of was not improved until 2008, when Ki, Kim and Lee proved , making the inequality strict.[8]
In December 2018, the 15th Polymath project improved the bound to .[9][10][11] A manuscript of the Polymath work was submitted to arXiv in late April 2019,[12] and was published in the journal Research In the Mathematical Sciences in August 2019.[6]
This bound was further slightly improved in April 2020 by Platt and Trudgian to .[13]