Draft:Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India (RSSDI)[1] is a professional organization in India dedicated to the study, prevention, and management of diabetes. Established in 1972, it is one of the largest professional associations of diabetes specialists and researchers in Asia. The society brings together endocrinologists, physicians, researchers, and other healthcare professionals to advance scientific knowledge, promote awareness[2] [3] [4], and improve the quality of diabetes care across India.
Submission declined on 13 November 2025 by Lovelyfurball (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 24 October 2025 by Dan arndt (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by Dan arndt 4 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 23 October 2025 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for organizations and companies. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by DoubleGrazing 4 months ago.
| |
Comment: Needs more references from reliable, secondary sources. The sources must discuss the organization in depth. Lovelyfurball (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.