File:Orderphoenix.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Summary
| Description |
A promotional image of the Order of the Phoenix from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix |
|---|---|
| Source | |
| Article | |
| Portion used |
Entire wallpaper |
| Low resolution? |
Yes, while still allowing identification of characters |
| Purpose of use |
Illustrates the organization in question |
| Replaceable? |
No free alternative possible |
| Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Order of the Phoenix (fictional organisation)//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Orderphoenix.jpgtrue | |
Licensing
The copyright for it is most likely owned by the company who created the promotional item or the artist who produced the item in question; you must provide evidence of such ownership. Lack of such evidence is grounds for deletion.
It is believed that the use of some images of promotional material to illustrate:
- the person(s), product, event, or subject in question;
- where the image is unrepeatable, i.e. a free image could not be created to replace it;
- on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation;
qualifies as fair use under Copyright law of the United States. Any other usage of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Publicity photos.
Additionally, the copyright holder may have granted permission for use in works such as Wikipedia. However, if they have, this permission likely does not fall under a free license.

Please note that our policy usually considers fair use images of living people that merely show what they look like to be replaceable by free-licensed images and unsuitable for the project. If this is not the case for this image, a rationale must be provided proving that the image provides information beyond simple identification or showing that this image is difficult to replace by a free-licensed equivalent. Commercial third-party reusers of this image should consider whether their use is in violation of the subject's publicity rights.