File:Technoviking.jpg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Summary
| Description |
An acolyte offers transparent liquid to The Techno Viking |
|---|---|
| Source |
YouTube (4:01) |
| Article | |
| Portion used |
frame from YouTube video |
| Low resolution? |
yes |
| Purpose of use |
For identification purposes in conjunction with discussion of the topic of the article. |
| Replaceable? |
no |
| Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Techno Viking//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Technoviking.jpgtrue | |
Licensing
This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the studio which produced the film, and possibly also by any actors appearing in the screenshot. It is believed that the use of a limited number of low-resolution screenshots
- for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents
- on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,
This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image or the agency employing the person. It is believed that the use of this image may qualify as non-free use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.
Please remember that the non-free content criteria require that non-free images on Wikipedia must not "[be] used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." Use of historic images from press agencies must only be of a transformative nature, when the image itself is the subject of commentary rather than the event it depicts (which is the original market role, and is not allowed per policy).
If this tag does not accurately describe this image, please replace it with an appropriate one.
| This file was nominated at Wikipedia:Files for discussion on 2013 July 6. The result of the discussion was No consensus. |