Wikiwand AI

Trial of Lunatics Act 1883

Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Trial of Lunatics Act 1883 (46 & 47 Vict. c. 38) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, allowing the jury to return a verdict that the defendant was guilty, but insane at the time, and should be kept in custody as a "criminal lunatic".[1] This act was passed at the request of Queen Victoria, who, the target of frequent attacks by mentally ill individuals, demanded that the verdict be changed from "not guilty" so as to act as a deterrent to other lunatics; the phrasing of "guilty of the act or omission charged, but insane so as not to be responsible, according to law, for his actions" remained in use until the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964.[2]

Long titleAn Act to amend the Law respecting the Trial and Custody of Insane Persons charged with offences.
Territorial extent[b]
Royal assent25 August 1883
Quick facts Long title, Citation ...
Trial of Lunatics Act 1883[a]
Act of Parliament
coat of arms
Long titleAn Act to amend the Law respecting the Trial and Custody of Insane Persons charged with offences.
Citation46 & 47 Vict. c. 38
Territorial extent [b]
Dates
Royal assent25 August 1883
Commencement25 August 1883[c]
Other legislation
Amends
Amended by
Status: Amended
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended
Close

It was cited in 1991 in the case of R v Burgess regarding the automatism defence.[3]

The form of special verdict provided for by this act was commonly known as guilty but insane. This expression was not an accurate description of that verdict.[4]

Subsequent developments

Section 4 of the act was repealed by section 1(1) of, and group 5 of part I of schedule 1 to, the Statute Law (Repeals) Act 1989, which came into force on 16 November 1989.[5]

See also

Notes

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks