List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 344
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 344 of the United States Reports:
| Case name | Citation | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Brown v. Board of Education | 344 U.S. 1 | 1952 |
| CAB v. American Air Transport, Inc. | 344 U.S. 4 | 1952 |
| Arrowsmith v. Commissioner | 344 U.S. 6 | 1952 |
| Sanford v. Kepner | 344 U.S. 13 | 1952 |
| FPC v. Idaho Power Co. | 344 U.S. 17 | 1952 |
| Nathanson v. NLRB | 344 U.S. 25 | 1952 |
| United States v. L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc. | 344 U.S. 33 | 1952 |
| United States v. Beacon Brass Company | 344 U.S. 43 | 1952 |
| Johnson v. N.Y.N.H. & H.R. Co. | 344 U.S. 48 | 1952 |
| United States v. Henning | 344 U.S. 66 | 1952 |
| Baumet v. United States | 344 U.S. 82 | 1952 |
| Sweeney v. Woodall | 344 U.S. 86 | 1952 |
| Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral | 344 U.S. 94 | 1952 |
| Mandoli v. Acheson | 344 U.S. 133 | 1952 |
| Brown v. Board of Education | 344 U.S. 141 | 1952 |
| Dixon v. Duffy | 344 U.S. 143 | 1952 |
| United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc. | 344 U.S. 149 | 1952 |
| Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Wood | 344 U.S. 157 | 1952 |
| Alison v. United States | 344 U.S. 167 | 1952 |
| Bailess v. Paukune | 344 U.S. 171 | 1952 |
| United States v. Cardiff | 344 U.S. 174 | 1952 |
| Montgomery Building & Construction Trades Council v. Ledbetter | 344 U.S. 178 | 1952 |
| Wieman v. Updegraff | 344 U.S. 183 | 1952 |
| Schwartz v. Texas | 344 U.S. 199 | 1952 |
| FTC v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. | 344 U.S. 206 | 1952 |
| United States v. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corporation | 344 U.S. 218 | 1952 |
| F.W. Woolworth Co. v. Contemporary Arts, Inc. | 344 U.S. 228 | 1952 |
| Public Service Commission v. Wycoff Company | 344 U.S. 237 | 1952 |
| King v. United States | 344 U.S. 254 | 1952 |
| Steele v. Bulova Watch Co. | 344 U.S. 280 | 1952 |
| Federal courts have jurisdiction over an action initiated by an American company, against an American citizen infringing on that company's trademark rights, if the citizen's operations and their effects are not confined within the territorial limits of a foreign country. | ||
| City of New York v. N.Y.N.H. & H.R. Co. | 344 U.S. 293 | 1953 |
| American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States | 344 U.S. 298 | 1953 |
| Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. O'Rourke | 344 U.S. 334 | 1953 |
| NLRB v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. | 344 U.S. 344 | 1953 |
| Edelman v. California | 344 U.S. 357 | 1953 |
| S. Buffalo R. Co. v. Ahern | 344 U.S. 367 | 1953 |
| NLRB v. Dant | 344 U.S. 375 | 1953 |
| Section 9(h) of the National Labor Relations Act does not preclude issuance by the National Labor Relations Board of an unfair labor practice complaint under § 10(c) after the required non-Communist affidavits have been filed, even when they had not been filed when the union filed the charge with the Board under § 10(b). | ||
| De la Rama S.S. Co. v. United States | 344 U.S. 386 | 1953 |
| FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Service Co. | 344 U.S. 392 | 1953 |
| Stone v. N.Y.C. & St. L.R. Co. | 344 U.S. 407 | 1953 |
| Gordon v. United States | 344 U.S. 414 | 1953 |
| Brock v. North Carolina | 344 U.S. 424 | 1953 |
| To try a defendant a second time for the same offense after a first trial had been interrupted in the interests of justice does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | ||
| Brown v. Allen | 344 U.S. 443 | 1953 |
| United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi | 344 U.S. 561 | 1953 |
| City of Chicago v. Willett Company | 344 U.S. 574 | 1953 |
| Bode v. Barrett | 344 U.S. 583 | 1953 |
| Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding | 344 U.S. 590 | 1953 |
| Lutwak v. United States | 344 U.S. 604 | 1953 |
| When it is material to a case that a marriage was a sham and intended only to defraud, the ostensible spouses are competent to testify against each other. | ||
| Howard v. Commissioners of Sinking Fund | 344 U.S. 624 | 1953 |
| When the federal government acquires property within a state with that state's consent, the property remains a part of that state. | ||
| United States v. Lane Motor Company | 344 U.S. 630 | 1953 |
| A vehicle used solely for commuting to an illegal distillery is not used in violating the revenue laws within the meaning of § 3116 of the Internal Revenue Code, and it is not forfeitable under that statute. | ||