List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 547
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 547 of the United States Reports:
| Case name | Citation | Date decided |
|---|---|---|
| Texaco Inc. v. Dagher | 547 U.S. 1 | 2006 |
| The pricing decisions of a legitimate joint venture between oil companies to sell gasoline to service stations did not violate the Sherman Antitrust Act. | ||
| Scheidler v. National Organization for Women | 547 U.S. 9 | 2006 |
| The Hobbs Act does not apply to the use of violence to block access to abortion clinics, because physical violence unrelated to robbery or extortion falls outside the act's scope. | ||
| Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. | 547 U.S. 28 | 2006 |
| A product involved in a tying arrangement is not presumed to have market power for purposes of establishing an antitrust violation by the mere fact that it is patented. | ||
| Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Inst. Rights, Inc. | 547 U.S. 47 | 2006 |
| Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Dabit | 547 U.S. 71 | 2006 |
| The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 preempts state law securities holder class actions even though such claims cannot be brought under federal securities laws. | ||
| United States v. Grubbs | 547 U.S. 90 | 2006 |
| An anticipatory warrant is not defective under the Fourth Amendment when it fails to list the "triggering condition" necessary for its execution, because a warrant only needs to describe with particularity the place or person to be searched and the items to be seized. | ||
| Georgia v. Randolph | 547 U.S. 103 | 2006 |
| In the circumstances here at issue, a physically present co-occupant's stated refusal to permit entry prevails, rendering the warrantless search unreasonable and invalid as to him. | ||
| Arizona v. California | 547 U.S. 150 | 2006 |
| Gonzales v. Thomas | 547 U.S. 183 | 2006 |
| Salinas v. United States | 547 U.S. 188 | 2006 |
| For purposes of the sentencing guidelines, the definition of "controlled substance offense" requires possession with intent to manufacture, import, export, distribute, or dispense. | ||
| N. Ins. Co. v. Chatham Cnty. | 547 U.S. 189 | 2006 |
| A county that was not acting as an "arm of the state" did not have sovereign immunity from lawsuits authorized by federal law. | ||
| Day v. McDonough | 547 U.S. 198 | 2006 |
| A state's unintentional failure to object to the filing of a habeas corpus petition after the statute of limitations expired does not prevent a district court from dismissing the petition on its own initiative. | ||
| Jones v. Flowers | 547 U.S. 220 | 2006 |
| When the notice of a tax sale is returned unclaimed, the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process requires a state to take additional reasonable steps to contact the property owner before it can sell his property. | ||
| Hartman v. Moore | 547 U.S. 250 | 2006 |
| A plaintiff in a retaliatory-prosecution action against federal officials must plead and show the absence of probable cause for pressing the underlying criminal charges. | ||
| Ark. Dept. of Human Services v. Ahlborn | 547 U.S. 268 | 2006 |
| Under federal Medicaid law, a state cannot assert a lien on a benefit recipient's litigation settlement beyond the amount attributable to payment for past medical expenses. | ||
| Marshall v. Marshall | 547 U.S. 293 | 2006 |
| Holmes v. South Carolina | 547 U.S. 319 | 2006 |
| DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno | 547 U.S. 332 | 2006 |
| State taxpayers do not have Article III standing to challenge state tax or spending in federal court simply by virtue of their status as taxpayers. | ||
| Sereboff v. Mid Atl. Med. Serv. Inc. | 547 U.S. 356 | 2006 |
| An ERISA plan fiduciary may seek reimbursement for medical costs from the proceeds of the beneficiary's personal injury settlement. | ||
| S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental Protection | 547 U.S. 370 | 2006 |
| eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. | 547 U.S. 388 | 2006 |
| Brigham City v. Stuart | 547 U.S. 398 | 2006 |
| Garcetti v. Ceballos | 547 U.S. 410 | 2006 |
| Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp. | 547 U.S. 451 | 2006 |
| Zedner v. United States | 547 U.S. 489 | 2006 |
| Whitman v. Dept. of Transp. | 547 U.S. 512 | 2006 |
| Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. Williams | 547 U.S. 516 | 2006 |
| Question 1 dismissed as improvidently granted. Otherwise, grant, vacate, remand for further consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.. | ||
| House v. Bell | 547 U.S. 518 | 2006 |
| Hill v. McDonough | 547 U.S. 573 | 2006 |
| Hudson v. Michigan | 547 U.S. 586 | 2006 |
| Kircher v. Putnam Funds Tr. | 547 U.S. 633 | 2006 |
| A federal district court's decision to send a case back to state court because its removal to federal court was not required by the Security Litigation Uniform Standards Act cannot be reviewed under 28 U.S.C. 1447(d). | ||
| Howard Delivery Service, Inc. v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co. | 547 U.S. 651 | 2006 |
| A creditor cannot seek priority status in a bankruptcy case to recover unpaid premiums owed for legally-required workers' compensation insurance. | ||
| Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh | 547 U.S. 677 | 2006 |
| Rapanos v. United States | 547 U.S. 715 | 2006 |
| Davis v. Washington | 547 U.S. 813 | 2006 |
| Samson v. California | 547 U.S. 843 | 2006 |
| Youngblood v. West Virginia | 547 U.S. 867 | 2006 |
External links
English Wikisource has original text related to this article: