1998 Greater London Authority referendum
Referendum held in Greater London on 7 May 1998
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 1998 Greater London Authority referendum was held in Greater London on 7 May 1998. The referendum asked whether there was support for creating a Greater London Authority composed of a directly elected Mayor of London and a London Assembly to scrutinise the Mayor's actions. Voter turnout was low, at just 34.1%.[1] The referendum was held under the Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998 provisions. Polling day coincided with the 1998 London local elections.
7 May 1998
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Are you in favour of the Government's proposals for a Greater London Authority, made up of an elected mayor and a separately elected assembly? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Results by borough | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Baroness Hayman (Lords)
| Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998 | |
|---|---|
| Act of Parliament | |
.svg) | |
| Long title | An Act to make provision for the holding of a referendum on the establishment of a Greater London Authority and for expenditure in preparation for such an Authority; and to confer additional functions on the Local Government Commission for England in connection with the establishment of such an Authority. |
| Introduced by | John Prescott, Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (Commons) Baroness Hayman (Lords) |
| Territorial extent | England |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 23 February 1998 |
Status: Spent | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
| Text of the Greater London Authority Act 1998 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. | |
Background
Labour's 1997 general election manifesto, New Labour, New Life for Britain, mentioned establishing a directly elected mayor and authority.[2]
Following a referendum to confirm popular demand, there will be a new deal for London, with a strategic authority and a mayor, each directly elected.
— New Labour, New Life for Britain
This would be the first London-wide government since the abolition of the Greater London Council.[3]
The government published a green paper with the title New Leadership for London in July 1997.[4] This laid out the principles of the GLA: a strong mayor and a "strategic" assembly.[4]
The full proposals were confirmed in a March 1998 white paper entitled A Mayor and Assembly for London which set out the full details of the proposal.[4]
Referendum question
The referendum asked voters the following question:
Are you in favour of the government’s proposals for a Greater London Authority, made up of an elected mayor and a separately elected assembly?
— Form of ballot paper, Greater London Authority (Referendum) Act 1998, Schedule
Voters were permitted to select either a simple YES or NO answer.
Result
Overall result
| Greater London Authority referendum, 1998 Result | |||
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 1,230,739 | 72.01% | |
| No | 478,413 | 27.99% | |
| Valid votes | 1,709,172 | 98.49% | |
| Invalid or blank votes | 26,178 | 1.51% | |
| Total votes | 1,735,350 | 100.00% | |
| Registered voters and turnout | 5,016,064 | 34.60% | |
| Referendum results (excluding invalid votes) | |
|---|---|
| Yes 1,230,759 (72%) |
No 478,413 (28%) |
| ▲ 50% | |
Results by borough
| Local authority | Votes | Proportion of votes | Turnout* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agree | Disagree | Agree | Disagree | ||
| City of London | 977 | 574 | 63.0 | 37.0 | 30.6 |
| Barking and Dagenham | 20,534 | 7,406 | 73.5 | 26.5 | 24.9 |
| Barnet | 55,487 | 24,210 | 69.6 | 30.4 | 35.3 |
| Bexley | 36,527 | 21,195 | 63.3 | 36.7 | 34.7 |
| Brent | 47,309 | 13,050 | 78.4 | 21.6 | 35.6 |
| Bromley | 51,410 | 38,662 | 57.1 | 42.9 | 40.2 |
| Camden | 36,007 | 8,348 | 81.2 | 18.8 | 32.8 |
| Croydon | 53,863 | 29,368 | 64.7 | 35.3 | 37.2 |
| Ealing | 52,348 | 16,092 | 76.5 | 23.5 | 37.8 |
| Enfield | 44,297 | 21,639 | 67.2 | 32.8 | 32.8 |
| Greenwich | 36,756 | 12,356 | 74.8 | 25.2 | 32.4 |
| Hackney | 31,956 | 7,195 | 81.6 | 18.4 | 33.8 |
| Hammersmith and Fulham | 29,171 | 8,255 | 77.9 | 22.1 | 33.6 |
| Haringey | 36,296 | 7,038 | 83.8 | 16.2 | 29.9 |
| Harrow | 38,412 | 17,407 | 68.8 | 31.2 | 36.0 |
| Havering | 36,390 | 23,788 | 60.5 | 39.5 | 33.8 |
| Hillingdon | 38,518 | 22,523 | 63.1 | 36.9 | 34.4 |
| Hounslow | 36,957 | 12,554 | 74.6 | 25.4 | 31.9 |
| Islington | 32,826 | 7,428 | 81.6 | 18.5 | 34.2 |
| Kensington and Chelsea | 20,064 | 8,469 | 70.3 | 29.7 | 27.9 |
| Kingston upon Thames | 28,621 | 13,043 | 68.7 | 31.3 | 41.1 |
| Lambeth | 47,391 | 10,544 | 81.8 | 18.2 | 31.7 |
| Lewisham | 40,188 | 11,060 | 78.4 | 21.6 | 29.3 |
| Merton | 35,418 | 13,635 | 72.2 | 27.8 | 37.6 |
| Newham | 33,084 | 7,575 | 81.4 | 18.6 | 27.9 |
| Redbridge | 42,547 | 18,098 | 70.2 | 29.8 | 34.9 |
| Richmond upon Thames | 39,115 | 16,135 | 70.8 | 29.2 | 44.5 |
| Southwark | 42,196 | 10,089 | 80.7 | 19.3 | 32.7 |
| Sutton | 29,653 | 16,091 | 64.8 | 35.2 | 34.9 |
| Tower Hamlets | 32,630 | 9,467 | 77.5 | 22.5 | 34.2 |
| Waltham Forest | 38,344 | 14,090 | 73.1 | 26.9 | 33.6 |
| Wandsworth | 57,010 | 19,695 | 74.3 | 25.7 | 38.7 |
| Westminster | 28,413 | 11,334 | 71.5 | 28.5 | 31.8 |
| Totals | 1,230,759 | 478,413 | 72.01 | 27.99 | 34.1 |
The 'Yes' vote won in every London Borough, though support was generally larger in Inner London than in Outer London.[5] The lowest support figures were 60.5% in Havering and 57.1% in Bromley; the greatest were 83.8% in Haringey and 81.8% in Lambeth.[5] The income level of boroughs was an even greater factor affecting the outcome.[citation needed][5]
Aftermath
The government passed the Greater London Authority Act 1999, creating the Greater London Authority. The first elections for the Mayor of London and the London Assembly were held in May 2000.
The Conservatives criticised the referendum's low turnout, and suggested that it undermined the legitimacy of the referendum.[1] The Labour Party refuted this suggestion, by instead suggesting that many people had decided to not vote because they perceived the result as a foregone conclusion, and that there was significant enthusiasm for a "strong, independent, political voice that can speak up for Londoners".[1][6]
The establishment of directly elected mayors was suggested as possibly as constitutionally significant as Scottish devolution or Welsh devolution.[7]