This article was nominated for deletion on October 28, 2013. The result of the discussion was delete.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
this article contains rough translations.
Verify references (talk) 21:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
this article may require an Imam to balance
I am not an expert on Iranian Islamic law and therefor cannot accurately interpret the religious laws under which he is charged. There is certainly some evidence that he is guilty of some of the charges such as presenting fake qualifications, presenting himself as a medical doctor and earning illegitimate funds through his practice of alternative medicine. Available evidence points towards either mental illness which should be treated or as the Iranian government declares, charlatanism although his beliefs arn't necessarily uncommon folk-beliefs in Iran which still validates his status as a political prisoner persecuted for his religious beliefs.
Verify references (talk) 04:54, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
iranian culture
his practices seem fairly consistent with western alternative medicine and iranian culture. apparently a more accurate depiction is as a self-help guru rather than as a cult-leader.:261:footnotes[1]
its entirely possible that poor translation is the issue here. he used a number of key words in the english translations of his works that are associated with conspiracy theories. for example, searching for 'inorganic beings' brings up Whitley Strieber and Carlos Castaneda and a bunch of secret intelligence conspiracy books about aliens which would be sad if this is the reason they have accused him of treason and espionage.
Verify references (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
WP:MOSISLAM there is a specialised set of guidelines regarding topics related to islam.
Verify references (talk) 04:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) Inneruniverse (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC) ==Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammad Ali Taheri==
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mohammad Ali Taheri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Inneruniverse (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
The reasons are followed below:
1- The intellect is a very well-known cognitive researcher as well as being a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize for the research and work he has contributed to the world of science. which was highly suggested by Professor Peter Antes from the University Of Hannover from Germany, the official letter written by him has been attached on Mohammad Ali Taheri's page in which summons his achievements and his unjustified and illegal imprisonment[1].
2- He is the founder of two schools of "Faradarmani" and "Psymentology". References can be found on Mr.Mohammad Ali Taheri's Wikipedia page. [2][3]
3- Mohammad Ali Taheri has achieved numerous international scientific recognizations by highly reliable and trusted bodies over many years. Certified certificates and prizes have been awarded to him, please see sources as listed in references list[4].
4- There is an anti-Mohammad Ali Taheri movement that is attempting to destroy his reputation, contributions and achievements to the world of science. All the scientific and reliable sources that I have provided support Mr.Mohammad Ali Taheri's biography that I have placed on Wikipedia.
5- Thousands of his followers have been storm Twitting(#Taheri_Movement) in support of teachings as well as his unjustified imprisonment.[5]
Thank you!
^unsigned^
I am interested in your perspective. could you please cite sources that are not from the official sites of taheri or his followers or wikipedia? I have discussed Procedia in the article and thankyou for providing these extra references. procedia -social and behavioural sciences is a discredited publication that allowed people to publish their own papers without any review by an expert. https://web.archive.org/web/20110920103553/http://ilna.ir/newsText.aspx?id=185181 for example i have included this news article which seems to support the statement that there was interest in researching Faradarmani. the twitter reference you gave might be useful. do you have any specific twitter posts by notable people like iranian politicians, doctors or academics?
Verify references (talk) 21:51, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
I have located the document you mentioned, https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DxTSI4AWkAE7rW6.jpg. i assume it is fake as it is not signed, dated or otherwise contains any discussion of criteria for nobel nomination. it appears to be a copy of the wiki article, misattributed to Prof Dr. Dr. Peter Antes.(this is a legit title. germans use doctor doctor for academics with double doctorates) do you have any information about this document or an official source?
Verify references (talk) 22:49, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
In response to the above user's claims: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inneruniverse (talk • contribs) 15:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
I am interested in your perspective too actually. You have removed all the direct-links to English versions of the books written by Mohammad Ali Taheri, which clearly shows that this is a major attempt to character assassination, by removing such links. Moreover, You have added a misleading reference in relation to aone of his books known as "inorganic beings" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inorganic_Being .
Interestingly, I also found that a "reference" that has been used in the above page "Inorganic beings" is a duplicate to the one that you have used in Mohammad Ali Taheri's biography page, so it is highly possible that the very same page could have been produced by you (maybe a different username) in order to mislead the public, this is shows that you could be abusing your privilege of editing. This clearly shows that your only determination is to destroy such intellect's reputation by spreading misleading and wrong information.
I provided scientific sources in support of "Faradarmani" and "Psymentology" and their impact on wellness of various diseases. Here are the links: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042813013219
The scientific results of Faradarmani are outlined with evidence in the article. Please read!
I also provided a link that Reports on chronic pain relief of various illnesses via Faradarmani. Here is the link: https://www.aaic.net.au/Document/?D=20120209
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is the official journal of the Australian Society of Anaesthetists, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society and the New Zealand Society of Anaesthetists. The Journal is published by the Australian Society of Anaesthetists. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an educational journal for those associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine and pain medicine, and a means by which individuals may inform their colleagues of their research and experience. The Journal presents original articles of scientific clinical interest. There are six issues a year published in January, March, May, July, September and November. Scientific evidence is presented in the report!
A Study of the Short Term Effects of Faradarmani on the
Frequency and Severity of Asthma Attacks. International Journal of Social science and Humanity. Here is the journal's link: http://www.ijssh.org/papers/276-T00001.pdf
Scientific evidence outlined in the paper!
In response to your personal opinion and questioning whether or not the discussion on the official letter contains any noble reason that Mr.Taheri should be nominated as The Nobel Peace Prize candidate is a clear proof that your aim is to mislead the public and destroy his reputation.
You stated that: The letter is not dated!! Well, if you look on the right top of the page, it's written 14.01.2019. This again is another illustration that you do not even look into matters, but only to achieve your goal and that is to character assassinate Mr.Mohammad Ali Taheri.
You have referred to him as a political prisoner. However the following reliable sources state the otherwise (He is referred as a Cognitive researcher, Founder of a Spiritual group, Conscience Prisoner) . interestingly you have used the two of following references and yet that has not reflected on your mislead movement against Mr.Taheri. This is another proof that shows you are only focusing on character assassination of this intellect.
Here is a few additional links that can stop the public from being mislead:
Amnesty International is a London-based non-governmental organization focused on human rights. The organization says it has more than seven million members and supporters around the world.
Overall, for reasons outlined above and sole aim of misleading the public by providing wrong information and sources, I urgently request the Wikipedia to stop such users like yourself from abusing the platform for their sole aim of destruction.
Thank you!
Speedy deletion has beem declined by BB23 (see article edit history). All claims about medical treatments have to meet WP:MEDRS. Primary sources, self-published and questionable sources are not appropriate. JimRenge (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Mohammad Ali Taheri, the founder of the so-called “Interuniversalism” (Erfan-e Halgheh), has gained a significant following in Iran and among the diaspora, presenting himself as a spiritual healer and scientific innovator. However, a critical examination of his teachings, practices, and published materials reveals substantial issues that align more closely with pseudoscience than legitimate scientific inquiry.
Lack of Scientific Rigor and Peer Review
One of the most glaring issues with Taheri’s claims is the absence of credible peer-reviewed support for his theories. His writings have been primarily disseminated through self-published outlets or journals lacking academic standing and rigorous editorial oversight. This bypasses the foundational mechanism of academic science: peer review. Peer review is critical not only for quality control but also for ensuring that claims are evidence-based, reproducible, and logically coherent within existing scientific frameworks.
Instead, Taheri’s ideas—such as “Cosmic Consciousness,” “Faradarmani,” and “Psymentology”—are presented without empirical evidence, testable hypotheses, or falsifiability. These are hallmarks of pseudoscience, as defined by philosophers of science such as Karl Popper and Paul Thagard. The frequent use of metaphysical and vague terminology in place of operational definitions further impedes critical scrutiny or meaningful evaluation.
Misappropriation of Scientific Concepts
Taheri frequently misuses or reinterprets established scientific terms (e.g., quantum mechanics, consciousness, energy fields) without adhering to their accepted definitions or the methodologies of the disciplines from which they are drawn. This technique—often referred to as “scientific-sounding language”—is a common tactic in pseudoscientific movements. For instance, his references to “quantum healing” and “cosmic intelligence” evoke legitimate scientific fields but are presented in a manner that is conceptually incoherent or lacks empirical support.
Moreover, Taheri and his followers often frame rejection or skepticism from the scientific community as evidence of persecution or a failure of mainstream science to be “open-minded.” This victim narrative is also a known rhetorical strategy in cultic pseudoscience, allowing the movement to insulate itself from critique.
Cultic Dynamics and Exploitation
Beyond epistemic concerns, Taheri’s organization displays characteristics typical of a cult, including claims of exclusive access to truth, charismatic authority, and a tendency to pathologize dissent. His followers often elevate his statements to infallible status, and spiritual practices are promoted as cures for physical and psychological ailments—without clinical validation or ethical oversight. This is especially dangerous when it leads individuals to forgo evidence-based medical treatments in favor of unproven spiritual interventions.
Additionally, the movement has been financially sustained through donations and fees for courses and materials, raising concerns about the exploitation of vulnerable individuals seeking healing or spiritual purpose. The absence of transparent governance or external regulation exacerbates these concerns.
Scientific Consensus and Ethical Responsibility
Scientific progress depends not only on open-minded inquiry but also on skepticism, accountability, and replicability. Taheri’s approach subverts these values. To date, no reputable scientific organization or academic body has validated his claims or practices. His theories have not been published in established scientific journals indexed in databases such as Scopus or Web of Science. Moreover, his methods have not undergone randomized controlled trials or systematic reviews that are standard in the assessment of psychological and medical interventions.
In light of this, the burden of proof rests squarely on Taheri and his proponents. Until his claims are subjected to rigorous, independent testing and transparent peer review, they should be treated as pseudoscience at best—and potentially as dangerous misinformation at worst. 46.143.34.246 (talk) 06:23, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
