Talk:Angel Locsin/Archive 1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Angel Locsin. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Fair use rationale for Image:Iwaly2.jpg
Image:Iwaly2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Court Settlement
I added the court case settlement.--Florentino floro 07:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Angel.jpg
Image:Angel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Note
Please DO NOT make such biased statements or fanboyism about the actress. Wikipedia enforces a neutral point of view, and it's crapshoot if you say things like that here. And sign your posts using four tildes, like ~~~~. This is not a forum about about the actress; any such messages will be shot on sight... Blake Gripling 00:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Angel McDonalds.jpg
Image:Angel McDonalds.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Starmometer and Tagpuan
Those are blogs. They shouldn't be here. --Howard the Duck 04:09, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Major Clean-up
I've just noticed that this article needs major editing. It not only needs more sources for citations, but even simple grammar and usage rules aren't adhered to properly. Sang'gre Habagat (talk) 08:22, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, adding to the fact that fanboys are adding too much unnecessary information about her... Blake Gripling (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and there are several single-purpose accounts that are adding fancruft to this article, most of which come from Gerald Gonzalez. An abuse report might come in handy... Blake Gripling (talk) 07:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ms. Angel Locsin's WP needs revision, all information should be verifiable. Most written on the owner's WP needed citations or sources to support the subject. User:Graceconcepcionr,talk
13:57, 24 October 2010
Oh
I Had restored the deleted files of User:Blakegripling ph. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lancestop (talk • contribs) 08:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, no need for such unnecessary info about her - Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate source of information, and is NOT a fansite... Blake Gripling (talk) 09:19, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
First sexy pictorial
I added this first in her career:Video: Star Patrol: Angel Locsin's first sexy pictorial --Florentino floro (talk) 06:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Year Film Award/Critics Award
2008 FHM Philippines[15] FHM Philippines Sexiest Women (Rank #1)
Kindly remove this from her profile, as you all know she is not rank # 1 on FHM Philippines Sexiest Women. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Charmed 218 (talk • contribs) 13:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Locsin is the #3 in FHM 2008 Results.Consciously Unique (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
Superstar For All Season
I included the tag Superstar For All Season because her showbiz nickname is really it is. Consciously Unique (talk) 05:46, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- No need to add that tag. Such words are considered conflict of interest. Blake Gripling (talk) 09:42, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
External Links
- I Had successfully included this Angel Locsin at telebisyon.netZMaxim (talk) 04:40, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
- Telebisyon.net is a spam site. Its articles are plagiarized from tabloid articles. Starczamora (talk) 14:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Additional Image
{{editsemiprotected}} Pls put this Image:M2008_AngelLocsin.jpg as an additional image of Angel Locsin in her appearance at the Maxim Party 2008 at the Makati City. Thankyou!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ZMaxim (talk • contribs) 09:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Image
I had included an Flickr image in the article. It is from creative commons and under the review of Flickr. GoblinTech (talk) 08:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I think you have to change the license of the source photo because it still has that "All Rights Reserved" tag. I recommend changing it to "CC-BY-SA". The watermark also should be removed. Starczamora (talk) 16:49, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- I resized one of the images posted on this article as it appears larger which it shouldn't be. It results to distraction with the readers and visitors. --Fetch dickson (talk) 08:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
New Image
Angelica Colmenares.jpg was added with GNU as its license. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manila Boy21 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- Tagged for deletion, though, sorry... Blake Gripling (talk) 11:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Education
Did she really go to high school at a university? Rich Farmbrough, 10:26 24 October 2008 (UTC).
- I think it should be University of Santo Tomas High School. Will fix the article later but that also needs citation. --bluemask (talk) 14:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Check
Can you guys check Land Down Under for any content problems (date of release for example). Rich Farmbrough, 10:29 24 October 2008 (UTC).
Himala Remake
- Is the Himala remake gonna be a film or a TV series? Angel Locsin to do Himala remake --Witchy2006 (talk) 23:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Official Website
- is Angel Locsin's Official Website, we fans are curretnly working on it. Manila Boy21 (talk) 04:24, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- If it is an "official" website, why is it created by "fans"? Starczamora (talk) 03:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Angel's one and only official website is www.angellocsin.com.ph which is runned by her sister ella colmenares and administrators officially sanctioned by angel locsin herself. The multiply site which claim to be her official website is unrecognized and is just a fan site. Hope this is clear to avoid confusion. The link regarding her official website should be edited. Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ellacolmenares (talk • contribs) 08:48, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Please replace the link yourself. Thank you. --Eaglestorm (talk) 09:17, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, it's done.--Eaglestorm (talk) 12:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- http://AngelLocsinWebsite.Multiply.com is the Official Website of Angel Locsin at Multiply and It is more known than the official one. It was been first website of Angel Locsin that has been established by fans, then later on the official website was been established also. It doesnt need to be managed by the star or by the relative of the star or officially informed to the star herself about the website. It talks about its flesh on news, on photos and everything. Im Pretty sure that the multiply website of angel locsin is more visited by the fans than the other. It is more considered as official. First, the two are just both websites of one star and the important is to considered a website whom better. But I pretty sure than the multiply website is more dinstictive than the other one. Incomparable Ph (talk) 02:02, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Never mind, it's done.--Eaglestorm (talk) 12:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ugh, quit the squeeing, you sock! Ella already explained it, so no need for any unnecessary fansite additions. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- The word "official" would mean having official authority or sanction; "official permission"; authorized or issued authoritatively. Which of which is the website that is approved/permitted by Angel Locsin? How do we know who says the truth? ax (talk) 05:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. Official as in Angel herself approves and is either administrating or supervising the site. The Multiply site is apparently Greald's attempt to sneak in and mess up the article. Blake Gripling (talk) 05:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- The word "official" would mean having official authority or sanction; "official permission"; authorized or issued authoritatively. Which of which is the website that is approved/permitted by Angel Locsin? How do we know who says the truth? ax (talk) 05:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
