Talk:Augmented triangular prism/GA1

Quick fail check

• Not a long way from meeting any one of the good article criteria.
• No copyright violations: assessment returned 0% similarity.
• No cleanup banners.
• No edit warring; the page seems stable.
• No previous GA reviews.

Review

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The entire section on properties is not understandable to a broad audience. For example, what is two-fold pyramidal symmetry? This is not understandable to me, because the contextual link provided there is not understandable. The main equation (largest-appearing one) in that section is also not understandable to a broad audience (although I can understand it), but I am not sure how it can be made more understandable per WP:NOR. The bulleted list in the properties section was also missing periods, which I have WP:BOLDly fixed.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   I do not have access to the non-open access sources used in citing sources, and the only open access source returns 400 Bad Request and 502 Bad Gateway, so I cannot verify there is no synthesization.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This article needs some work with understandability. I am not providing a result of the review yet to give contributors time to respond to this review and improve the article. ozmoozmo@enwiki (talk:contribs) 23:11, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

   Thank you for the comments. Give me some time to complete the tasks. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

   @OzmoOzmo. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 10:52, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   Yes? ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 10:55, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   @OzmoOzmo. I have done some tasks you receive. Are there more? Dedhert.Jr (talk) 10:56, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   Alright, let me reread...

   The section is now understandable to me. Anyway, I will now proceed with reviewing the one open-access source, which no longer returns 400 and 502. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 10:57, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   The open-access source does not actually mention rigid transformations. I used Ctrl+F with various terms: "rigid", which returned no results, "four" and "do" which returned irrelevant results only, "do-nothing" and "do nothing" which returned nothing. 180 returned only the 180th page. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 11:09, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   You can see the group ${\displaystyle [2]}$, denoting the symmetry group ${\displaystyle C_{2v}}$, in Table 3, line 49. The "mention rigid transformations" is actually explain such a symmetry group is under WP:MTAU; see Cyclic symmetry in three dimensions for the article, or if you want to understand specifically about the symmetry (${\displaystyle E}$ is identity or itself or do-nothing, ${\displaystyle C_{2}}$ means you rotate 0 and 180 degrees around an axis, ${\displaystyle \sigma _{xy}}$ and ${\displaystyle \sigma _{yz}}$ are two perpendicular vertical planes act as mirrors), thereby there are four ways to do. Since Table 1: Finite Groups on Isometries in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {E} ^{3}}$ only list ${\displaystyle [n]=C_{nv}}$, you can substitute ${\displaystyle n=2}$. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 11:19, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

   Oh. I don't know if this is WP:OR then; it may meet WP:CALC or not from your explanation. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:03, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

   CONVEX POLYHEDRA WITH PARQUET FACES does not actually mention augmented triangular prisms or augmentation. ozmoozmo@enwiki$t.c 02:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

   Replying properties section. I have added some wikilinks regarding surface area and volume alongwith some explanation. Breaking down the step-by-step to obtain a formula. The symmetry group ${\displaystyle C_{2v}}$ is based on source , usually difficult for me to apply the interpretation to the solid, probably need someone to gloss it in an expert way. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 04:11, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

   @LucasBrown has copyedited it. I appreciate it. Dedhert.Jr (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2026 (UTC)