Talk:Bash Back
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | On 7 April 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from BASH BACK to Bash Back. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Notability
I strongly doubt this group is notable, and suggest this page is deleted. Are there reasons that it passes the wp:gng criteria? AndyGordon (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Seems to be the only trans-led direct action group in the UK, with their recent action making international news (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/smashed-windows-graffiti-and-intimidation-feminist-conference-venue-in-brighton-vandalised-by-trans-activists-watch/articleshow/124470679.cms). I also need to add their other actions, just haven't got round to it. autumn (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/proscribe-militant-trans-group-bash-back-ex-political-violence-tsar-l9t757tjn
- They're notable to be a target for possible state violence EnbyEditor (talk) 21:05, 26 July 2026 (UTC)
References
Monteil, Abby (6 January 2026). "Trans Hackers Target Free Speech Union Over Work With Transphobes and Racists". Them. GnocchiFan (talk) 00:05, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
Requested move 7 April 2026
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:44, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
BASH BACK → Bash Back – Sources generally do not report the name in all capitals (e.g. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/trans-activist-rarely-legal-attacks-j2hps6zp6 https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czxwv9njvlgo) Chessrat (talk, contributions) 02:42, 7 April 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Itcouldbepossible Talk 10:24, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- Support per WP:TITLETM as the standard English text formatting is the most common usage in sources independent of the owner of the trademark. -- DeFacto (talk). 08:27, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Support per above. 162 etc. (talk) 17:22, 7 April 2026 (UTC)
- Support: As described by nominator and MOS:ALLCAPS SchreiberBike | ⌨ 22:50, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject United Kingdom and WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies have been notified of this discussion. Itcouldbepossible Talk 10:24, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- @Itcouldbepossible Why did you relist this? The consensus appears to be pretty obvious, so the RM should have been closed as moved instead. 1isall (talk | contribs) 13:45, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- @1isall I am actually trying to understand the mechanism of relisting RMs, when they can be done and things associated with it. Thanks for letting me know my err. I am closing this, and moving the page. Itcouldbepossible Talk 14:39, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
“non-violent”
I removed this term from the lead, since it is contradicted in the first sentence of the article. It’s a claim by the organisation themselves who are hardly a reliable source in the circumstances. Springnuts (talk) 06:16, 28 August 2026 (UTC)