Talk:Beorn

Reviewer: GimliDotNet (talk · contribs) 12:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Beorn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I am going to do my first review of a GA nominated article. Feel free to ping me any advice on my talk page or in a new section below. It may take a few days for me to work my way through it as I go through the guidance and content of the article.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

The sentence

Beorn's human form is of such great size that the three and a half foot tall Bilbo judge that he could have easily walked between Beorn's legs without touching his body

Needs adjusting, the “judge” Is not right, it should be judges.

• Fixed.

1. b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

This article qualifies for GA status, it meets all the above criteria and then some. User:Chiswick Chap has taken a weak article, expanded it with relevant information. (Criteria marked are unassessed)