Talk:Bergans

This article does not make it clear whether this is both a brand and a company. It is also in general need of clean-up as the recently added maintenance banners strongly suggest. __meco (talk) 08:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for setting the maintance-banner. Bergans is a company and a brand. The products are manufactured in SE-Asia meanwhile. --Outdoor-Bro (talk) 12:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Bergans. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 394 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I have a conflict of interest as I am a paid subcontractor. I have prepared an updated version of the article in my sandbox:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zh25st/sandbox

The draft revises the lead and restructures the article, removes promotional/unsourced wording, and adds inline citations (including third-party sources where available) across the history, products, sustainability/corporate responsibility, and awards sections.

If the sandbox version is acceptable, please replace the current published article with the draft. If the maintenance issues have been addressed, please also remove the “multiple issues” template (added October 2017) and the stub tag.

Thank you. Zh25st (talk) 13:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

In your draft, you remove some of the content from the lead. Generally content is not removed without a reason. Can I ask why you removed the information? - Otherwise (Talk?) 01:22, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for reviewing and for your question. I edited the article overall and moved the product information to the products section to prevent duplication and to make the lead more of a summary-style overview.

I also removed the words "pioneered" and "widely adopted" because they sounded promotional, and I couldn't find independent secondary sources to support them.

Since the article was previously flagged for having a promotional tone, I chose more conservative wording. However, I am open to re-adding them if appropriate. Thanks. Zh25st (talk) 07:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

I have read the above message. I will reply when I have a moment. - Otherwise (Talk?) 18:35, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi, just checking in regarding the edit request above. I understand the backlog is significant and appreciate that reviews are done by volunteers. If any clarification or sourcing adjustments would help move this forward, I’m happy to assist. Thanks again. Zh25st (talk) 07:30, 27 February 2026 (UTC)