Talk:ChatGPT/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 23:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Crystalite13 (talk · contribs) 22:19, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Czarking0No doubt this article meets GA. Very good job, and congrats! Crystalite13 (talk) 18:29, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Prose
Very impressive prose! Not much I can comment on, well done!
Lead
![]()
Training
![]()
Features
![]()
Paid tier
![]()
Mobile apps
![]()
Infrastructure
![]()
Languages
![]()
GPT Store
![]()
Deep Research
![]()
Images
![]()
Agents
![]()
ChatGPT Health
![]()
Limitations
![]()
Hallucination
![]()
Jailbreaking
![]()
Context Window
![]()
Security
![]()
Watermarking
![]()
Age restrictions
![]()
Model Versions
![]()
GPT-4
![]()
GPT-4o
![]()
o1
![]()
GPT-4.5
![]()
GPT-5
![]()
Reception
![]()
In art
![]()
In politics
![]()
Regional responses
![]()
American tech personas
![]()
Copyright
![]()
Applications
![]()
Academic research
![]()
Computer science
![]()
Computer security
![]()
Education
![]()
Culture
![]()
Financial markets
![]()
Medicine
![]()
Mental health
![]()
Law
![]()
Stable
Gonna be honest, I was actually pretty surprised that editing history seems pretty constructive. It was protected for vandalism, after all.
Neutral
This part was very good, no problems here!
Sources
Copyvio
Earwig's Copyvio came out fine, just some flags for quotes, all good!
Spotcheck
- Ref 162:

- Ref 264:

- Ref 258:

- Ref 92:

- Ref 80:

Media
Liked the media usage with the different prompts and examples about hallucination, tagged correctly, good here!