Wikiwand AI

Talk:Courtaud/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: TouchedWithFire (talk · contribs) 07:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Edward056686 (talk · contribs) 21:17, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

I will review this. Edward056686 (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

  • The lede is fairly short and doesn't include all of the main points covered in the article.
  • It seems that "Background" and "Interpretation" cover similar ground, they both provide context for the frequency of wolf attacks in France. Combining these into one section would improve the article.
  • The anonymous Journal d'un bourgeois de Paris sous Charles VI et Charles VII describes various events of the first half of the 15th century. It seems strange that the first sentence of the "Background" section is describing this book. Is this journal the only source for Cortaud?
  • The "Cortaud" section should be renamed "History" or "Life".
  • The main section about Cortaud's attacks is quite short, is there nothing more that can be added here?
  • According to the Journal, the most infamous was one "terrible and horrible wolf". "The most infamous one" probably refers to the wolves attacking the area, but since this is the first sentence of the section, it should do a better job of introducing the subject.
  • Authors Michael Wallace and Lance Roddick wrote novels with a name identical to that of Mannix, and used Courtaud's story as a setting could be "Authors Michael Wallace and Lance Roddick wrote novels about Cortaud, both also titled The Wolves of Paris."
  • The divergence of the Parisian wolves from their ordinary behavior of avoiding humans has been explained by some as the result of the Hundred Years War. The desolated villages, the abundance of corpses and the vulnerability and availability of the mortally wounded, women and children all are considered contributing factors to the development of the man-eating canids. This passage could be made more clear. Who are the people referred to by the statement that this was explained "by some"? What made women and children more "available" to wolves?
  • There are other sources that can be used to expand the article. I found these two on Google Books: The History of the Wolf in Western Civilization and The Wild Dogs in Life and Legend. There are others to be found on Google Scholar.
  • What makes John Knifton a reliable source?
  • Per MOS:POPCULT, we don't include mentions of a subject in novels or other media unless those mentions are discussed in detail in secondary sources. If the only thing we can say is that Cortaud appeared in or inspired a novel, cited to the work itself or a trivial discussion in a review etc, it should not be included. If a source mentioned Cortaud's appearance in those novels while talking about Cortaud's impact or wolves in pop culture, it should be included.
  • Template:Infobox animal can be used.

Images

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Plan_de_Paris_vers_1550_porte_St-Antoine.jpg This should be tagged as a Public Domain image since it seems to be a cropped version of an illustration that is in the public domain.
  • The other two images are tagged correctly.
  • It isn't necessary for a Good Article, but it would be nice to add alt text to the images.
  • If "Loup Anthropophage" is the title of the illustration, it should be in quote marks. If it's not the official title, it can be omitted so the caption would just be "Drawing of a man-eating wolf in Brittany, France (1589)".

This is a really interesting article and it held my attention all the way to the end. I think it needs to be expanded to be broad and the number and quality of the sources used should be improved. Once you've made some progress on that, I will look at it for finer improvements and copyediting. Edward056686 (talk) 22:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

As it's been a few weeks since this article was put on hold, I'm marking it as a "Fail". I think it should be renominated once the nominator has time to expand and improve it. This is an interesting story and a lot of work has been put into the article so far. Edward056686 (talk) 02:53, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks