Talk:Dead Set/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Mosherdude91 (talk · contribs) 15:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Edward056686 (talk · contribs) 03:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

I'll happily review this, really enjoyed the series. Edward056686 (talk) 03:28, 9 April 2026 (UTC)

This article is well-written and factually accurate, broad in its coverage, follows a neutral point of view, and is stable. I didn't see any copyright violations and the logo is fairly used.

I have two suggestions:

  • Adding photos of the showrunners (Charlie Brooker) or stars would help. Not too many, maybe two.
  • The DVD extras doesn't appear to have a source. Edward056686 (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Thanks very much for the review, and I'm glad you enjoyed the series.
I've now addressed the sourcing point for the DVD extras by replacing the unsourced list with sourced prose in the article. I have also added a free image of Charlie Brooker to the Production section, following your suggestion about including an additional image where appropriate. I considered adding a photo of Davina to the filming section as well, but decided it might make the article look a bit crowded.
Please let me know if there is anything else you would like me to address. Thanks again for taking the time to review the article. Mosherdude91 (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
@Mosherdude91: Thanks, I moved the Charlie Brooker image to the legacy and added Davina to the filming section. Edward056686 (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI