Talk:Digital microscope
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Article focus
This article is lacking focus and could probably do with being split to multiple articles; parts of the article focus on commercial USB digital microscopes, ie. webcams with a macro lens, and their function and capabilities. Other parts consider properties of digital microscopy in general and would probably fit better within the optical microscope article.
Please bear this in mind when editing! - Zephyris Talk 14:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Combining Chinese and English versions
The section "Digital eyepiece for microscopes" reads like a marketing
And a rewrite should be considered. Is it an invention at all? ondra (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Digital Microscope Abilities
File:ALDI-traveller-30euro--www.y23.com slash microscope.jpg Nominated for Deletion
An image used in this article, File:ALDI-traveller-30euro--www.y23.com slash microscope.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:ALDI-traveller-30euro--www.y23.com slash microscope.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:15, 22 March 2012 (UTC) |
Delete #Stereo_and_digital_microscopes ?
#Stereo_and_digital_microscopes
adds nothing useful - delete ?
OK, the magnification bit is maybe useful, but stereo ... ?
A stereo microscope gives 2 images from slightly different angles/viewpoints.
That is all.
I can see one digital eyepiece + one eye could be a quick way to work.
Hmmmm ...
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2012 (UTC)