Talk:Electromechanics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vaatkins, Markfgrant, MattDavenport. Peer reviewers: Smaravarman.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:22, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Photos?
Does anybody have any photos of the original Grand Central or Penn Station boards (which are now computer LCD0? Americasroof 02:21, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Name of page
Shouldnt this page be merged with Mechatronics ?--Light current 00:54, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
RF
I'm told that nowadays BAW (Bulk Acoustic Wave) filters are electromechanical devices. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.109.65.205 (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- And SAW. 77.125.210.44 (talk) 05:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Major engineering branches?
The article states that the three pillars of engineering are electrical, mecanical and civil engineering, which seems questionable.--79.116.86.109 (talk) 11:34, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Useless list?
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Electromechanics/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| [[File:Link title
== HeadPRAJESHline text == ]] |
Last edited at 15:53, 25 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 14:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Sahana's Peer Review
This article provides a very good outline of Electromechanics, and is a good general overview. My suggestions for improvement are:
- Have a stronger first sentence, it does not truly encompass all of electromechanics.
- Have more citations in the introduction. I believe that there are no citations in the second or third paragraph.
- Have more subheadings. I think the history is a good section, but the modern practice could be split up to include more specific examples.
- Talk more about the science and engineering that goes into electromechanics.
- Add a section for what the future holds, and include the last paragraph of the modern practice in there.
My suggestions for grammar are:
- Use a comma in the second sentence of the first paragraph before "and how the two disciplines interact with each other."
- I believe that the second sentence of the second paragraph is too long and a bit confusing.
The article is a good start, but I think it would be greatly enhanced with more content and re-organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaravarman (talk • contribs) 17:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC) - Sahana Maravarman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smaravarman (talk • contribs) 16:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)