Talk:Essjay controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former featured article candidateEssjay controversy is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleEssjay controversy has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 7, 2007Articles for deletionNo consensus
March 8, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
March 12, 2007Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
April 11, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
May 6, 2007Articles for deletionKept
September 4, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 1, 2007Good article nomineeListed
September 24, 2008Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 7, 2007.
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article
Close

See also section

@Crazynas, what is unclear? They're both clearly labeled as key early Internet moments of online communities figuring out how to grapple with misrepresented anonymous identity. czar 15:43, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

@Czar: I do see, I just wasn't sure why a cartoon that came out 12 years before the controversy could be relevant. But I understand the connnection as far as the way Essjay presented himself, I'm going to reinstate it without your description (since we don't unusually put descriptions after See Also links do we? Crazynas t 19:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Thanks and yep: "Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent, when the meaning of the term may not be generally known, or when the term is ambiguous." czar 19:16, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

wait he from ky?

think hes from louisville BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 15:54, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Does his photo need to be here?

This article is about nothing more than a super humiliating incident. No encyclopedic value is really lost with the removal of this tiny, poor-quality selfie from 2007. Does anyone object to its removal? ꧁Zanahary꧂ 21:10, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Too much detail

I’m inclined to propose a merge someplace, but at minimum the true crime-level detail here is unnecessary. Way too many quotes from interviews. Zanahary 01:49, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI