Talk:Evarcha bakorensis/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 22:27, 20 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 02:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Jumping spiders are so cute; let's review this article! The Blue Rider 02:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- @The Blue Rider: You are so right! I look forward to your comments. simongraham (talk)
- Sorry for the delay, I should leave more comments tomorrow! The Blue Rider 00:40, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Stability
- Last edit on 20 August; no edit war in place.
Media
- The single photograph is correctly tagged with a copyright status, is relevant for the topic and has a suitable caption.
Copyvio
- Earwigs Copyvio Detector points to 24.2%, that is, violation unlikely; this is due to a reference title.
Taxonomy
- Is it known where the species was first described?
- Clarified. The first examples were collected near Bakoré (hence the specific name) but they are stored in Paris.
- Explain what is phylogenetic classification, perhaps in an explanatory note.
- Expanded with more explanation.
- The taxonomy of this species seems to jump a lot, depending on the scientist. Is there any entity that has authority over its taxonomy? Perhaps the WSC?
- Absolutely. There has been quite a discussion in the literature. I am using the WSC name.
Description
- I think an article about a jumping spider isn't "necessarily technical", as per MOS:JARGON. A rephrase of the terminology would be good for the article.
- I have added explanations to the terms. Please tell me if you see any I have missed.
- @The Blue Rider: Thank you for your comments. I feel they have definitely improved the article. Please tell me if there is more. simongraham (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- I should wrap up this review in some moments, possibly only leaving the source review for later. The Blue Rider 22:44, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- @The Blue Rider: Thank you for your comments. I feel they have definitely improved the article. Please tell me if there is more. simongraham (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have added explanations to the terms. Please tell me if you see any I have missed.
Distribution and habitat
- I feel somewhat torn about adding information about the genus, though I am more inclined to remove it since it may confuse readers.
- Reduced to a small subclass.
- Even though it was only found in three countries, is there no predictions of its possible range?
- Unfortunately not in the sources available.
- I think this section would be better served with a general overview rather than going on detail about specific instances of where it was found.
- I tend to agree but unfortunately the sources encourage exact sitings. I feel it would be original research to extrapolate, but am open to your suggestions.
Lead
- thrives in savanna grasslands -> lives in savanna grasslands
- Changed.
- Detailed descriptions of its measurements and appearance should be removed and/or trimmed.
- Reduced.
- Specify where the first specimen was found in the lead as well.
- Added.
Sources
- All source numbers are from this version. Checked sources:
- 6, OK.
- 19a, mostly OK; doesn't support «Some examples».
- Removed some.
- 23a, OK.
- 23b, OK.
- @The Blue Rider: Thank you. Once again, really useful insights. simongraham (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.