Talk:Ex-Muslim

I actually started this article to keep adding and improving it while having the benefit of criticism and the feedback of other editors. Although there is an article entitled apostasy, I think the movement of ex-Muslims deserver a dedicated entry. Much more can be added to this article and I look forwards to everyone's input.

Sorry but no. Small, self-designated movements do not deserve dedicated entries. After all, this is an encyclopedia, not a webpage. This can easily be redirected as it is now. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, they don't deserve it, but each season of Big Brother does. If that's the Wikipedia consensus you have some screwed up priorities on what belongs in an encyclopedia and what doesn't. The topic is of social, political and scholarly interest, which is more than can be said for many Wikipedia articles that no one is suggesting deleting.

Your article was just an advertisement for several Islamophobic websites, one of which isn't even up due to its servers being hacked . Ex-Muslims are Muslim apostates which is fit for the article "Apostasy in Islam". Yuber^(talk) 01:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Absolutely. Also, non-notable promotions of websites can easily be classified as spam. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:06, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

There is a growing socio-political movement of Ex-Muslims, and given the time and bandwidth dedicated to all the pop culture crap on Wikipedia, I think saying this article is "non-encyclopedic" is kind of sick.

this should just redirect to Apostasy in Islam, which didn't need to go through a prod to do just that... 76.66.200.95 (talk) 04:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)