Talk:Funk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Funk article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Blaxploitation (music genre)" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Blaxploitation (music genre) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 2 § Blaxploitation (music genre) until a consensus is reached. Mach61 20:34, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Mach61 thanks
- goodness Beyonce2026 (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
The “women and funk” term paper
The section “Social Impact” consists entirely of “Women and Funk,” which is little more than a well-sourced but questionable essay on funk musician Betty Davis. Because of its length and specificity, there’s little in it that supports an overarching encyclopedia article on funk music in general, and expanding the notion of “women in funk” using its premise as a starting point would be too big for this article and deserve its own. I support its complete removal, but would like to open a discussion about it first. Thoughts? PacificBoy (talk) 08:02, 27 January 2026 (UTC)