Talk:Fábrica do Arquinho/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA Review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: V.B.Speranza (talk · contribs) 23:49, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reconrabbit (talk · contribs) 15:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Hello. I have reviewed this article. I believe I have to quick fail this nomination right now, because the first paragraph of this article is extremely short and does not summarize all the important details that are in the body, and there are several other issues that I have written below. -- Reconrabbit 15:20, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Prose
- It would help to know the exact year it closed in the first paragraph.
- What is "industrial patrimony" and why does it link to "historic site"?
- "addicts occupied the complex to deal and consume all types of drugs" could be less... accusatory?
- It says that the factory employed hundreds of people, but it is only stated once that it employed 160 people during WW2.
- The description of "important capitalists" needs explanation and additional citation(s).
References
- Many of the references are bare URLs and need to be formatted.
Scope
- Broad: The history has very little information. I would expect to see a more detailed account given that it was "one of the most important factories in Guimarães". What were the "many types of architecture and building methods"?
- Also, there is hardly even a mention of what the factory produced or why/if it was relevant during the World Wars
- Narrow: There is a great deal more focus on the current state of the factory and investments into the property than the history and what the factory did.
Stability
- Neutrality: Not clear if there is undue weight on the current investors, and/or a bias against drug users.
- Edit warring: There is no edit warring on this article. Very stable since creation besides maintenance tags.
Images
- Free/Fair use: The images are public domain or uploaded as "own work" under good licenses.
- Relevance: Pictures are relevant and useful. The logo could be smaller... it's not within criteria, though.
Good Article review progress box
|
