Talk:Geometry Dash/Archive 2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is an archive of past discussions about Geometry Dash. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Semi-protected edit request on 5 November 2021
This edit request to Geometry Dash has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a new section called "Controversies", dealing with the involvement of GuitarHeroStyles (AdvyStyles, Luis Miguel Gil; Cádiz, Spain) in a grooming and rape scandal of October to November 2021. He was accused of the crimes by another player named "zPfanne", and many of his victims came forth with further testimonies. At first, Advy acknowledged the accusations, but later he denied them, stating he had proof that they were false (even though tons of evidence proving the allegations true have been released), and went back to uploading videos on YouTube like nothing happened. As a result, many other notable players in the Geometry Dash community have "cancelled" him, and the official Geometry Dash Demon List has banned him from participation, stripping him of all his records. Later, his Discord account got suspended. On 5 November 2021, a Twitter campaign called "AdvyOut" called for his termination on YouTube, and this hashtag got up to #6 on Twitter Trending. The termination of his channel is likely to follow shortly.
Guitar's channel: . Notice how he has over 2 million subscribers, the most of any YouTube channel specializing in Geometry Dash. Mesijanski Judje (talk) 19:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)- This is generally unrelated to the game, this wouldn't be in the article.
- Wikipedia is NOT gossip, we can't just add this to the article when the only source is an archived Twitter thread with no one in the media covering it.
Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2021
This edit request to Geometry Dash has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
After thorough study of this article, I have come to notice that its main subject seems more like the 2013 video game, rather than an entire series, as most sections mainly apply to the video game titled Geometry Dash. What is more, I think the video game holds more importance than the series, as Meltdown, World and Subzero only exist as extra content to fulfill the player's wish for more, while the video game titled Geometry Dash represents a good 70 to 80% of the whole series. As opposed to something like the Zelda series which as a whole has a huge influence on the industry, the Geometry Dash series holds little importance in its entirety as three of the four games are filler for the last one, while the Geometry Dash video game has helped the rise of indie games and, as such, has had an influence big enough to grant it (in my opinion) the right to have its own Wikipedia page. Therefore, I believe the page would be more relevant if it shifted focus from Geometry Dash (series) to Geometry Dash (video game), the page could probably feature a "Sequels" paragraph in which are mentioned the three side games. If the decision to make the shift was to be made, not a lot of work would have to be done anyway, as most of the article mainly refers to the game. May someone hear my demand and answer it. Thank you.
Edit to clarify the changes I would like to see:
- change "Geometry Dash is a series of music platforming video games developed by Swedish developer Robert Topala, also known as RobTop. The first game, known simply as Geometry Dash, was released on August 13, 2013 on iOS and Android." to "Geometry Dash is a music platforming video game developed by Swedish developer Robert Topala, also known as RobTop, that was released on August 13, 2013 on iOS and Android."
- change "In addition to the original game, 3 other spin-off games in the series have been made: Geometry Dash Meltdown, Geometry Dash World, and Geometry Dash SubZero." to "Since its original release, the game has spanned 3 other spin-off games: Geometry Dash Meltdown, Geometry Dash World, and Geometry Dash SubZero."
- remove the "First release: Geometry Dash" and the "Latest release: Geometry Dash SubZero" sections in the characteristics below the icon
- add a "Series: Geometry Dash" section in the characteristics below the icon
That's all. I hope someone understands my point of view. Thank you. Superaspicot013 (talk) 10:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)- closing editreq melecie t 00:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Typo
Hey, I found a typo in the fourth paragraph of the "Gameplay" section. Can you remove the "the" in or change the speed of the their vehicle"? Edit: Either that or the "their"?
From, L.S.Sweet, 8:13 AM 28 November 2021 (EST)
Done. — Hydrogenation (talk) 17:51, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 5 December 2021
This edit request to Geometry Dash has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first part of the article talks about the game's merchandise: "The game also has online merchandise" It's not official merchandise though, and I think that sentence should be removed (including the reference number 5), or at least change it to "Unofficial merchandise can be found online"
Regards BackThePortal (talk) 22:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
Done — Hydrogenation (talk) 23:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
GD Community
I feel like there should be a section on the game's community. Like reference to popular levels, Youtubers/streamers and the Demon List. I'm very new to Wikipedia though and I don't really know how to do that. SammyWhell (talk) 12:52, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- Welcome to Wikipedia. If you would like to learn more about contributing, check out Help:Introduction. To reply to your request: unless aspects of the community like these have been mentioned in reliable, published sources, it probably should not be in this article. Twotwicetalk 05:15, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
The Geometry Dash community on r/Place
Hey there, GD community hasn't partcipated the r/Place 2017 before r/place was scrapped until 2022. The GD community has making 6 arts, 3 are the most iconic art of GD, which are Michigun Tribute, Riot vs. Cyclic, and 2.2 When? art Can you edit the page? Here is the proof: https://twitter.com/today_gd/status/1511202522693832708?s=20&t=getRqbEeLyhiijTCvtt8Vw — Preceding unsigned comment added by CLSTFL649999 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
Not done While it is true that Geometry Dash community members have made art on r/place, it should not be included unless it is both notable and mentioned by a reliable source. See Reliable sources and Notability for more. Twotwicetalk 16:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 19 April 2022
This edit request to Geometry Dash has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
-Period addition-
Change " and that "families can also talk about rhythm and the joy of dancing in time with music"[16] " to " and that "families can also talk about rhythm and the joy of dancing in time with music."[16]" Rowboat10 (talk) 04:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Adding redirects
I am adding redirects for popular levels in the game. Jishiboka1 (talk) 04:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
"Sakupen Circles" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sakupen Circles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 25#Sakupen Circles until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. EDM fan 2 (talk) 04:48, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Jishiboka1: Redirects are typically not made when the title is not mentioned at the target, and so these redirects you created are likely to be deleted as these titles are obscure. Please see WP:R#DELETE and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. EDM fan 2 (talk) 04:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Update request on development scetion: GD Lite update 2.21 (on 2.2 release preparation)
Semi-protection edit request on July 6, 2022
Semi-protected edit request on 9 August 2022
Geometry dash subzero
Spin-offs Need Their Own Page!
Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2022
Semi-protected edit request on 29 October 2022
Recent addition of content
Semi-protected edit request on 8 October 2022
Robert Topala
Semi-protected edit request on 9 December 2022
I have noticed a discrepancy between Release Dates
Semi-protected edit request on 15 May 2023
Ambiguity
DA NUMBERS ARE OFF
Semi-protected edit request on 5 July 2023
Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2023
Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2023
Semi-protected edit request on 24 December 2023
Semi-protected edit request on 26 December 2023
Typo that I can't fix due to the article being semi-protected
Change the latest version of Geometry Dash to state version 2.2, 2023
History
Semi-protected edit request on 16 January 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2024
Could we add a controversy section?
Release Date of Geometry Dash 2.2
Change name of levels rated by RobTop
Semi-protected edit request on 15 January 2024
"Check Steam" listed at Redirects for discussion
"Community of Geometry Dash" listed at Redirects for discussion
Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 2 May 2024 (2)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 May 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 12 May 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 14 May 2024
hey, why's toe song isn't in "theory of everything (disambiguation)"
vault
Redirects
"Geometrical Dominator" listed at Redirects for discussion
Third-Party Modifications
Licensing information regarding the game's "Extreme demon" difficulty face
Should I add Category:Video game engines
updates as subheadings?
Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2024
Improvement on page
Small Update
Example of a custom level?
Semi-protected edit request on 30 December 2024
Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2024
Updates
acronyms
boomlings matchup
Semi-protected edit request on 27 January 2025
App icon is wrong
pre-release trailer information
2.2
Gameplay Section
Community (or something similar) section
Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2025
Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2025
New sources
Gameplay demonstration on a custom level idea
"Fire in the hole!" listed at Redirects for discussion
"Draft:Fire in the hole!" listed at Redirects for discussion
"Draft:Lobotomy Dash" listed at Redirects for discussion
Why is there No Wikipedia Page for Robtop??
"Lobotomy Dash" listed at Redirects for discussion
"Draft:Lobotomy Dash" listed at Redirects for discussion
Outdated
"DJVI" listed at Redirects for discussion
Small error
Development dates
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Geometry Dash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ZKevinTheCat (talk · contribs) 11:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reverosie (talk · contribs) 02:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be your GA reviewer. I'm currently attempting to find and review high viewership articles, and this one receives 1.2 million yearly views. I also have a bit of background knowledge on this game, which will help me during this review. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 02:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Spot check
I'll move to the spot check now.
- Source 9
- Article says:
Each level is assigned one of six difficulties: 'Easy', 'Normal', 'Hard', 'Harder', 'Insane', and 'Demon'.
- Source says: The source displays a table with each of the six difficulties mentioned above. Pass.
- Article says:
- Source 21
- Article says:
He [Topala] remarked, 'It simply started as a template with a cube that could crash and jump'; 'There really was no detailed plan'.
- Source says:
“It simply started as a template with a cube that could crash and jump. Through different iterations I then kept adding more and more features and content until the game felt right.”
and“There really was no detailed plan” for Geometry Dash, Topala says.
Very obvious pass.
- Article says:
- Sources 27 and 28
- Article says:
The gameplay was also met with generally high regards. Both Downdload.com and Coop described the gameplay as "addicting",
- Sources say:
Geometry Dash stands as one of the most challenging and addictive games ever released on iOS
(Coop) andGeometry Dash’s easy to learn mechanics combined with its tough challenges create an addictive experience that appeals to casual and hardcore gamers alike
(Download.com). Pass
- Article says:
The spot check looks good. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:59, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Format
My formatting for the review will look like this:
I'll be abbreviating the paragraph and sentence I'm referring to in my suggestions to P and S. For example, paragraph 2, sentence 2 would be P2S2. The paragraph counter also resets with each new section.
I'll be adding more sections as I go instead of posting my entire review at once and having you wait
Please use the
Done template or strikethrough to indicate that a problem has been fixed, and add any comments/questions after the points that you have. If you don't agree with one of my suggestions, please tell me, and we can discuss it. Some comments will be marked as "suggestions"; these are recommendations, not requirements, and you don't have to take them! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 00:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Infobox
- RobTop is cited as the game's only composer, though many of the game's main levels use songs written by various artists on NewGrounds. Maybe there could be a way to incorporate this?
Done
Other than that, the infobox looks good
Lead
- Suggestion: P1S6:
Players can collect in-game currency—such as stars, moons, secret coins, user coins, mana orbs, diamonds, and shards—from official and user-generated levels or chests to unlock customization options for their icon.
This is a lot for the lead. I'd suggest saying "such as stars, moons, and mana orbs" since those are the three most important examples in my opinion, but I'll leave it up to you.
Done - P2S3:
...being inspired off of other titles such as The Impossible Game and Super Meat Boy.
I'd suggest saying "being inspired by other titles" instead for clarity- I think this should stay personally. When writing leads I try to think of what the reader would want to know about the topic, so I try to get into the details at least a bit. Leaving it as "he was inspired off of other titles" is too vague in my opinion, and would leave the reader unsatisfied.
- Oh no! I think it should stay too. I meant that "off of" should be replaced by "by", but the section remains there 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 16:57, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I got it. This is
Done now ZKevinTheCat (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think this should stay personally. When writing leads I try to think of what the reader would want to know about the topic, so I try to get into the details at least a bit. Leaving it as "he was inspired off of other titles" is too vague in my opinion, and would leave the reader unsatisfied.
- Suggestion: P3S2:
The level creating feature
I'd suggest saying "level creation" instead. I'd also suggest linking the article for level editors here first instead of later.
Done - P3S2:
and has spawned a large and growing community of players that have created many millions of online levels, including challenges, art projects, and even recreating other video games inside of levels.
This sentence is very long. I'd suggest editing it a bit. Maybe something along the lines of "...and has attracted a large community of players who have created millions of online levels including challenges, art projects, and recreations of other video games."
Done - P4: I'd suggest mentioning GD Lite before mentioning the spinoff games
Done - Suggestion: P4S3:
although feature their own levels and music separately.
I'd suggest saying "but feature their own levels and music" instead for clarity
Done
Gameplay
- P1S2:
The game's control scheme is extremely simple; there is only one button the player can use to control their icon, navigating through auto-scrolling levels until the end is reached
Loaded words. I'd suggest saying something like "The player uses one button to control their icon, navigating..." instead.
Done - Suggestion: P1S6:
including portals, pads, and orbs that change the player's gravity, speed, size, direction, and gamemode.
I'd suggest specifying what each of these things do instead of lumping them all together.- Most of these speak for themselves honestly, and the gamemodes are explained in the next sentence.
- Strongly encouraged suggestion: An image displaying another gamemode besides the cube could be helpful. I found a screenshot of Hexagon Force with dual ship gameplay on russian wikipedia's article. Maybe we could use that image here?
- This section should probably list each of the gamemodes
- I don't know if I have a source for this and I don't think this is really necessary.
- P1S10:
There are four official platformer levels which are located in a section of the game called 'The Tower'.
Since this is mentioned again in the next sentence, it's redundant here.
Done - P2S3:
There are three demon levels among the main levels, and the player must obtain a certain number of secret coins before they can be played.
I'd suggest rearranging this sentence to read better. Perhaps something like "The player must obtain a certain number of secret coins to unlock the three demon-difficulty levels" (Listing their names isn't necessary in my opinion, but we can if it would help)- I don't have a source for the amount of secret coins needed
- P3S2:
including the icon's design in different gamemodes, primary and secondary colors, death explosion effects, and trails.
"The icon's design, colors, death effect, and trail" would be more concise in my opinion
Done
User-generated content
- Possible suggestion: I'm not sure how this would work in regards to copyright, but in my opinion, an image of a user-generated level would be very helpful in this article. Any famous or high-quality level would do, but I'd suggest choosing Bloodbath, as it's not only a very famous level, but also showcases the extreme demon difficulty mentioned in this section.
- Adding something like this would be fine in my opinion for copyright (as long as guidlines are followed obv) and it would also adress your other suggestion about showing gamemodes, but I'm still not sure about doing it. Someone earlier added an image of the level editor which I think would be better, but it was removed because of some technical issues (i explained in an edit log i think). I could make my own version of this image possibly though.
- P1S4:
User-made levels of sufficient quality may be "rated" by Topala, which will set the official difficulty rating of the level. Only rated levels award collectibles.
I'd suggest saying like "Which will set the official difficulty and make the level award collectibles like stars and orbs." instead to be concise.- Not sure how or even if I want to do this; I can't really find a way to merge the two without creating ambiguity or a run-on sentence.
- P1S6:
which are collected in a similar way to secret coins
I'd suggest saying "which are similar to secret coins" instead for clarity (and since many user-created levels have secret coin routes that are nothing like the main levels)
Done - P2S2:
Some parts of the community are dedicated to making levels as difficult as possible,
I'd suggest mentioning the demon list somewhere here as well- I've thought about this and I don't know how I feel about it; I just don't think this info is necessary and could easily just become a trivia section about demons, which has happened before.
- It's easy enough to note "The community maintains a list of the hardest levels, and players who beat them earn significant prestige." or similar, though I'm not sure whether a source could back it up. Perhaps with an inline comment to specify that editors should not specify what the hardest level currently is? Corsaka (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- I've thought about this and I don't know how I feel about it; I just don't think this info is necessary and could easily just become a trivia section about demons, which has happened before.
- General: This section should mention the gauntlets (and their corresponding contests) and map packs.
- General: This section should also mention the daily level, weekly demon, and event level.
- Undecided on this and the above
- Something to point out: General: Wikimedia commons has an audio file of electroman adventures v3:
I'll leave it up to you if the article should use this or not.
- There was actually an audio file for Stereo Madness on the page at some point but it got removed from Commons. This song isn't even from an official level so I don't really see a reason to add it.
Logo
The game's logo should be added to this article. I found an image of it on Wikimedia Commons:
Done
GA Review Information
I'm making a slight change to the way I review GANs and wanted to let you know about it. I find it useless to point out small grammatical suggestions in these reviews that I could easily fix myself. My suggestions will relate to things that require your thought and attention, not small things that I can do myself without bothering you. So, if the review seems short and concise, it's because I'm fixing the very minor grammatical errors instead of pointing them out without doing anything. This will be effective immediately, and I'm sorry to change my strategy in the middle of the review, but it will be completed much faster now. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Post-Release
This section, in general, is far too short. The article immediately skips to update 2.1 after the game's release without anything else being mentioned. Perhaps a chronology of the game's updates (as seen on French Wikipedia's article) could help here. The article also neglects to mention any of the content released in any update besides 2.2. Overall, the section needs quite a bit of work.
- This really bugs me because I have searched for multiple hours trying to find sources for post release stuff. Basically the only source I found was from the version museum, which we've cut out of this article because it's unreliable (see the talk page discussion). If you could find a source that would be great, but I really doubt there are any out there. I really am not sure how to deal with this. Even a chronology might not work because the app store only saved update release dates back to 1.2, and I have not found a reliable source for the 1.1 release date.
- I spent quite a bit of time looking, and you're right. Since I found nothing myself, I'll let you off of the hook here.
Closing remarks
The article generally looks good, but I still have a few comments before I pass it.
1. I understand the struggle with sources, but having so much information about the game's chronology/updates missing from the article as a result of this is alarming. I read over the thread explaining why the Version Museum is not reliable, and I agree that we should not use it.
My proposal for a solution is quite far-fetched, but it's the only idea I have at the moment: citing the game itself (via previous versions of it on internet archive) to point out new features released from the beginning instead of skipping to 2.1. However, I'm not sure exactly how this would work, and I understand if it does not.
- I'm also not sure how this would work and I highly doubt this would be an appropriate way to cite this info, considering an entire section would be based on a primary source. This also wouldn't give release dates.
2. I'd like closure regarding the inclusion of gauntlets/gauntlet contests, map packs, daily levels, weekly demons, and event levels in the article. I did notice that daily levels and weekly demons are mentioned in GD World's section of the article, but nothing here points to them being in the main game. I personally think that these are key features worth mentioning.
Done
3. I notice that you added the game's logo to the article, but in doing so, you replaced the app icon. Please add the app icon back somewhere.
- This image was deleted from Commons
That's all from me. This article is very well-written, but has a few gaps that need to be addressed before I can pass it 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Replying to this message because I'm not sure you were notified of my edits.
-ZKevinTheCat
Courtesy ping to Reverosie. --PresN 13:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- @ZKevinTheCat@PresN Hello! I'm so sorry this took so long for me to get to! I've been very busy off of Wikipedia lately, and I'm just now getting back. As I've already said on my talk page, the part about the game's history is an enigma to me; we do NOT have any sources, but the section is very desolate and nowhere near GA status for that reason. I'm not sure what to do, and may want a second opinion on the matter. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 17:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Reverosie and ZKevinTheCat. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 16:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Reverosie @ZKevinTheCat What's the status of this review? Tarlby (t) (c) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure. A bot did send me a notification yesterday that the article was still under review, but I haven't heard anything about the article directly from Reverosie in a while. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Rev might've literally forgotten about this review considering she's working on other reviews in the mean time, lol. Tarlby (t) (c) 21:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't forget about this, I'm so sorry! I'm just very much lost on where to go from here and forgot to ask for a second opinion. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I've also been far more busy outside of Wikipedia, but that's no excuse! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't forget about this, I'm so sorry! I'm just very much lost on where to go from here and forgot to ask for a second opinion. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Rev might've literally forgotten about this review considering she's working on other reviews in the mean time, lol. Tarlby (t) (c) 21:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure. A bot did send me a notification yesterday that the article was still under review, but I haven't heard anything about the article directly from Reverosie in a while. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Reverosie @ZKevinTheCat What's the status of this review? Tarlby (t) (c) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@Reverosie and ZKevinTheCat: I found my way here after seeing the second opinion request at WP:GAN. As it looks to me, the article appears to be in good shape. If further sourcing existed but was missing from the article that would be a problem, but if each of you have searched extensively and come up dry, that's not a knock against the article, in my opinion. WP:GACR says good articles must be broad in their coverage, not comprehensive, and I believe this article meets that standard (if the Development section was one or two sentences long I'd have more of an issue, but what's there doesn't qualify as desolate
, I don't think). So that's my two cents, but I'll leave the final decision to the reviewer. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 14:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- @ZKevinTheCat I'd like to sincerely apologize to you for how long this review took. Truly, it exemplified all of the things that I need to fix as a reviewer, and your experience shouldn't have been like this. I'd like to make it up to you.
- For your next five GA reviews, once you've nominated the article, simply leave a message on my talk page, and I will get it done for you as quickly as possible. My conduct as a reviewer was simply unacceptable, and you, as the nominator, deserved far better than you got.
- The article will be passed now. Congratulations!! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 22:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Some additional stuff
Semi-protected edit request on 29 August 2025
"Geometry Challenge" listed at Redirects for discussion
What happened to the old logo for the page?
Please add other spinoff games not created by RobTop
In-game currency
Style and Theme should be merged into one subsection
Geode/megahack
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Geometry Dash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: ZKevinTheCat (talk · contribs) 11:33, 30 July 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Reverosie (talk · contribs) 02:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be your GA reviewer. I'm currently attempting to find and review high viewership articles, and this one receives 1.2 million yearly views. I also have a bit of background knowledge on this game, which will help me during this review. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 02:22, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Spot check
I'll move to the spot check now.
- Source 9
- Article says:
Each level is assigned one of six difficulties: 'Easy', 'Normal', 'Hard', 'Harder', 'Insane', and 'Demon'.
- Source says: The source displays a table with each of the six difficulties mentioned above. Pass.
- Article says:
- Source 21
- Article says:
He [Topala] remarked, 'It simply started as a template with a cube that could crash and jump'; 'There really was no detailed plan'.
- Source says:
“It simply started as a template with a cube that could crash and jump. Through different iterations I then kept adding more and more features and content until the game felt right.”
and“There really was no detailed plan” for Geometry Dash, Topala says.
Very obvious pass.
- Article says:
- Sources 27 and 28
- Article says:
The gameplay was also met with generally high regards. Both Downdload.com and Coop described the gameplay as "addicting",
- Sources say:
Geometry Dash stands as one of the most challenging and addictive games ever released on iOS
(Coop) andGeometry Dash’s easy to learn mechanics combined with its tough challenges create an addictive experience that appeals to casual and hardcore gamers alike
(Download.com). Pass
- Article says:
The spot check looks good. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:59, 8 August 2025 (UTC)
Format
My formatting for the review will look like this:
I'll be abbreviating the paragraph and sentence I'm referring to in my suggestions to P and S. For example, paragraph 2, sentence 2 would be P2S2. The paragraph counter also resets with each new section.
I'll be adding more sections as I go instead of posting my entire review at once and having you wait
Please use the
Done template or strikethrough to indicate that a problem has been fixed, and add any comments/questions after the points that you have. If you don't agree with one of my suggestions, please tell me, and we can discuss it. Some comments will be marked as "suggestions"; these are recommendations, not requirements, and you don't have to take them! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 00:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Infobox
- RobTop is cited as the game's only composer, though many of the game's main levels use songs written by various artists on NewGrounds. Maybe there could be a way to incorporate this?
Done
Other than that, the infobox looks good
Lead
- Suggestion: P1S6:
Players can collect in-game currency—such as stars, moons, secret coins, user coins, mana orbs, diamonds, and shards—from official and user-generated levels or chests to unlock customization options for their icon.
This is a lot for the lead. I'd suggest saying "such as stars, moons, and mana orbs" since those are the three most important examples in my opinion, but I'll leave it up to you.
Done - P2S3:
...being inspired off of other titles such as The Impossible Game and Super Meat Boy.
I'd suggest saying "being inspired by other titles" instead for clarity- I think this should stay personally. When writing leads I try to think of what the reader would want to know about the topic, so I try to get into the details at least a bit. Leaving it as "he was inspired off of other titles" is too vague in my opinion, and would leave the reader unsatisfied.
- Oh no! I think it should stay too. I meant that "off of" should be replaced by "by", but the section remains there 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 16:57, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I got it. This is
Done now ZKevinTheCat (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think this should stay personally. When writing leads I try to think of what the reader would want to know about the topic, so I try to get into the details at least a bit. Leaving it as "he was inspired off of other titles" is too vague in my opinion, and would leave the reader unsatisfied.
- Suggestion: P3S2:
The level creating feature
I'd suggest saying "level creation" instead. I'd also suggest linking the article for level editors here first instead of later.
Done - P3S2:
and has spawned a large and growing community of players that have created many millions of online levels, including challenges, art projects, and even recreating other video games inside of levels.
This sentence is very long. I'd suggest editing it a bit. Maybe something along the lines of "...and has attracted a large community of players who have created millions of online levels including challenges, art projects, and recreations of other video games."
Done - P4: I'd suggest mentioning GD Lite before mentioning the spinoff games
Done - Suggestion: P4S3:
although feature their own levels and music separately.
I'd suggest saying "but feature their own levels and music" instead for clarity
Done
Gameplay
- P1S2:
The game's control scheme is extremely simple; there is only one button the player can use to control their icon, navigating through auto-scrolling levels until the end is reached
Loaded words. I'd suggest saying something like "The player uses one button to control their icon, navigating..." instead.
Done - Suggestion: P1S6:
including portals, pads, and orbs that change the player's gravity, speed, size, direction, and gamemode.
I'd suggest specifying what each of these things do instead of lumping them all together.- Most of these speak for themselves honestly, and the gamemodes are explained in the next sentence.
- Strongly encouraged suggestion: An image displaying another gamemode besides the cube could be helpful. I found a screenshot of Hexagon Force with dual ship gameplay on russian wikipedia's article. Maybe we could use that image here?
- This section should probably list each of the gamemodes
- I don't know if I have a source for this and I don't think this is really necessary.
- P1S10:
There are four official platformer levels which are located in a section of the game called 'The Tower'.
Since this is mentioned again in the next sentence, it's redundant here.
Done - P2S3:
There are three demon levels among the main levels, and the player must obtain a certain number of secret coins before they can be played.
I'd suggest rearranging this sentence to read better. Perhaps something like "The player must obtain a certain number of secret coins to unlock the three demon-difficulty levels" (Listing their names isn't necessary in my opinion, but we can if it would help)- I don't have a source for the amount of secret coins needed
- P3S2:
including the icon's design in different gamemodes, primary and secondary colors, death explosion effects, and trails.
"The icon's design, colors, death effect, and trail" would be more concise in my opinion
Done
User-generated content
- Possible suggestion: I'm not sure how this would work in regards to copyright, but in my opinion, an image of a user-generated level would be very helpful in this article. Any famous or high-quality level would do, but I'd suggest choosing Bloodbath, as it's not only a very famous level, but also showcases the extreme demon difficulty mentioned in this section.
- Adding something like this would be fine in my opinion for copyright (as long as guidlines are followed obv) and it would also adress your other suggestion about showing gamemodes, but I'm still not sure about doing it. Someone earlier added an image of the level editor which I think would be better, but it was removed because of some technical issues (i explained in an edit log i think). I could make my own version of this image possibly though.
- P1S4:
User-made levels of sufficient quality may be "rated" by Topala, which will set the official difficulty rating of the level. Only rated levels award collectibles.
I'd suggest saying like "Which will set the official difficulty and make the level award collectibles like stars and orbs." instead to be concise.- Not sure how or even if I want to do this; I can't really find a way to merge the two without creating ambiguity or a run-on sentence.
- P1S6:
which are collected in a similar way to secret coins
I'd suggest saying "which are similar to secret coins" instead for clarity (and since many user-created levels have secret coin routes that are nothing like the main levels)
Done - P2S2:
Some parts of the community are dedicated to making levels as difficult as possible,
I'd suggest mentioning the demon list somewhere here as well- I've thought about this and I don't know how I feel about it; I just don't think this info is necessary and could easily just become a trivia section about demons, which has happened before.
- It's easy enough to note "The community maintains a list of the hardest levels, and players who beat them earn significant prestige." or similar, though I'm not sure whether a source could back it up. Perhaps with an inline comment to specify that editors should not specify what the hardest level currently is? Corsaka (talk) 14:52, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- I've thought about this and I don't know how I feel about it; I just don't think this info is necessary and could easily just become a trivia section about demons, which has happened before.
- General: This section should mention the gauntlets (and their corresponding contests) and map packs.
- General: This section should also mention the daily level, weekly demon, and event level.
- Undecided on this and the above
- Something to point out: General: Wikimedia commons has an audio file of electroman adventures v3:
I'll leave it up to you if the article should use this or not.
- There was actually an audio file for Stereo Madness on the page at some point but it got removed from Commons. This song isn't even from an official level so I don't really see a reason to add it.
Logo
The game's logo should be added to this article. I found an image of it on Wikimedia Commons:
Done
GA Review Information
I'm making a slight change to the way I review GANs and wanted to let you know about it. I find it useless to point out small grammatical suggestions in these reviews that I could easily fix myself. My suggestions will relate to things that require your thought and attention, not small things that I can do myself without bothering you. So, if the review seems short and concise, it's because I'm fixing the very minor grammatical errors instead of pointing them out without doing anything. This will be effective immediately, and I'm sorry to change my strategy in the middle of the review, but it will be completed much faster now. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:34, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Post-Release
This section, in general, is far too short. The article immediately skips to update 2.1 after the game's release without anything else being mentioned. Perhaps a chronology of the game's updates (as seen on French Wikipedia's article) could help here. The article also neglects to mention any of the content released in any update besides 2.2. Overall, the section needs quite a bit of work.
- This really bugs me because I have searched for multiple hours trying to find sources for post release stuff. Basically the only source I found was from the version museum, which we've cut out of this article because it's unreliable (see the talk page discussion). If you could find a source that would be great, but I really doubt there are any out there. I really am not sure how to deal with this. Even a chronology might not work because the app store only saved update release dates back to 1.2, and I have not found a reliable source for the 1.1 release date.
- I spent quite a bit of time looking, and you're right. Since I found nothing myself, I'll let you off of the hook here.
Closing remarks
The article generally looks good, but I still have a few comments before I pass it.
1. I understand the struggle with sources, but having so much information about the game's chronology/updates missing from the article as a result of this is alarming. I read over the thread explaining why the Version Museum is not reliable, and I agree that we should not use it.
My proposal for a solution is quite far-fetched, but it's the only idea I have at the moment: citing the game itself (via previous versions of it on internet archive) to point out new features released from the beginning instead of skipping to 2.1. However, I'm not sure exactly how this would work, and I understand if it does not.
- I'm also not sure how this would work and I highly doubt this would be an appropriate way to cite this info, considering an entire section would be based on a primary source. This also wouldn't give release dates.
2. I'd like closure regarding the inclusion of gauntlets/gauntlet contests, map packs, daily levels, weekly demons, and event levels in the article. I did notice that daily levels and weekly demons are mentioned in GD World's section of the article, but nothing here points to them being in the main game. I personally think that these are key features worth mentioning.
Done
3. I notice that you added the game's logo to the article, but in doing so, you replaced the app icon. Please add the app icon back somewhere.
- This image was deleted from Commons
That's all from me. This article is very well-written, but has a few gaps that need to be addressed before I can pass it 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 23:23, 22 August 2025 (UTC)
- Replying to this message because I'm not sure you were notified of my edits.
-ZKevinTheCat
Courtesy ping to Reverosie. --PresN 13:30, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- @ZKevinTheCat@PresN Hello! I'm so sorry this took so long for me to get to! I've been very busy off of Wikipedia lately, and I'm just now getting back. As I've already said on my talk page, the part about the game's history is an enigma to me; we do NOT have any sources, but the section is very desolate and nowhere near GA status for that reason. I'm not sure what to do, and may want a second opinion on the matter. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 17:01, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Pinging Reverosie and ZKevinTheCat. — 🌙Eclipse (she/they/all neos • talk • edits) 16:00, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Reverosie @ZKevinTheCat What's the status of this review? Tarlby (t) (c) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure. A bot did send me a notification yesterday that the article was still under review, but I haven't heard anything about the article directly from Reverosie in a while. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Rev might've literally forgotten about this review considering she's working on other reviews in the mean time, lol. Tarlby (t) (c) 21:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't forget about this, I'm so sorry! I'm just very much lost on where to go from here and forgot to ask for a second opinion. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I've also been far more busy outside of Wikipedia, but that's no excuse! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- I didn't forget about this, I'm so sorry! I'm just very much lost on where to go from here and forgot to ask for a second opinion. 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 21:50, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Rev might've literally forgotten about this review considering she's working on other reviews in the mean time, lol. Tarlby (t) (c) 21:29, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- Not sure. A bot did send me a notification yesterday that the article was still under review, but I haven't heard anything about the article directly from Reverosie in a while. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 21:26, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Reverosie @ZKevinTheCat What's the status of this review? Tarlby (t) (c) 19:36, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
@Reverosie and ZKevinTheCat: I found my way here after seeing the second opinion request at WP:GAN. As it looks to me, the article appears to be in good shape. If further sourcing existed but was missing from the article that would be a problem, but if each of you have searched extensively and come up dry, that's not a knock against the article, in my opinion. WP:GACR says good articles must be broad in their coverage, not comprehensive, and I believe this article meets that standard (if the Development section was one or two sentences long I'd have more of an issue, but what's there doesn't qualify as desolate
, I don't think). So that's my two cents, but I'll leave the final decision to the reviewer. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 14:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- @ZKevinTheCat I'd like to sincerely apologize to you for how long this review took. Truly, it exemplified all of the things that I need to fix as a reviewer, and your experience shouldn't have been like this. I'd like to make it up to you.
- For your next five GA reviews, once you've nominated the article, simply leave a message on my talk page, and I will get it done for you as quickly as possible. My conduct as a reviewer was simply unacceptable, and you, as the nominator, deserved far better than you got.
- The article will be passed now. Congratulations!! 🌷Reverosie🌷★talk★ 22:24, 14 October 2025 (UTC)