Talk:Gizmodgery/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: KmartEmployeeTor (talk · contribs) 09:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: RedShellMomentum (talk · contribs) 09:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Will review tomorrow. RedShellMomentum 09:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

Alright, will review now. RedShellMomentum 20:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

so did we fail or pass KmartEmployeeTor (talk) 22:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
Sorry, I was working heavily on other articles. I'll take a look at it now. RedShellMomentum 22:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
@KmartEmployeeTor: Additional comments below. RedShellMomentum 22:33, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
@KmartEmployeeTor: I'll place this On hold so you can fix the issues addressed below. RedShellMomentum 05:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
Let me know what you think, are the fixes okay? I've fixed the lyrics and legacy sections. The lead, production, release, commercial performance, charts and reference sections were done by @Popturtle earlier yesterday. KmartEmployeeTor (talk) 17:07, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
 Pass now. Everything looks good; thank you for your work! RedShellMomentum 17:21, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Lead

  • received critical acclaimreceived generally positive reviews.
  • Some chart and sales details are repeated later, so trimming them could make it more concise.

Background

Great!

Production

  • Consider cutting minor studio anecdotes to keep the flow smooth.

Music and lyrics

Great!

Style and influences

Great!

Lyrics

  • Some interpretive statements could be more clearly linked to their sources.

Artwork

Great!

Release

  • A bit of trimming is suggested to prevent overwhelming readers with too many promotional details.

Reception

Great!

Legacy

  • Make it clear that calling something a sleeper hit means it's being recognized as such only after a later reevaluation.

Commercial performance

  • Try simplifying the week-by-week chart movement.

Track listing

Great!

Personnel

Great!

Charts

  • I don't think we need "What a Fool Believes"'s chart performance here.

References

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI