Talk:Gizmodgery/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: KmartEmployeeTor (talk · contribs) 09:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: RedShellMomentum (talk · contribs) 09:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Will review tomorrow. RedShellMomentum 09:49, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
Alright, will review now. RedShellMomentum 20:22, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- so did we fail or pass KmartEmployeeTor (talk) 22:08, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was working heavily on other articles. I'll take a look at it now. RedShellMomentum 22:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @KmartEmployeeTor: Additional comments below. RedShellMomentum 22:33, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- @KmartEmployeeTor: I'll place this
On hold so you can fix the issues addressed below. RedShellMomentum 05:08, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- @KmartEmployeeTor: I'll place this
- @KmartEmployeeTor: Additional comments below. RedShellMomentum 22:33, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was working heavily on other articles. I'll take a look at it now. RedShellMomentum 22:11, 31 December 2025 (UTC)
| GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
|---|
|
|
Overall: |
Lead
- received critical acclaim → received generally positive reviews.
- Some chart and sales details are repeated later, so trimming them could make it more concise.
Background
Production
- Consider cutting minor studio anecdotes to keep the flow smooth.
Music and lyrics
Style and influences
Lyrics
- Some interpretive statements could be more clearly linked to their sources.
Artwork
Release
- A bit of trimming is suggested to prevent overwhelming readers with too many promotional details.
Reception
Legacy
- Make it clear that calling something a sleeper hit means it's being recognized as such only after a later reevaluation.
Commercial performance
- Try simplifying the week-by-week chart movement.
Track listing
Personnel
Charts
- I don't think we need "What a Fool Believes"'s chart performance here.
References
- Some magazine citations need to use
{{cite magazine}}. Same with newspapers and{{cite news}}.
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.