Talk:Hong Chengchou
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Hong Chengchou is currently a World history good article nominee. Nominated by Changdao1644 (talk) at 07:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
 | Hong Chengchou was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 8, 2026, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hong Chengchou/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Changdao1644 (talk · contribs) 19:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 03:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to quick fail this one. There's quite a bit of puffery going on, including words like "villainised", "interesting" and "great [skills]" that can compromise neutrality. Terms such as "in fact" are also deemed redundant on Wikipedia... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 03:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)