Talk:Hunfrid of Prüm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Hunfrid of Prüm is currently a Philosophy and religion good article nominee. Nominated by User:Hunfridus871 at 04:35, 12 April 2026 (UTC) This article is ready to be reviewed in accordance with the good article criteria. Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review the article and decide if it should be listed as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the instructions. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Find all the info you can!
I'm Landen Humphrey, this page was once just one paragraph, now its many, with info I found in old books, I want you all to help, I even got to offically write about him in a historical journal! Landen Humphrey (or Hunfrid!) (talk) 09:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Hunfrid of Prüm/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Landen Humphrey (or Hunfrid!) (talk · contribs) 06:55, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Phlsph7 (talk · contribs) 09:17, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
Hello Hunfridus871 and thanks for all your improvements to this article. However, despite the improvements, the article fails criterion 2b since there are too many unreferenced paragraphs. Examples are the paragraphs starting with "Hunfrid's presence in this manuscript, created shortly after his death", "A gilded reliquary casket housed at Arras Cathedral in northern France", "The central front face features a pointed Gothic arch containing", and the whole section "Legacy". According to criterion 2b, these and similar passages require inline citations "no later than the end of the paragraph". I suggest that you add all the relevant references before a renomination.
A few other observations
- WP:EARWIG detects no copyvios
- Reference [8], which is used several times, seems to cite a conversation group on Google. This is an unreliable source and the page in not accessible anymore.
- Reference [10] cites a French Wikipedia article, which is an unreliable source. Phlsph7 (talk) 09:17, 11 April 2026 (UTC)