Talk:IHS Towers

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 20 August 2015 by reviewer Alpha Monarch (talk · contribs).

Nigeria: Lagos

	Nigeria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NigeriaWikipedia:WikiProject NigeriaTemplate:WikiProject NigeriaNigeria
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Lagos.

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The user below has a request that an edit be made to IHS Towers. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest.
The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 433 requests waiting for review.

Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I am a paid editor and have a conflict of interest, so I am raising this policy concern here rather than editing the article directly. I also note that the article is currently tagged for COI.

The final paragraph reporting MTN Group results and referring to a €4 billion whistleblower complaint raises several policy concerns.

On March 16th, 2026, MTN Group reports exceptional 2025 results, unveils evolved platform strategy [45] The same day, a €4 billion ($4.3 billion) whistleblower complaint against MTN Group is reported to be making its way through the US Securities Exchange Commission in the United States of America; a contingent liability of up about 70% of the value of MTN’s recently announced $6.2-billion (R103-billion) merger with IHS Towers. AC Shining Stars (ACS), the claimant, claims that this liability has not been disclosed in MTN’s official 2025 financial statements or the IHS merger proxy filings.[46][47]

The paragraph appears to be in breach of Wikipedia policy for the following reasons:

1) Sourcing (WP:RS / WP:V) The claim appears to rely on limited coverage, including primary material and reporting based on statements by the complainant. There does not appear to be sufficient high-quality, independent secondary sourcing to support the claims as presented. The reference to a €4 billion “contingent liability” is not clearly attributed to a reliable, independent source, and the nature of the claims is presented with a level of detail and certainty that is not supported by the available sourcing. This raises concerns about verifiability and neutrality.

2) Relevance to the subject (WP:UNDUE / WP:NOTNEWS) The allegation concerns MTN Group rather than IHS Towers. While there is a proposed transaction between the companies, they remain separate entities. The material does not appear to relate directly to the operations, governance, or activities of IHS Towers, and it is not evident that the allegation is sufficiently direct or material to IHS Towers to justify inclusion in this article.

 3) Undue weight and recentism (WP:UNDUE / WP:RECENT) This appears to be a single, early-stage allegation with very limited coverage. Giving it a full paragraph, with detailed financial framing, risks giving it disproportionate weight relative to its significance.

Given the above, I suggest that the paragraph is removed. If editors consider that some mention is warranted, I suggest it should be substantially reduced, clearly attributed, and supported by stronger independent sources.

I would also welcome views on whether the current COI tag remains necessary once this content issue has been resolved, or whether it may be appropriate to remove it at that point.

Floralnotessea (talk) 11:49, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Edit request: relevance, sourcing and neutrality concerns

Related Articles