Talk:I Forgot That You Existed/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 19:44, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 20:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)


I'm having some issues with my computer but hopefully still maganing to review this article later either way. CatchMe (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for taking on the review, CatchMe! No rush at all, take your time :)) Medxvo (talk) 21:02, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Top

  • "...on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart and the top 40 on the national charts..." - I would remove "chart" to avoid repetition.
    • Done
  • "It received platinum certifications in Australia and Brazil, and a silver certification in the United Kingdom." - Again to avoid repetition (certification/s) you could paraphrase it as "It was certified platinum in Australia and Brazil, and silver in the United Kingdom".
    • Done

Background and release

  • See above regarding the certifications.
    • Done
  • Why is New Zealand Hot Singles the only chart not mentioned here?
    • Added

Production and composition

  • I think the ref 26 isn't supporting anything in its first use and doesn't belong there? (After "with Auto-Tuned vocal performance.")
    • You're right
  • "...letting go of the past, moving on, and calming down..." - Any way to paraphrase this? It's not wrong, but not that formal imo and the same words as the Rolling Stone article. Maybe change the first two with "overcoming the past"?
    • Changed to "overcoming the past and finding peace"
  • Ref 34 mentions bubblegum, was that meant to be placed after the genres or bubblegum pop is mentioned in the book?
    • Yes, the bubblegum and R&B genres are mentioned in the book

Critical reception

  • "...dubbed it "breezy kiss-off"..." - "dubbed it a 'breezy kiss-off'"?
    • Done

Personnel

  • I have a doubt: shouldn't it be "songwriting", "production", etc instead of "songwriter" and "producer"? To be consistent with "keyboards", which isn't "keyboardist".
    • I'm following WP:PERSONNEL, but let me know if I'm wrong
      • Oh, right.

Charts, Certifications

  • Look good!

References

  • Earwig's Copyvio says "Violation unlikely" with 25.4%. And even the similarity are the song's title and the lyrics used. Looks excellent!

Overall

A great article, Medxvo! Neutral, stable, verifiable... I almost had no comments, but I put this On hold while I wait for some responses before passing this. By the way, is there any usable pic? CatchMe (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much, CatchMe!! All should be addressed now, I've left comments above. I wanted to add images of Louis Bell and Frank Dukes, but Dukes doesn't have any. I also don't think a photo from the Eras Tour or the Reputation Tour would be helpful or related to prose so idk.... Let me know if anything needs further adjustments, hope you're doing well! Medxvo (talk) 22:43, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
In this case it's better without pictures as it's not a requirement. I don't find anything else to say and all my comments were adressed, so I'm glad to  Pass this! Great job! CatchMe (talk) 00:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI