Talk:Isle of Wight Academy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing Isle of Wight Academy and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Virginia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
[untitled section]
This sounds like a school admissions brochure. Please work on making the language more neutral.
Some old news
Black face incident
I do not know why the facts keep getting removed . I am not saying whether or not the students were right or wrong.or rather or not administration did anything about it . But it did happen. Bbeez25 (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- A lot of this stuff is opinion based and not based on facts. Either prove and cite or don't include it. Once you do that, then we'll talk about how this story is not really about the history of the school or how this inclusion of this on the page gives undue weight to an isolated incident you are trying to use to paint the institution in an unflattering light.
I will cite it later but trust me it is not an isolated incident and deserves its place. Linkdude2016 (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
Also who is link dude. He is deleting material on the page Linkdude2016 (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
- Prove it is not an isolated incident and then we'll talk. You seem like you have some sort of axe to grind, which makes you a party to this, which makes you ineligible to comment or participate in this. Look up Wikipedia guidelines.
History section copyright violation - 2021
I just deleted the entire History section. I note that there was a lot of discussion above about what should go there (about ten years ago), so I thought I should explain why briefly. The section that was there was copied directly from the source here. That source is clearly marked as being copyrighted, with all rights reserved. That means the section was a copyright violation, which is never acceptable in Wikipedia. --Gronk Oz (talk) 16:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)