Talk:Jesse Gray/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Guerreroast (talk · contribs) 21:31, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 11:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
 |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check: | ||
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
|
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
|
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | |
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | |
 |
7. Overall assessment. | |
Claiming this for review. Ruby2010 (talk) 11:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Ruby2010: Are you still interested in reviewing this? If not, should this be reset so someone else can pick it up? Z1720 (talk) 22:56, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
-
- @Z1720 How is it gone about resetting? Is the review going to be closed and I have to renominate it, or is there a process where that doesn't happen? Roast (talk) 00:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Guerreroast: I reset the nomination: the bot will reset it at GAN in the next few hours. Z1720 (talk) 00:14, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
- @Z1720 How is it gone about resetting? Is the review going to be closed and I have to renominate it, or is there a process where that doesn't happen? Roast (talk) 00:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)