Talk:John Allen Chau/GA1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 19:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Johnson524 (talk · contribs) 10:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
Initial comments
Hello! I'll get to reviewing this article in the coming days, cheers! 🙂 Johnson524 10:00, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. A user reverted my edits and I'm working to resolve the situation with them. Could the review wait a while? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 21:07, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- Absolutely! Thank you for letting me know, I won't review until you're comfortable with the state of the article. Johnson524 22:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think we should be good. I removed some redundancies and merged some smaller paragraphs. Just so everyone's on the same page here, I didn't include reactions to his death in the lead just yet, since I'd like some guidance on how to neutrally summarize them. As of right now, the user hasn't pinged me back... :( - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Waited about a week and half to mark as stable. It might look like a lot, but there's nothing too major to do before I believe this article passes. Thank you again for all your work! Johnson524 11:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- You're welcome! Also, I've started to expand the lead again, but it's late in my area. I added potential prose in hidden text, since I'm still not sure how to word the responses to his death neutrally... - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:50, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- Waited about a week and half to mark as stable. It might look like a lot, but there's nothing too major to do before I believe this article passes. Thank you again for all your work! Johnson524 11:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think we should be good. I removed some redundancies and merged some smaller paragraphs. Just so everyone's on the same page here, I didn't include reactions to his death in the lead just yet, since I'd like some guidance on how to neutrally summarize them. As of right now, the user hasn't pinged me back... :( - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:35, 5 February 2026 (UTC)
- Absolutely! Thank you for letting me know, I won't review until you're comfortable with the state of the article. Johnson524 22:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)
GA review
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- See Prose section below.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Truly above-and-beyond by archiving almost all 40 and even including author wikilinks like with Ed Stetzer!
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- See Spot check section below.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Waited a little bit of time for things to cool down, looks good now!
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- The infobox image of Chau needs to include Alt text. Additionally (and this is completely optional) I think an image of the island like this one would look good in the "Contact with Sentinelese and death" section as there's only the one image on the page now. This might interfere with the infobox though, so I'll leave that up to you.
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Prose
Lead
- Remove citations 2 and 3 (as they're cited later in the body) and move citation 1 to it's respective place in the body. Per MOS:LEADCITE, noncontroversial information described and cited in the body shouldn't be cited in the lead/infobox.
Done - Lead needs to be expanded to include information from the early life and aftermath sections so that each section of the page is represented. (Up to you, but I can make an example if you'd like! 😀)
- Before making his way to → Before travelling to
Done - Wikilink boot camp with Training camp
Done - by evangelical organization All Nations → by the evangelical organization All Nations
Done - missonary staff, who → missonary staff who
Done
Early life
- in Scottsboro, Alabama, as the third → in Scottsboro, Alabama.[citation] He was the third
Done - organizer for Chi Alpha → organizer for the Christian student organization Chi Alpha
Done - Add a citation after Vancouver Christian High School.
Done - attended Chinese Evangelical Church → attended the Chinese Evangelical Church
Done - He attended Oral Roberts University → He later attended Oral Roberts University
Done
Contact with Sentinelese and death
- The second and third sentences could use a citation at the end.
Done - He first traveled to the Andaman Islands in 2015 and 2016 as part of his missionary trips, but he did not → As part of these trips, Chau traveled to the Andaman Islands in 2015 and 2016, but did not
Done - "boot camp" → "boot camp"-style (per the lead, also add it's wikilink)
Done - Chau traveled to and established his residence → Chau established a residence
Done - In August 2018, → Earlier that year in August, (This one is more optional, but it feels like the dates read out of order if left as-is)
Done - the Indian Home Ministry had removed → the Indian Ministry Of Home Affairs removed and add wikilink to Ministry of Home Affairs (India)
Done - Remove (RAP), no need if the abbreviation isn't later used.
Done - Chau embarked on a journey to → Chau began his travel to
Done - which he thought could be → which he referred to as
Done - with the aim of contacting and living among the Sentinelese. → with the aim of contacting and living among the Sentinelese in an attempt to convert them to Christianity.
Done - In preparation for the trip, he was → In preparation for the trip he was
Done - he attempted to communicate with the islanders and to offer gifts, but he retreated → he attempted to communicate with the Sentinelese and offer gifts, but retreated
Done - However the citations are rearranged after these changes, be sure they're listed in numerical order (i.e. [26][20][2] → [2][20][26])
Done - (Further prose corrections in this section are described in the Spot check section below)
Aftermath
- residing in the capital city → residing in the city
Done - Remove the sentence Despite efforts by Indian authorities, which involved a tense encounter with the tribe, Chau's body was not recovered. as all of this information is repeated in the new-next sentences (see the Spot check section below)
Done - on the missionary community for inculcating an extreme Christian vision in Chau. → on the missionary community for instilling what he believed was an extreme Christian vision in Chau.
Done - The sentence with Sasikumar's quote needs a citation at the end of it.
Done - Same goes for the first sentence with Schönhuth's remarks.
Done - Is there a reason why Reflist set at 25em instead of the normal 30em?
Done
Spot check
Original research
Spot checked: 1
2
3
6
his visit to South Africa is not described as a mission trip, removed 7
23
The "–700" is not included in the citation, removed 30
31 (now 24)
Used also to replace what was previously ref 24 from the New York Post, which is not preferred per WP:NYPOST.
Plagiarism
Mostly false positives after running the page through Copyvio as usual with two notable exceptions, the main one being from The Mirror UK which returned a 47.1% match. The citation isn't even currently on the page and I wouldn't have been shocked if The Mirror had plagiarized Wikipedia when writing their piece, but their article is from February 2019 when the Wikipedia article wasn't started until March 2020, so I'm going to take the plagiarism threat at face value.
- From The Mirror UK
- On another visit, Chau recorded that the islanders reacted to him with a mixture of amusement, bewilderment, and hostility. He attempted to sing worship songs to them, and spoke to them in Xhosa, after which they often fell silent. → On another visit, Chau remarked the Sentinelese had again acted hostile, but in addition had shown amusement and curiosity.[citation] From his canoe he sung them Christian hymns and tried communicating in Xhosa, after which, they often became quiet.[citation]
Done
- Eventually, according to Chau's last letter, when he tried to hand over fish and gifts, a boy shot a metal-headed arrow that pierced the Bible he was holding in front of his chest, after which he retreated again. → In what would be his last letter, Chau described a later attempt at contact, during which, a Sentinelese boy had fired a metal-tipped arrow which pieced the Bible he was holding against his chest, forcing him to withdraw once more.[citation]
Done - On his final visit, on November 17, Chau instructed the fishermen to abandon him; afterwards, he was shot by the tribesmen's arrows, killing him. The fishermen later saw the islanders dragging Chau's body, which they saw the Sentinelese bury on the shore the following day. → On what became his final visit on November 17, Chau told the fishermen once again bringing him to the island to leave without him.[citation] Sometime during this visit, Chau was fatally struck Sentinelese arrows.[citation] The fishermen later reported seeing the Sentinelese drag his body and, the next day, bury him on the beach.[citation]
Done - Indian officials made several attempts to recover the body but eventually abandoned those efforts. An anthropologist involved in the case told The Guardian that the risk of a dangerous clash between investigators and the islanders was too great to justify any further attempts. → Indian authorities tried several times to retrieve Chau's body but were ultimately unsuccessful.[citation] An anthropologist involved in the attempts remarked the likelihood of a violent confrontation between recovery teams and the Sentinelese was too high to justify continuing the effort.[citation]
Done
- On another visit, Chau recorded that the islanders reacted to him with a mixture of amusement, bewilderment, and hostility. He attempted to sing worship songs to them, and spoke to them in Xhosa, after which they often fell silent. → On another visit, Chau remarked the Sentinelese had again acted hostile, but in addition had shown amusement and curiosity.[citation] From his canoe he sung them Christian hymns and tried communicating in Xhosa, after which, they often became quiet.[citation]
Done - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- From The Guardian
- An anthropologist involved in the case told the Guardian that the risk → [fixed in the corrections above]
Done
- An anthropologist involved in the case told the Guardian that the risk → [fixed in the corrections above]
Final comments
@OpalYosutebito: Sorry for the bit of delay! There's just a few more things that weren't fully fixed above that are needed before the final spot check (See the two new comments in the plagiarism section, and add alt text to the infobox image). Also, and this one could be significant, but can you find a source other than The Mirror? At least for a Good Article, I think it'd extremely beneficial to use a non-tabloid paper for these claims if possible (see WP:DAILYMIRROR). Once these are done we we'll be almost gtg 🙂 Johnson524 17:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- Okay. I'm at my computer right now :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 17:40, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- A lot of the claims by the Mirror were in the New York Times article - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:14, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
- @OpalYosutebito: Thank you for your time and patience! The spot check came back without major issue, so I think we're GTG 😀 I'll do the little remaining clean-up still needed as to not take up more of your time (i.e. there are some categories that aren't supported in the body that should be removed, etc.) And, while not required as part of the GA review process, I added two more visual aids to the article, expanded the lead, and split analysis and legacy into its own section as per the format of other articles. What do you think? Congrats on another GA and God bless! Johnson524 08:26, 24 February 2026 (UTC)