Talk:Kalergi Plan

No article on Wikipedia should use the phrase "Far Right" to describe anyone. That is unless there is an article about the concept of "Far Right" and how it is used as a divisive term, by some, to label information as invalid. The phrase, "Far Right" is almost always an ad hominem and has no place in civil discourse, much less an encyclopedia article. JoeAllen2 (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

It is? We go by what RS say. Slatersteven (talk) 19:44, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

There is an article titled Far Right but you could have found that by yourself. Pascalulu88 (talk) 13:42, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

This was their only post ever. Doug Weller talk 18:29, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Not even a single extract from Praktischer Idealismus to prove the conspiracy theory wrong, this page is just air-filled nonsense, using filler sentences and communicational tricks, I swear to God it's one of the worst written articles in Wikipedia ~2026-56786-7 (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

It is hardly going to provide anything to dispute a claim made after it was published. Slatersteven (talk) 17:31, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

The article makes it clear the conspiracy theory is wrong. Are you arguing it isn’t? Doug Weller talk 18:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

It makes no effort to demonstrate that the conspiracy theory is based on a mistranslation. Why doesn't the article feature the quote in question in its original language, and then attempt a faithful and impartial English translation? This shouldn't be too difficult unless he actually did say what the conspiracy theory says he did. ~2026-14250-14 (talk) 13:14, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

How could we provide a quote for something it doesn't say? Slatersteven (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

"I swear to God" Wikipedia does not require religious oaths. If you can find sources to improve the article, let us see them. Dimadick (talk) 20:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)